Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
19JUL

Rezaei sets Iran's price for Hormuz

3 min read
14:05UTC

Mohsen Rezaei told China's ambassador on 11 August that the Strait of Hormuz reopens only when the United States ends its war and releases Iran's blocked funds. Pakistan and Qatar spent the same day calling the talks advanced.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Iran's security council chief raised the price for reopening Hormuz and dismissed the Oman transit track.

Mohsen Rezaei told China's ambassador Zong Piyu in Tehran on Tuesday 11 August that the Strait of Hormuz reopens when the United States ends its war on Iran and its regional allies and releases Iran's blocked funds, and that Tehran has passed further conditions to Washington through intermediaries 1. Rezaei runs the Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), the Iranian body that turns a negotiated text into state policy. He took it over on 9 August . This was his first public word on the strait since.

He also cut the mediators loose. The Iran-Oman transit arrangement "will have no impact" on the reopening decision, he said. That puts him at odds with his own foreign ministry, where Esmaeil Baqaei spent Monday 10 August naming the four areas Muscat and Tehran have agreed and ruling transit fees out . Abbas Araghchi's Hormuz draft has been waiting on Rezaei's council since 5 August and remains unsigned. He has gone beyond the six conditions his predecessor Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr published on 8 August , adding an end to the American naval blockade.

The mediators spent the same day describing a different negotiation. Pakistan's defence minister Khawaja Asif said things are "shaping up in favor of peace" on the strait, and a Qatari foreign ministry spokesperson called the Iran-Oman talks on reopening to some shipping advanced 2. Neither names a text, a date or a mechanism. Rezaei names the council, the conditions and the man who has to meet them.

A charterer reading both accounts cannot price either, so optimism from Islamabad and Doha moves no war-risk rate. Tehran has now said in public, through the office that decides, that the shipping track is not the one that matters.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Mohsen Rezaei, a senior Iranian security official, told China's ambassador that Iran will not reopen the Strait of Hormuz (the narrow sea passage a fifth of the world's oil travels through) until the US ends its war on Iran and its allies and unfreezes Iran's blocked money. He said a separate set of talks between Iran and Oman about the strait does not affect that decision. On the same day, officials from Pakistan and Qatar, two countries trying to help end the war, both said things were looking hopeful on Hormuz. Neither gave any details, and their comments do not match what Rezaei just said.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Iran signed but never ratified the international treaty guaranteeing transit passage through straits, leaving Tehran's closure and reopening claims resting on domestic authority rather than an instrument it can enforce in law. That gap is why the decision can plausibly sit with either the SNSC or the foreign ministry: no treaty obligation forces Iran to recognise one channel as binding.

Rezaei's appointment to the SNSC on 9 August replaced Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, who moved to an advisory role; a security-council chief with a military rather than diplomatic background, drawn from the IRGC's own command line, is structurally more likely to frame Hormuz as a security instrument than a shipping-lane technicality.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Rezaei's rejection of the Iran-Oman track as irrelevant to reopening creates a public contradiction with Pakistani and Qatari mediators describing that same track as advanced, which could stall the mediation both sides say they want.

  • Meaning

    Rezaei's appointment brings a career IRGC commander into the role that decides Hormuz policy, replacing a predecessor now in an advisory capacity, which shifts the decision away from Iran's diplomatic track and toward its security establishment.

First Reported In

Update #169 · The war moved from the air to the water

Mehr News Agency· 12 Aug 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China's foreign ministry
China's foreign ministry
Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Iraq's government and Erbil authorities
Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.
Bahrain Defence Force
Bahrain Defence Force
The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry
KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.
Jordan's Armed Forces
Jordan's Armed Forces
Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.
CENTCOM
CENTCOM
CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.