Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
11SEP

Araghchi denies Hormuz obstruction at BRICS Delhi

3 min read
09:25UTC

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told BRICS foreign ministers in New Delhi on 14 May that Iran has not created any obstacles in the Strait of Hormuz, one day after Iran's Supreme National Security Council finalised a formal Hormuz security plan.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Araghchi denied Hormuz obstruction at BRICS the day after Iran's SNSC finalised a formal control architecture for the strait.

Abbas Araghchi, Iran's Foreign Minister, arrived in New Delhi on 14 May having announced his attendance at the BRICS (the Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa grouping, a multilateral forum for non-Western powers) foreign ministers meeting the previous day . In his address, he told the assembled ministers that Iran "has not created any obstacles in the strait of Hormuz" 1. The claim was structured for a non-Western audience and delivered one day after Iran's Supreme National Security Council finalised a formal Hormuz security plan that operationalises the transit toll and corridor regime.

Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Bagheri Kani, accompanying Araghchi in Delhi, called on BRICS states to act "against US aggression." South China Morning Post reported Iran's anti-American rhetoric was testing India's balancing posture 2. India is the largest non-Chinese user of Iranian-routed crude, with domestic political constraints that make open endorsement of Araghchi's framing costly; Delhi is expected to prioritise de-escalation language over bloc confrontation in the final communique.

The Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA), established on 5 May, requires vessels to register, pay a transit toll in Chinese yuan, and adhere to a designated corridor . Tehran frames those requirements as regulatory, not obstructive; Araghchi's Delhi statement carries that framing to a non-Western audience that has not signed up to Washington's counter-position. The denial is designed to hold simultaneously with the operational architecture. Iran had also declared no US weapons may transit Hormuz into regional bases, announced the same day as Araghchi's denial, adding a new operational constraint while the Foreign Minister described a strait without obstacles.

The BRICS stage gives Tehran a non-Western readership that is both sympathetic and practically important. Whether the BRICS communique adopts Araghchi's "no obstacles" framing or remains neutral on the transit regime question is one of the key diplomatic tests of the Delhi meeting.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The BRICS group, which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, is a forum where non-Western countries coordinate positions. Iran's foreign minister went to their meeting in New Delhi on 14 May and told them Iran was not blocking the Strait of Hormuz. The day before, Iran's own security council had approved a formal plan to control the strait with tolls and corridors. Iran told the BRICS audience one thing and did another thing at home. The key question now is whether India, which chairs BRICS and buys a lot of Iranian oil, will back Iran's framing or stay neutral.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Iran's need to maintain non-Western alignment while the bilateral US-Iran track operates through Pakistan reflects a domestic constraint: Mojtaba Khamenei's government cannot be seen to negotiate with Washington without simultaneously demonstrating non-Western solidarity. The BRICS presence is a legitimacy-maintenance exercise for the domestic audience, not a negotiating move directed at Washington.

The structural tension between Araghchi's "no obstacles" claim at BRICS and the SNSC's written Hormuz security plan produced one day earlier is resolved by audience separation: the denial is for BRICS consumption, the written architecture is for operational and legal purposes. Both can coexist because they address different audiences on different registers.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    BRICS communique language on Hormuz will reveal India's positioning: adoption of Iran's 'no obstacles' framing would give the PGSA toll regime non-Western multilateral cover; de-escalation language would leave Iran's regulatory framing without BRICS endorsement.

  • Risk

    Bagheri Kani's call for BRICS states to act against US aggression tests India's chair neutrality at a time when Delhi has maintained public silence on US Iran sanctions targeting Indian firms in the Shamkhani network.

First Reported In

Update #97 · Chips for Beijing, no paper for Iran

South China Morning Post· 14 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Turkey
Turkey
Golden Global Portfoy Yonetimi closed three funds to new money a day after telling regulators they were legally separate from its sanctioned parent, and the central bank held its rate at 37 per cent citing energy-driven inflation risk. Ankara is absorbing balance-sheet and monetary costs from a war it is not fighting.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's foreign ministry said it was coordinating with China during a Beijing visit to restart negotiations, while filing hundreds of letters at the UN documenting Iranian strikes on its own civilian facilities. Doha is mediating for a neighbour it is also formally accusing, a contradiction the referral's clean vote count does not show.
China and Russia
China and Russia
China and Russia voted against the IAEA referral alongside Niger, and Iran's ambassador told the Board that inspections were impossible during a war Iran did not start. Beijing is separately mediating between Doha and Tehran, meaning the same power blocking the West's legal track is running the diplomatic one that might actually end the war.
Jordan
Jordan
Jordan said it intercepted 18 of the 20 Iranian ballistic missiles fired at its territory on 8 September, the war's first sustained salvo against a state that is not a combatant. Amman's 90 per cent interception rate held, but a tenfold jump in missiles fired in a single volley raises what the next one might carry.
United States
United States
CENTCOM said its strikes disabled five Iranian tankers only after two failed missile attempts on a US warship, and Treasury moved the same week to a presumption of denial on all Iran licences. Washington now treats commercial shipping and financial plumbing as one enforcement front rather than two separate tracks.
Iran / IRGC
Iran / IRGC
Iran's foreign ministry called the CENTCOM tanker strikes a war crime and a breach of the UN Charter, while the IRGC named two US destroyers it says it damaged without releasing images. Tehran expects the claims, unverifiable either way, to sustain domestic morale after losing five tankers in a single day.