Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
17AUG

Araghchi denies Hormuz obstruction at BRICS Delhi

3 min read
15:37UTC

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told BRICS foreign ministers in New Delhi on 14 May that Iran has not created any obstacles in the Strait of Hormuz, one day after Iran's Supreme National Security Council finalised a formal Hormuz security plan.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Araghchi denied Hormuz obstruction at BRICS the day after Iran's SNSC finalised a formal control architecture for the strait.

Abbas Araghchi, Iran's Foreign Minister, arrived in New Delhi on 14 May having announced his attendance at the BRICS (the Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa grouping, a multilateral forum for non-Western powers) foreign ministers meeting the previous day . In his address, he told the assembled ministers that Iran "has not created any obstacles in the strait of Hormuz" 1. The claim was structured for a non-Western audience and delivered one day after Iran's Supreme National Security Council finalised a formal Hormuz security plan that operationalises the transit toll and corridor regime.

Deputy Foreign Minister Ali Bagheri Kani, accompanying Araghchi in Delhi, called on BRICS states to act "against US aggression." South China Morning Post reported Iran's anti-American rhetoric was testing India's balancing posture 2. India is the largest non-Chinese user of Iranian-routed crude, with domestic political constraints that make open endorsement of Araghchi's framing costly; Delhi is expected to prioritise de-escalation language over bloc confrontation in the final communique.

The Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA), established on 5 May, requires vessels to register, pay a transit toll in Chinese yuan, and adhere to a designated corridor . Tehran frames those requirements as regulatory, not obstructive; Araghchi's Delhi statement carries that framing to a non-Western audience that has not signed up to Washington's counter-position. The denial is designed to hold simultaneously with the operational architecture. Iran had also declared no US weapons may transit Hormuz into regional bases, announced the same day as Araghchi's denial, adding a new operational constraint while the Foreign Minister described a strait without obstacles.

The BRICS stage gives Tehran a non-Western readership that is both sympathetic and practically important. Whether the BRICS communique adopts Araghchi's "no obstacles" framing or remains neutral on the transit regime question is one of the key diplomatic tests of the Delhi meeting.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The BRICS group, which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, is a forum where non-Western countries coordinate positions. Iran's foreign minister went to their meeting in New Delhi on 14 May and told them Iran was not blocking the Strait of Hormuz. The day before, Iran's own security council had approved a formal plan to control the strait with tolls and corridors. Iran told the BRICS audience one thing and did another thing at home. The key question now is whether India, which chairs BRICS and buys a lot of Iranian oil, will back Iran's framing or stay neutral.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Iran's need to maintain non-Western alignment while the bilateral US-Iran track operates through Pakistan reflects a domestic constraint: Mojtaba Khamenei's government cannot be seen to negotiate with Washington without simultaneously demonstrating non-Western solidarity. The BRICS presence is a legitimacy-maintenance exercise for the domestic audience, not a negotiating move directed at Washington.

The structural tension between Araghchi's "no obstacles" claim at BRICS and the SNSC's written Hormuz security plan produced one day earlier is resolved by audience separation: the denial is for BRICS consumption, the written architecture is for operational and legal purposes. Both can coexist because they address different audiences on different registers.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    BRICS communique language on Hormuz will reveal India's positioning: adoption of Iran's 'no obstacles' framing would give the PGSA toll regime non-Western multilateral cover; de-escalation language would leave Iran's regulatory framing without BRICS endorsement.

  • Risk

    Bagheri Kani's call for BRICS states to act against US aggression tests India's chair neutrality at a time when Delhi has maintained public silence on US Iran sanctions targeting Indian firms in the Shamkhani network.

First Reported In

Update #97 · Chips for Beijing, no paper for Iran

South China Morning Post· 14 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Kpler counted five Hormuz transits on 16 August against 31 the previous weekend, while Windward logged four vessels going AIS-dark for up to a month; underwriters price both the attacks and a sanctions register that names their counterparties in unreadable scanned images. Two trackers now measure only the ships that consent to be seen.
China
China
China sits at the end of the payment chain the 14 August designation targets: Iran's shadow banking network exists to convert sanctioned oil sales, much of it to Chinese refiners, into usable funds. Beijing has previously refused to recognise OFAC's jurisdiction over its own entities buying Iranian crude, leaving this designation to test compliance rather than change trade.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's foreign ministry denied on 16 August holding any Iranian pilots alive, contradicting Iranian General Mohammad Bagherzadeh's claim that Doha holds three Su-24 aircrew, and said it had recovered only one set of remains. Qatar carries Iran's messages to Washington, and this is a public break with Tehran over a fact only one aircrew inquiry can settle.
Oman
Oman
Oman's shipping-map talks, covering monitoring, environment and maritime services, were publicly decoupled from any Hormuz reopening by Iran's own foreign minister on 17 August. Muscat's mediation channel keeps functioning on the narrow file it was given, while the political decision it hoped to unlock stays with Iran's security council.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia separately called the recurrence of tanker attacks on Emirati shipping a dangerous escalation, breaking from the UAE's repeated formula. Riyadh speaking in its own name over an attack on another state's vessels signals it reads the pattern differently from Abu Dhabi's flat statements.
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
The UAE foreign ministry condemned a third ADNOC-linked tanker attack on 15 August in language identical, word for word, to its statement the day before. Three consecutive strikes on Emirati shipping have not moved Abu Dhabi's public wording by a single adjective.