Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
24SEP

Texas PAC's Senate spending hits $131.5m

3 min read
11:45UTC

Texas PAC reported $61.4 million of new spending against James Talarico and for Ken Paxton on 30 September, nearly doubling its race total in nine days.

PoliticsAssessed
Key takeaway

TEXAS PAC's spending in the Texas Senate race nearly doubled in nine days to $131.5 million.

TEXAS PAC (a super political action committee, or Super PAC) filed a spending notice with the FEC (the Federal Election Commission) on 30 September covering $61,413,929.82 in nine lines, FEC file 2015764⁠1. Such a notice falls due within two days of spending above the reporting threshold. A Super PAC may raise and spend without limit but may not coordinate with a candidate, and TEXAS PAC is spending in the Senate race between Republican Ken Paxton and Democrat James Talarico.

Its two largest lines, both paid to Flexpoint Media and dated 24 September, were $28.26 million opposing Talarico and $27.94 million supporting Paxton. The committee's race total is now $131,529,652.10, up from $69.32 million as of 21 September, which means it nearly doubled in nine days. Its first periodic report, due on 15 October, must name the donors behind it.

MAGA Inc (Make America Great Again Inc), Donald Trump's main Super PAC, filed $5 million of streaming television advertising against Talarico on 26 September. Republican-side outside money in filings since 24 September runs about $71.4 million to $9.6 million, roughly 7.4 to 1. The Democratic side is led by Lone Star Rising PAC's $7.21 million against Paxton, about an eighth of TEXAS PAC's single report.

Cook Political Report moved the Texas governor's race, Republican Greg Abbott against Democrat Gina Hinojosa, from Likely to Lean Republican on 1 October, a week after Sabato's Crystal Ball made the same move⁠2. Both raters now put Abbott's seat one step from Toss-up. In the same note Cook wrote that Democrats could win a majority of governorships for the first time since 2010.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

A Super PAC is a political group that can raise and spend unlimited money on adverts, so long as it does not coordinate with a candidate. It must tell the Federal Election Commission (FEC) when it spends, but it names its donors only on a fixed calendar. TEXAS PAC is backing Republican Ken Paxton, the state attorney general, against Democrat James Talarico for a US Senate seat. It has now told the FEC it spent $131.5 million on this race. We will not know who gave TEXAS PAC that money until it files its first full report, due on 15 October.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

TEXAS PAC can spend nine figures before naming a donor because of how FEC deadlines fall. A new committee files spending notices within days of each ad going out, but it lists who paid only on periodic reports. TEXAS PAC's first such report is due on 15 October.

The committee already reported $69.32m by 21 September, and with No Going Back PAC had reported more than $85m in one week in mid-September while naming no donor. The pattern is a timing gap built into the disclosure calendar rather than a breach of it.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Texas PAC's donors become public on 15 October, after more than $131m has already been spent in the race.

  • Meaning

    MAGA Inc's $5m against Talarico puts Donald Trump's main super PAC alongside Texas PAC in the race.

First Reported In

Update #19 · Bulk voter citizenship checks are back

Federal Election Commission· 1 Oct 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
University of Florida Election Lab
University of Florida Election Lab
The lab, run by Michael McDonald, estimates about 124.3 million ballots, a raw midterm record, and turnout of about 49.4% of eligible voters, second to 2018's 50.05%. The raw record reflects population growth more than a record rate, so the late count is working through a near-2018 electorate.
Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson
Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson
Ron Johnson backed the failed 31-15 motion to delay Thune's re-election, after activists such as Mike Cernovich blamed the leader for the defeat. Their complaint is that Republicans could have passed the SAVE Act; in January it meets a Democratic Senate instead.
Senator John Thune
Senator John Thune
Thune was re-elected Senate Republican leader by acclamation on 10 November after a motion to delay failed 31-15. He kept the filibuster that stopped the SAVE Act, the choice his critics on the right blame for the defeat.
House Republicans under Jim Jordan
House Republicans under Jim Jordan
House Republicans elected Jordan minority leader by 106 votes to 73 over Steve Scalise on 10 November, after Speaker Mike Johnson declined to run. They replaced the leadership that lost the majority, while Senate Republicans kept theirs.
Donald Trump
Donald Trump
Trump asked on Truth Social on 9 November whether anybody believed the election "was honest" and blamed the machines, having told The New York Times on polling night he would accept the results. No Republican campaign had sued over a 2026 result by 10 November, so the claim has no case behind it.
Judge David O. Carter
Judge David O. Carter
Carter closed the Justice Department's suit over about 20,000 California mail ballots on 10 November after the department withdrew it, writing that the suit "attempted to disrupt an ongoing election". The closure leaves the department with no court order touching a 2026 California ballot.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.