Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Strait of Hormuz Toll System
ConceptIR

Strait of Hormuz Toll System

Iran's PGSA toll on Hormuz transit: OFAC-sanctioned, disputed as illegal under UNCLOS.

Last refreshed: 30 June 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

OFAC sanctioned the PGSA on 28 May; who legally coordinates a toll-free reopening?

Timeline for Strait of Hormuz Toll System

View full timeline →
Common Questions
What is the Strait of Hormuz toll and how does it work?
Iran's IRGC charges $1 per barrel (roughly $2 million per large tanker) for passage through a 5-mile corridor in the Strait of Hormuz. Ships must pass background checks, carry VHF passcodes, accept escort, and change flag if required. Non-compliant vessels face drone or missile strikes.Source: Lloyd's List Intelligence
Is the Hormuz toll legal under international law?
No. UNCLOS guarantees innocent passage through international straits and permits fees only for specific services rendered. Iran claims wartime sovereignty suspends that right. The EU explicitly rejected the toll as a UNCLOS violation. Iran's Majlis is advancing domestic legislation to codify it regardless.Source: EU statement / UNCLOS
Is the Strait of Hormuz open or closed right now?
Partially open but effectively blockaded. Weekly transits stand at roughly 53, down from a pre-war baseline of 966. 325 oil tankers remain stranded in the Gulf. The IRGC declared on 12 April the strait will never return to its previous status.Source: Kpler / IRGC

Background

The Strait of Hormuz Toll System shapes European gas markets through the LNG supply it has removed since February 2026. With roughly 20% of global LNG normally transiting Hormuz, the IRGC's $1-per-barrel charge and associated interdiction risk kept the strait effectively closed to LNG traffic since 28 February 2026, accumulating over 12 bcm of supply loss to European terminals. TTF held a tight EUR 43.4 to 47.4/MWh range in the week to 4 May 2026, pricing the closure as persistent background rather than acute crisis.

For European energy desks, the operative signal from the toll system is not the per-barrel fee itself but the transit architecture it imposes. The Mubaraz completed the first loaded LNG Hormuz transit since the war began on 27 April, heading to Asia rather than Europe, consistent with post-conflict cargoes routing to higher-priced Asian markets. Project Freedom's 4 May announcement produced only a +1.48% TTF move, confirming that markets price the system as a durable geopolitical risk rather than a bottleneck about to clear.

The toll system's persistence amplifies the EU's storage pace problem. At 0.21 pp/day actual injection against a 0.257 pp/day floor required for 80% fill by 1 November, every week the Hormuz route remains closed is a week Atlantic LNG supply must compensate at spread economics that do not favour European bias over Asian spot demand. Bruegel's EUR 26-44bn refill model assumes cargo supply availability; the toll system is the structural constraint on that assumption. Brent's 19% fall across May 2026 to $92.05 on 29 May (its steepest monthly decline since March 2020) reflects diplomatic optimism over the unsigned MOU rather than any physical reopening of the LNG route. By end of Q2 2026, Brent had closed at $72.91, a 30 per cent quarterly decline from the Q1 wartime high of $123, with the toll architecture still legally intact and the PGSA still OFAC-designated.

Iran's Strait of Hormuz Toll System began as an improvised military blockade in late February 2026 and evolved by May into the Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA), a formal Iranian body with an official X account, a vessel-submission portal, and published maritime coordinates. The IRGC charges $1 per barrel in yuan or stablecoins, with a VLCC paying roughly $2 million per transit. The Hormozgan Provincial Command runs background checks, applies a five-tier country classification, and requires flag changes, VHF passcodes, and patrol escort. Iran's Majlis advanced a bill on 27 March to codify the system as permanent domestic law; the Majlis National Security Committee subsequently passed an 11-article Strategic Action Plan mandating rial-only fees and banning vessels of hostile nations.

On 28 May 2026 the system entered a new legal paradox: US and Iranian negotiators reached a tentative 60-day memorandum of understanding to reopen Hormuz with no tolls, while OFAC simultaneously designated the PGSA under Executive Order 13224, the counterterrorism sanctions authority. Any vessel transiting a toll-free strait coordinated by the PGSA would be transacting with a designated counterparty under US law, leaving the reopening architecture legally unresolved. Trump did not sign the MOU; Khamenei had not approved the text either.

The legal case against the toll remains categorical. Under UNCLOS, innocent passage through international straits is a guaranteed right and unilateral transit fees have no legal basis. The IRGC declared on 12 April the strait will "never return to its previous status". By early April, weekly transits had risen to 53 but remained over 90% below the pre-war baseline of 966 per week. The UN Security Council voted 11 to 2 for a Hormuz reopening resolution; Russia and China vetoed, with China's veto directly protecting the toll architecture its own tankers exploit. The IEA declared the disruption the largest oil supply shock in global market history.

By 16 June 2026, a partial Ceasefire reduced direct hostilities in the strait. CENTCOM struck Iranian minelayer positions at Sirik, Bandar-e Lengeh, and Qeshm on 27 June 2026, directly targeting the physical enforcement infrastructure of the toll system. The IRGC responded with coordinated attacks on US bases in Kuwait and Bahrain. On 28 June, Foreign Minister Araghchi, speaking in Baghdad, claimed Iran's 'sole oversight' of the strait for 30 days and demanded recognition of a single Iranian coastal corridor, the most assertive public framing of Iranian passage authority since the PGSA was established. A verbal US-Iran stand-down followed on 29 June 2026, with the US stating vessels could move freely; no formal instrument was signed and the PGSA remained designated under Executive Order 13224.

By end of Q2 2026, Brent Crude had fallen from its wartime high of $123 to $72.91, a 30 per cent quarterly decline driven by diplomatic temperature rather than any structural resolution of the toll architecture. Weekly transits fell from a pre-war baseline of 966 to as low as 53 at peak blockade; the IEA declared the disruption the largest oil supply shock in global market history. The PGSA's toll system remains Iranian domestic law and its OFAC designation remains live; the Araghchi sole-oversight claim is now the body's most assertive legal framing since the UN Security Council veto.

More questions
Why did Trump propose a joint venture on the Hormuz toll?
Trump suggested the US and Iran co-operate on toll collection as a revenue-sharing arrangement during Islamabad talks. The EU rejected the idea as legally incompatible with UNCLOS. Iran has not formally accepted or rejected the proposal.Source: EU Foreign Affairs / Reuters
What does codifying the Hormuz toll into Iranian law mean?
It converts a wartime coercive measure into a permanent statutory instrument. Any future Iranian government would need a formal legislative act to abolish it, making it FAR harder to trade away in negotiations. Iran's Majlis advanced the bill on 27 March 2026.Source: Reuters / Al Jazeera
What is the Strait of Hormuz toll system and how does it work?
Iran's IRGC charges $1 per barrel (paid in yuan or stablecoins) on vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, with a VLCC paying roughly $2 million per transit. It has been operative since February 2026 and is illegal under UNCLOS.Source: Lowdown / UNCLOS
How has the Hormuz toll affected European gas prices?
Hormuz has been closed to LNG traffic since 28 February 2026, removing roughly 20% of global LNG supply. TTF held EUR 43-47/MWh through late April to early May 2026, pricing the closure as durable risk.Source: ICE / GIE AGSI+
Is Project Freedom likely to reopen Hormuz to LNG tankers?
Markets gave a muted response: TTF moved only +1.48% on the 4 May announcement. The Mubaraz precedent showed the first post-conflict Hormuz LNG transit went to Asia, not Europe, suggesting traders price the operation as risk management, not a supply unlock.Source: Al Jazeera / ICE
Why is the Hormuz toll illegal under international law?
UNCLOS guarantees innocent passage through international straits as a right; unilateral transit fees have no legal basis. The EU and Shipping Industry have rejected the toll outright on these grounds.Source: UNCLOS / EU Council
What does it mean that OFAC sanctioned the PGSA while signing a Hormuz MOU?
On 28 May 2026 the US Treasury designated Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority under EO 13224 (counterterrorism) at the same moment negotiators initialled a 60-day toll-free reopening MOU. Any ship transiting a PGSA-coordinated strait would be dealing with a sanctioned entity under US law, making the reopening architecture legally contradictory unless OFAC issues a specific licence.Source: OFAC / Reuters
What is Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority and who runs it?
The PGSA is Iran's formal administrative body for the Hormuz toll system, launched in May 2026 with an official X account and vessel-submission portal. It publishes maritime zone coordinates and processes transit applications. OFAC designated it a sanctioned entity under EO 13224 on 28 May 2026.Source: PGSA / OFAC
What did Iran's foreign minister claim about Hormuz control in June 2026?
On 28 June 2026, Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi declared in Baghdad that Iran claimed sole oversight of the Strait of Hormuz for 30 days and demanded a single coastal corridor. The claim came days before a verbal US-Iran stand-down that did not resolve the PGSA's legal status or sanctions designation.Source: Lowdown Iran Conflict 2026 briefing
Source Material