Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
21SEP

Six ships hit from Hormuz to Basra

4 min read
15:34UTC

Six commercial vessels struck in 14 hours across 200 kilometres, from Hormuz to Iraq's Basra oil terminal. Iran deployed explosive drone boats for the first time — a weapon it previously only supplied to proxies — and extended the maritime war into the waters that carry Iraq's sole significant source of hard currency.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Six vessels across 200km in 14 hours signals coordinated multi-axis operations, not opportunistic harassment.

Six commercial vessels were struck within a 14-hour window on Thursday across 200 kilometres of water, from the strait of Hormuz to Iraq's Basra Oil Terminal. The Safesea Vishnu (Marshall Islands-flagged tanker) and Zefyros (Maltese-flagged tanker) were both hit near Basra — both caught fire. One crew member was found dead. Thirty-eight were rescued. The ONE Majesty (Japan-flagged) was struck while anchored near Ras al-Khaimah, UAE. The Star Gwyneth (Marshall Islands bulk carrier) was hit northwest of Dubai. A container ship was struck 35 nautical miles north of Jebel Ali. Weapons used included anti-ship missiles, sea mines, remotely detonated waterborne IEDs, and — for the first time in Iran's own operations — explosive-laden unmanned surface vessels.

The expansion into Iraqi territorial waters carries consequences well beyond the immediate casualties. Iraq's federal budget depends on oil exports for over 90% of its hard-currency revenue. The Basra terminal complex — Al Basrah Oil Terminal and Khor al-Amaya — handles virtually all southern crude exports, approximately 3.3 million barrels per day. Iraq had already cut output by roughly 1.5 million barrels per day as the maritime war closed alternative routes . Attacks reaching Basra's anchorage force Baghdad into the choice it has spent the entire war avoiding: between its security relationship with Washington and its economic dependence on Iranian cooperation for border trade, electricity imports, and natural gas supplies. The International Maritime Organisation's cumulative tally before Thursday already stood at 10 vessels attacked, 7 seafarers killed, and 20,000 stranded in the Gulf . Thursday's six-vessel salvo nearly doubled the vessel count in a single day.

The drone boats are the tactical story within the strategic one. Iran has supplied similar weapons to Houthi forces in Yemen, where they were used against Saudi and Coalition shipping in the Red Sea, but had not previously deployed them from its own forces in combat. Drone boats are harder to detect on radar than incoming missiles, operate in shallow coastal waters where conventional warships face draft constraints, and cost a fraction of the anti-ship ballistic missiles the IRGC has been expending since 28 February. The pattern is asymmetric adaptation under fire: as CENTCOM destroys missile launchers and naval vessels, the IRGC shifts to weapons that are cheaper, more expendable, and harder to neutralise from the air. The IRGC declared on Wednesday that "not a litre of oil" would pass through Hormuz . Thursday's attacks show the blockade expanding beyond the strait itself — reaching the loading terminals and anchorages that were supposed to offer alternative export routes for Gulf producers cut off from Hormuz transit.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iranian forces struck six ships in a single day across a vast stretch of water — from the entrance to the Gulf all the way up to Iraq's main oil loading port. Think of it as simultaneous attacks at both ends of a major shipping motorway. One of the ships was struck near Jebel Ali in the UAE — one of the world's busiest ports, handling a large share of consumer goods imports across the Middle East. This is significant: attacks this close to a major port hub threaten not just oil exports but the broader flow of imported goods through the region, with consequences for prices far beyond the Gulf.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The named vessels carry Marshall Islands, Maltese, and Japanese flags — three distinct flag-state jurisdictions in a single operational window. Spreading damage across multiple registries fragments the diplomatic response: no single nation becomes the primary victim state with clear standing to demand a military answer. This distribution appears deliberate, not coincidental.

Escalation

Strikes 35 nautical miles north of Jebel Ali mark the first attacks within UAE's immediate maritime approach zone — waters Abu Dhabi has direct security interest in protecting. Abu Dhabi now faces a choice between its studied neutrality and demanding naval protection, with either option carrying strategic cost it has so far avoided.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Attacks within UAE's maritime approach zone place Abu Dhabi's studied neutrality under direct pressure, forcing a choice between requesting escorts and absorbing ongoing attacks.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Risk

    A Lloyd's war risk zone extension to UAE approach waters would functionally restrict commercial transits independently of the Hormuz blockade, compounding economic disruption across all import categories.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Iraqi state revenue disruption at Basra threatens Baghdad's capacity to pay approximately 4 million direct public sector employees, creating domestic political instability inside a country Iran depends on for strategic depth.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Multi-flag targeting across a single operational window fragments the coalition of injured states, preventing any unified flag-state military response and establishing a template for future maritime grey-zone campaigns.

    Medium term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #33 · Oil breaks $100; war reaches Iraqi waters

Al Jazeera· 13 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Six ships hit from Hormuz to Basra
The geographic expansion to Iraqi territorial waters threatens Baghdad's oil export lifeline — roughly 3.3 million barrels per day through the Basra terminal complex, accounting for over 90% of Iraq's hard-currency revenue. The deployment of drone boats marks a tactical shift from conventional anti-ship missiles to asymmetric weapons that are cheaper, harder to detect, and cannot be neutralised by air strikes — a direct adaptation to CENTCOM's degradation of Iran's missile launchers and naval vessels.
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.