Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
11JUN

IRGC fires 70th wave, commanders falling

4 min read
09:17UTC

Four senior figures killed in a single week have not slowed the IRGC's attack tempo or its commercial management of the Hormuz toll system — the organisation runs on institutional machinery, not individual leaders.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

The IRGC runs on pre-delegated doctrine, not individual commanders — decapitation is not degrading operational tempo.

The IRGC announced its 70th wave of Operation True Promise 4 on Saturday — four waves in four days since the 66th wave reported on Tuesday . Seventy waves in approximately 23 days of war yields an average of three per day. Each wave deploys combinations of Khorramshahr-4, Qadr multi-warhead, Kheibar Shekan, and Zolfaqar ballistic missiles alongside drones, targeting Israeli territory, US bases, and Gulf state infrastructure simultaneously. Iran has NOW fired more than 400 ballistic missiles at Israel since 28 February, with Israeli air defences intercepting approximately 92%.

The attack tempo has not faltered despite the loss of four senior IRGC-affiliated figures in a single week: Ali Larijani, secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and Basij commander Gholamreza Soleimani were killed together in Tehran on 16 March . Intelligence Minister Esmail Khatib was killed the following day . IRGC spokesman Brig. Gen. Ali Mohammad Naeini was killed on 19 March — minutes after publicly insisting Iran was still manufacturing missiles, contradicting US claims of 90% capacity destruction . The IRGC simultaneously manages the strait of Hormuz toll system, processing roughly 89 to 90 vessels over the first two weeks of March under a regime that requires cargo manifests, crew nationalities, and payments of up to $2 million per transit 1.

The IRGC's resilience reflects a command architecture built for exactly this scenario. The organisation was restructured after the January 2020 killing of Qasem Soleimani, distributing operational authority across regional commands and functional directorates precisely to avoid single-point-of-failure vulnerabilities. The corps controls its own intelligence, its own missile forces, its own naval arm, and — through the Khatam al-Anbiya construction headquarters — a parallel economic infrastructure worth tens of billions of dollars. It does not require a functioning Supreme Leader to operate daily; Jerusalem Post sources described the current power arrangement as one in which "the Revolutionary Guards are controlling him, not the other way around" 2, referring to Mojtaba Khamenei.

The US-Israeli campaign has now struck more than 8,000 targets and killed three members of The Supreme Leader's inner circle. The operational logic assumes that leadership elimination degrades an adversary's capacity to sustain operations and eventually forces a negotiated settlement. The IRGC's 70th wave is the counter-evidence: the organisation operates on institutional momentum, pre-delegated authority, and dispersed command nodes. The question this poses for Washington and Tel Aviv is whether the decapitation strategy has a threshold at which cumulative losses produce organisational paralysis — or whether the IRGC, like the Viet Cong's provincial structure or the Taliban's shura councils, is an institution whose distributed design means it absorbs leadership losses without proportional operational degradation.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Despite losing four top generals in a single week, Iran's Revolutionary Guards are still launching daily missile attacks and running a complex toll system on the world's most important oil shipping lane. This is not luck — it is how the IRGC was engineered. After the Iran-Iraq war, it distributed authority so that no single commander's death could halt operations. The organisation effectively functions on standing orders, operating continuously without requiring direction from the top.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The combination of sustained missile waves and Hormuz toll administration under leadership attrition indicates the IRGC has effectively separated tactical execution from strategic command. Mid-level commanders are executing standing orders without apex authorisation. This means decapitation targeting is producing symbolic rather than operational effects — and may be consuming limited precision-strike capacity while simultaneously strengthening the domestic narrative that the IRGC is indispensable to Iranian national survival.

Root Causes

The IRGC's resilience reflects its 45-year development as a parallel state — controlling construction firms, import monopolies, financial networks and media alongside military functions. This economic and institutional breadth means military decapitation does not touch the organisation's substrate. The IRGC is not a conventional military hierarchy vulnerable to leadership attrition; it is a state-within-a-state with distributed authority and pre-delegated operational chains that run independently of any supreme commander.

Escalation

The four-wave-per-day cadence — 66 to 70 waves in four days — is consistent with prior tempo, indicating no measurable operational degradation from leadership losses. The IRGC's simultaneous management of Hormuz toll collection and daily missile operations demonstrates sufficient middle-management depth to run complex parallel activities, a level of institutional capacity that decapitation strikes have not visibly degraded.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Decapitation strategy is not degrading IRGC operational tempo; symbolic leadership kills are not producing measurable strategic effects on the organisation's output.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    US and Israeli planners may continue consuming precision-strike capacity on senior IRGC figures while operational output — missile waves, toll collection — remains unchanged.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    If the IRGC institutionalises Hormuz toll collection as a revenue mechanism, it acquires a long-term economic incentive to maintain selective closure regardless of any political settlement.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Precedent

    The IRGC model — state-within-state with pre-delegated authority and commercial substrate — demonstrates a decapitation-resistant architecture that adversarial non-state and hybrid actors will study and replicate.

    Long term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #45 · Ultimatum expires; Iran tolls Hormuz at $2m

Al Jazeera· 23 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
IRGC fires 70th wave, commanders falling
The IRGC's ability to sustain daily multi-front operations while simultaneously running a complex maritime toll system — despite the rapid-fire elimination of four senior figures — demonstrates an institutional command structure that does not depend on centralised leadership. This has direct implications for the US-Israeli decapitation strategy and for how long Iran can maintain offensive operations.
Different Perspectives
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Brent fell to $89.25 on ceasefire probability, not new barrels, with traders voting for Trump's deed over Tehran's denial. Lloyd's has not repriced Hormuz war-risk cover because its trigger requires a UN Security Council resolution or government certification, so tanker insurance costs remain elevated regardless of the spot move.
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan's Mohsin Naqvi was in Tehran for his second visit in under a week, using the Pakistan-Qatar channel that delivered April's ceasefire after an identical public-denial cycle. The channel carries both civilian and military buy-in from Islamabad, the only configuration Iran's split command cannot dismiss as a partial signal.
India
India
India summoned the US Deputy Chief of Mission after three Indian sailors were killed aboard MT Settebello, the first formal grievance from a major non-belligerent directed at US enforcement. Indian seafarers supply roughly 12 per cent of the global maritime workforce; their presence on third-flag Gulf tankers is structurally inevitable regardless of bilateral diplomacy.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC declared Hormuz closed on 11 June while civilian negotiators were on the same mediation channel, then issued no public comment on the MoU framework. Its silence on the framework, rather than any foreign ministry statement, is the operative approval signal; the corps' unilateral Hormuz closure shows it did not treat the diplomatic track as binding on its operations.
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Esmail Baghaei told IRNA that reports of a finalised deal were 'merely speculation' and that Iran had 'not yet made a final decision'. The denial is structurally identical to Iranian foreign ministry statements during the April ceasefire talks, which produced a binding text within 48 hours of the same language.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump cancelled the third strike day and called the MoU 'very strong' and almost ready to sign, while CENTCOM kept tanker enforcement running in the same 24-hour window. The administration is simultaneously withdrawing the military pressure it claims drove the deal and sustaining the enforcement campaign it is trying to trade away.