Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
3MAY

US strikes four Iranian sites near Hormuz

3 min read
10:26UTC

Donald Trump ordered CENTCOM onto Iranian soil for the first time in 100 days of war, hours after telling reporters a deal was in its 'final throes'.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Trump's first decisive Iran act in 100 days was a missile strike, not the deal he keeps promising.

CENTCOM (US Central Command) struck Iranian air-defence, radar and ground-control sites at Qeshm Island, Bandar Abbas, Sirik and Jask between 22:00 GMT on Tuesday 9 June and 01:00 GMT on Wednesday 10 June, at Donald Trump's direct order 1. For 100 days the US-Iran front had been sanctions and the Strait of Hormuz blockade while Israel did the kinetic work; this was the first American ordnance on Iranian soil since the war began 2. CENTCOM called it a "proportional response" and "self-defence", citing Iran's downing of a US AH-64 Apache helicopter, the aircraft logged "cause unknown" a day earlier and now resolved .

The strike package hit four named sites, yet Al Jazeera, citing Iranian accounts, reported the damage ran to a single telecoms tower at Sirik and two water tanks 3. The kinetic footprint stayed small while the political signal ran large. A target set of coastal air-defence and radar, not Fordow or Natanz, reads as a deliberately survivable strike: Washington demonstrated reach without forcing the all-out nuclear exchange that hitting an enrichment site would compel.

Trump had told reporters on 9 June that an Iran deal was in its "final throes" ; he ordered missiles onto Iranian territory within hours of saying it. The president who signed nothing across 100 days, no AUMF, no Article 51 notice, no nuclear memorandum, answered a stalled negotiation with ordnance rather than paper. What closed the war's defining action-versus-words gap was a missile order, not a signature, which means every legal instrument remains unsigned even now.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The United States military launched air strikes on Iran overnight on 9-10 June 2026. The targets were radar stations and air-defence equipment near the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which a fifth of the world's oil travels. The stated reason was that an American military helicopter, a type called an AH-64 Apache, had gone down near the strait earlier that day. The US President ordered the strikes as retaliation, calling it self-defence. Iran says the radar sites were protecting its own coast. No new permission from the US Congress was sought; the President argued he already had the authority.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The casus belli chain runs from the Apache downing through CENTCOM's 'self-defence' doctrine, but the structural precondition was set earlier: CENTCOM had already struck Iranian radar at Goruk and Qeshm Island in late May and on 31 May to 1 June , establishing a pattern of airspace-denial strikes that Iran had not yet answered with ordnance on American aircraft.

When the Apache went down, CENTCOM's existing strike precedent meant the only doctrinal response it had available was another radar-suppression package.

The deeper root cause is the 100-day gap between the start of hostilities and any signed US legal authority. Defence Secretary Hegseth's May Senate testimony converted Article II self-defence from a fallback into a named policy.

Once it became stated doctrine that no AUMF was required, the threshold for ordering strikes fell to whatever Trump defined as necessary at the moment of decision, with no congressional gate and no UN notification requirement in the administration's own legal theory.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    CENTCOM's 9 June strike package marks the first American ordnance on Iranian sovereign territory since the war began on 28 February, establishing a new threshold Iran now must decide whether to accept or escalate above.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    With no Article 51 notification filed and no AUMF in place, the US legal position on the strikes rests entirely on Trump's Article II self-defence assertion, leaving the action vulnerable to challenge in any subsequent war-powers litigation or allied diplomatic forum.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Degrading Iranian radar and ground-control at four Hormuz-proximate sites reduces Tehran's situational awareness around the strait's chokepoint, potentially increasing Iran's reliance on IRGC missile salvos rather than air-defence coordination as its primary deterrent posture.

    Medium term · Suggested
First Reported In

Update #123 · Trump orders strikes on Iranian soil

Al Jazeera· 10 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Markets
Markets
Brent crude rose 2.2 per cent to $96.34 on 10 June, reversing a 7 per cent weekly decline built on deal optimism, as the overnight exchange repriced the Strait of Hormuz risk premium in a single session. The move reflects transit-risk repricing rather than supply shock: Iran's exports had already collapsed to below 300,000 barrels per day.
Pakistan
Pakistan
Pakistan's Naqvi channel, the only mediation track carrying both civilian and military buy-in, was stress-tested by live ordnance within 48 hours of the 6-7 June Tehran visit. Whether Washington informed Islamabad of the imminent strike plan while Naqvi was in Tehran remains undisclosed, putting the channel's neutrality under scrutiny.
Kuwait
Kuwait
Kuwait hosted the third Iranian strike on its soil since the 3 June airport drone attack, with Ali Al Salem airbase targeted in the three-country salvo. Its recent $1.98 billion Anduril Anvil counter-drone purchase signals it is rearming rather than reconsidering its hosting posture.
Bahrain
Bahrain
Bahrain absorbed the IRGC barrage via PAC-3 intercepts with its magazine already at 87 per cent depletion and no resupply before 2027. Sounding air-raid sirens over Manama, it faced the intercept burden with the thinnest defensive stack in the Gulf coalition.
Jordan
Jordan
Jordan reported all five incoming missiles intercepted with no injuries and no damage, a clean defensive performance that strengthens Amman's case for staying in the Western coalition without escalating its own posture. It now sits on Iran's target list for the first time despite not being a party to the Abraham Accords confrontation.
Iran / IRGC
Iran / IRGC
Foreign Minister Araghchi posted on X that US forces should 'leave our region if you want to be safe' and framed the exchange as a US defeat, while the IRGC claimed 21 targets hit and an F-35 hangar destroyed. The claims serve a domestic and Arab-audience framing rather than a verified battle-damage assessment.