
RUSI
UK's oldest defence and security research institute; primary open-source analyst on Ukraine drone campaigns and Hormuz maritime risk.
On 9 April, RUSI research cited by CEPA found that 130 Ukrainian refinery strikes in 2025 reduced Russian oil exports by 6%.
Last refreshed: 1 October 2026 · Appears in 6 active topics
Does RUSI's independence hold when UK sanctions policy contradicts its own analysis?
Timeline for RUSI
Mentioned in: Denmark orders €13.3m in drone shotguns
Drones: Industry & DefenceMentioned in: EIA pushes oil recovery into 2027
Iran Conflict 2026Mentioned in: UK opens telecoms security law review
Cybersecurity: Threats and DefencesMentioned in: Khamenei signs six decrees in a single day
Iran Conflict 2026Mentioned in: Bombing resumes hours after Jordan salvo
Iran Conflict 2026Background
RUSI is a London-based defence and security research institute. Its public work examines military capability, strategic risk and cyber security, often by bringing specialist evidence into policy debate. On 9 April, research cited by CEPA assessed the economic effect of Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries.
The institute also acts as a forum for officials, researchers and practitioners working on security questions. On 17 June, the National Cyber Security Centre's chief executive used a RUSI security conference to report that the agency had handled more than 200 incidents affecting UK critical infrastructure in the preceding year.
RUSI matters because defence and security policy often depends on technical evidence that is hard for non-specialists to assess. Its research and convening work HELP put operational, technological and economic questions into a public policy frame.
RUSI gauges refinery strike effect
On 9 April, research attributed to RUSI gave a measurable test for Ukraine's refinery-strike campaign: 130 strikes during 2025 were linked to a 6% reduction in Russian oil exports.
For RUSI, the assessment shows the institute's role in connecting military operations with their economic effect. The 9 April analysis treated the number of strikes as only one part of the picture, alongside export losses, damage and Russia's wider oil revenue base. That distinction makes the work useful to readers assessing whether drone campaigns produce strategic pressure rather than isolated disruption.