Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
7AUG

Iran hits Jordan and three Gulf states

2 min read
12:08UTC

Iran fired ten missiles at Jordan's Azraq base on 9 July and struck Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar the same day, the war's widest single-day spread, yet oil and Washington's paper trail both stayed flat.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Iran struck four countries in a day and threatened the UAE, yet Washington's paper and oil both stayed flat.

Iran fired ten ballistic missiles at Jordan's Azraq air base, which hosts US troops and aircraft, on 9 July; Jordan reported eight intercepted and no casualties. 1 The same day the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) struck Bahrain's Fifth Fleet headquarters, Kuwait and Qatar with one-way attack drones and missiles, and targeted a Patriot interceptor battery, a mobile surface-to-air missile unit, on Qatari soil. 2

Jordan is the first non-Gulf, no-coastline partner drawn onto the strike map, extending a retaliation that through 8 July had run as a US-Iran and Gulf-coastal exchange . Bahrain's interior ministry ordered residents to shelter and sirens sounded, while Kuwait shut its Flight Information Region (FIR), the block of airspace it controls, to all but vetted arrivals. 3 The IRGC named the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as its next target if US strikes continue. 4

Two systems that normally price escalation stayed still. Across 8 to 10 July The White House signed only an aircraft-tariff proclamation, unrelated to the war it was prosecuting, and nothing on Iran. 5 Trump had already called the 16 June ceasefire memorandum over , but a Truth Social line is not a signed instrument.

One reading holds the flat signals correct: Jordan stopped eight of ten missiles, no one died, and the Doha channel is paused rather than dead. 6 Aviation authorities lean the same way, reopening Qatar's Doha FIR to near-normal within a day and leaving Kuwait's as the only Gulf airspace still shut. 7 The named Army dead and the strait's near-closure still show real cost accruing inside that bounded exchange, so "contained" reads as a market bet rather than a settled fact.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard Corps, known as the IRGC, fired missiles and drones at four countries in a single day: Jordan, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar, and warned a fifth, the United Arab Emirates, that it could be next. What makes this notable is Jordan, since unlike the Gulf states it has no coastline on the waterway Iran has been fighting over and no direct role in the standoff. It was hit simply because it hosts American troops and aircraft at Azraq air base. Jordan's air defences shot down eight of the ten missiles fired at it and nobody was killed, but the message was clear: any country that hosts US forces is now a potential target, whatever its relationship to the original dispute.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Jordan's exposure is structural, not political: Azraq hosts US aircraft under bilateral defence arrangements that predate this conflict and have nothing to do with Hormuz, oil transit or the Gulf littoral dispute driving the rest of the war.

Once Iran treats hosting US forces as the qualifying condition for a target, rather than bordering the Gulf or profiting from the blockade, every basing partner from Jordan to a prospective UAE becomes reachable regardless of its role in the underlying dispute.

The same logic explains the explicit UAE threat. Abu Dhabi has no direct stake in the Hormuz standoff but hosts US forces, which is now sufficient grounds for inclusion on Iran's list.

Escalation

Untested: the IRGC has named the UAE as a fifth target but has not yet struck it. Whether that threat is acted on will show whether Iran is still expanding geographically or has reached the edge of its intended spread.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    Iran has established that hosting US forces, not Gulf geography, is now the qualifying condition for inclusion on its target list.

  • Risk

    A struck UAE would be the fifth country hit in the current wave and the second, after Jordan, with no direct Hormuz stake.

First Reported In

Update #151 · Iran widens war to Jordan; oil shrugs

The Times of Israel· 10 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.