Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
25MAY

UAE blocks BRICS Iran statement after Gulf drone strikes

4 min read
13:55UTC

The BRICS foreign ministers' meeting in New Delhi ended 14-15 May without a joint declaration after the UAE, hit by Iranian drones on 10 May, demanded Iran be condemned for strikes on neighbouring states.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

The UAE has broken BRICS ranks against Iran inside the bloc Tehran calls the alternative to Western order.

India, chairing the BRICS foreign ministers' meeting in New Delhi on 14-15 May, issued a Chair's Statement and Outcome Document in place of a joint declaration, citing "differing views" on the Middle East 1. Abbas Araghchi, Iran's Foreign Minister, named the blocker as a member with "its own special relations with Israel", a description that points to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) without using the name. The UAE demanded Iran be condemned for attacks on neighbouring states; Iran wanted the United States and Israel condemned instead. BRICS is the Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa bloc, expanded at the 2024 Kazan summit to include Iran, the UAE and others.

The veto's evidentiary base sits in the casualty record. Iranian drones hit the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar in a coordinated morning operation on 10 May , and the US-flagged Safesea Neha was struck 23 nautical miles north-east of Doha the same day . Saudi Arabia issued its first formal Gulf-state protest of the war in response . Two weeks later, a Gulf state Iranian munitions reached publicly broke the consensus framework Tehran has been describing as its diplomatic alternative to the Western coalition.

The optics compound the damage. Araghchi arrived on the Minab168 aircraft (Event 1, , then told the same meeting Iran had created no Hormuz obstacles . The fuselage carried a Hormuz grievance; the spoken position denied a Hormuz obstruction; the bloc's joint declaration foundered on Iran's Hormuz conduct. Inside the framework Iran has consistently described as the alternative to the West, the first public split has now landed against Tehran, and the dissenter is a Gulf neighbour Iranian drones hit two weeks ago.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

BRICS is a group of major emerging economies including Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and, since 2024, Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The group met in New Delhi on 14-15 May and tried to issue a joint statement about the Middle East crisis. Iran wanted the statement to condemn the US and Israel. The UAE, which had been hit by Iranian drone strikes on 10 May, wanted the statement to condemn Iran. Neither side would back down, so the group gave up on a joint statement entirely. India, which was hosting the meeting, issued a summary document instead. This is the first time a Gulf state, one that Iranian weapons actually hit, publicly broke ranks against Iran inside a framework Tehran has been calling the alternative to Western-led international order.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The Kazan 2024 BRICS expansion admitted Iran and the UAE simultaneously, without resolving the Iran-UAE bilateral dispute over the Tunb Islands and Abu Musa, which Iran has occupied since 1971. The UAE has never formally recognised Iranian sovereignty over the three islands; Iran has never offered to negotiate.

Admitting both states to a consensus-only bloc without a bilateral normalisation track created a structural veto pair waiting for a triggering incident. The 10 May drone strikes were the trigger, but the veto architecture predated them by 14 months.

Abu Dhabi's dependence on the Abraham Accords normalisation track with Israel, signed in September 2020, adds a second structural driver. The UAE cannot sign a joint condemnation of Israel without rupturing the Accords architecture; it cannot sign a non-condemnation of Iran without legitimising drone strikes on its own territory. Both constraints simultaneously bind Abu Dhabi, and neither the UAE nor Iran offered to yield on either point in Delhi.

Escalation

The first bloc-level diplomatic failure against Iran on Iran's own BRICS turf signals a structural fragmentation of the 'Global South' consensus Tehran has been presenting as its diplomatic alternative to Western pressure. If the UAE break is durable, it removes one of Iran's primary arguments for holding out against a US-dictated settlement.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    The BRICS deadlock removes the most credible non-Western multilateral framework from the mediation landscape, leaving Pakistan's bilateral back-channel and Oman's consultation track as the only active non-US venues.

    Short term · High
  • Risk

    If the UAE veto becomes a recurring feature of BRICS meetings, it establishes a structural division within the bloc between Gulf states and Iran that could fragment BRICS's emerging-market cohesion across multiple future agenda items.

    Medium term · Medium
  • Meaning

    Araghchi's decision to identify the UAE without naming it publicly, describing a member with 'its own special relations with Israel', signals Tehran treats the UAE's BRICS veto as an Abraham Accords instrument rather than a sovereign dispute, which forecloses the bilateral repair track.

    Short term · Medium
First Reported In

Update #100 · Tehran prints the toll book; Delhi joins the queue

The Wire (India)· 17 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Lloyd's of London
Lloyd's of London
The Joint War Committee left Hormuz war-risk premiums at $10-14 million per voyage on 25 May, declining to move on Brent's 5% fall. The JWC's protocol requires a UN Security Council resolution or bilateral government certification letter before de-listing, and neither has arrived: a verbal understanding does not satisfy the formal condition the reinsurance market's treaty terms require.
Gulf Arab producers
Gulf Arab producers
Saudi Arabia and UAE depend on Hormuz for their own crude exports; Aramco CEO Nasser has warned no oil market recovery arrives until 2027 if the blockade continues past mid-June. Monday's $98.96 Brent settlement shortens nothing for Gulf producers without a signed instrument and a Pentagon mine-clearance timeline that runs up to six months post-ceasefire.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar holds $12bn of frozen Iranian assets at the centre of the sequencing dispute but cannot release them without explicit US Treasury authorisation, given the original freeze was a US instrument. As the asset-holding state, Qatar's leverage is real but passive: it is the escrow holder, not the decision-maker, and any resolution requires US Treasury sign-off that Trump has withheld.
Pakistan
Pakistan
With both Prime Minister Sharif and army chief Munir simultaneously in Beijing on 25 May, Pakistan has for the first time consolidated its civilian and military mediation tracks under China's roof. Munir's direct Tehran-to-Beijing flight signals that the security and financial threads of the sequencing problem are now being worked in parallel rather than sequentially.
China
China
Beijing hosted Pakistan's principal mediators and Iran's China envoy Ghalibaf simultaneously on 25 May while its banking regulator capped new state-bank lending to five sanctioned refiners. China is simultaneously the most credible third-party underwriter of the $12bn sequencing and the state whose institutions face live OFAC secondary-sanctions exposure if the deadlock persists through GL V's expiry.
United States
United States
Trump posted on 24 May that the blockade holds until a deal is certified and signed, ruling out the informal MOU structure both sides had been building. The 'certified, and signed' condition is the first operational bar Trump has attached in 87 days, but it arrived without an executive instrument, maintaining the gap between posted ultimatum and signed US policy.