Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
18JUL

Iran charts Hormuz with formal PGSA coordinates

4 min read
13:17UTC

Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority published the formal coordinates of its Hormuz controlled zone on 20 May: eastern boundary from Kuh-e Mubarak to Fujairah, western boundary from Qeshm to Umm Al-Quwain, with all vessels inside required to obtain authorisation.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Once coordinates are published, neighbours and underwriters must respond on paper or accept by silence. Tehran has forced that choice.

Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA, the Iranian maritime body administering the toll architecture) published the formal coordinates of its "controlled maritime zone" on Wednesday 20 May 1. The eastern boundary runs from Kuh-e Mubarak on the Iranian coast to southern Fujairah in the UAE; the western boundary runs from the tip of Qeshm Island in Iran to Umm Al-Quwain in the UAE. All vessels inside the zone, per the Iran International notice, must coordinate with the authority and obtain authorisation. PGSA has opened its vessel-submission portal four days earlier and is still withholding the fee schedule it promised .

The coordinates convert what had been operational practice and the Majlis's earlier toll bill into a cartographic-legal claim. Verbal declarations of authority can be walked back; published coordinates cannot, because they trigger a written obligation on neighbours and flag states. The United Arab Emirates has not, as of writing, published a counter-coordinate set, which leaves Emirati silence as a maritime-law response.

The insurance consequence runs through Lloyd's of London. Until Wednesday, underwriters had a verbal toll claim and a portal whose fee schedule remained unwritten. With coordinates on a chart, the boundary can be modelled: tanker routes can be plotted against the zone, war-risk premium tiers can be drawn against entry and exit lines, and the structural insurance layer Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley flagged on 12 May now has the cartographic input it needs to price.

Tehran chose to publish coordinates while withholding the fee, and the asymmetry reads as deliberate. The chart converts the zone into a legal fact; the missing fee preserves Iranian discretion over what compliance actually costs. Flag states and underwriters now have to accept or reject the cartography on paper, while Tehran retains the room to set the price later.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's newly formed Persian Gulf Strait Authority published precise GPS-style boundary coordinates for the maritime zone it says it controls at the Strait of Hormuz. This is the narrow waterway through which roughly 20% of the world's oil passes. Before this, Iran had made verbal statements claiming it had authority over ships passing through. Publishing exact coordinates is a significant step up: it creates a written, mappable boundary that other countries and shipping companies now have to formally respond to or ignore on the record. Iran is saying: all ships inside this zone need to get our permission. It has not yet published what it will charge for that permission, which appears deliberate; Iran gets the legal claim on paper while keeping flexibility on the price. Shipping insurers and naval commanders now have a specific map they must account for, even if they do not accept its legal validity.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    Flag states that do not publish formal counter-coordinates within 90 days risk having their silence interpreted as acquiescence under customary international law. The UAE, as a state whose own coastline provides two of the PGSA zone's four boundary reference points, faces the most immediate pressure to respond on paper.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    Lloyd's of London underwriters now have the cartographic input needed to model war-risk premiums against specific vessel entry and exit points in the declared zone. The coordinate publication enables tiered premium structures; vessels transiting the zone pay a higher premium than vessels skirting the boundary; which partially implements the insurance-layer effect of the PGSA architecture without Iranian enforcement.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    The withheld fee schedule creates a second-stage legal moment: when PGSA publishes its tariff, flag states and Rubio's 'completely illegal' position will face a concrete enforcement test. The coordinate publication without a fee is a deliberate staging that preserves Iranian discretion on timing.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #105 · Khamenei keeps the uranium; House pulls the vote

Iran International· 22 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and war-risk insurers
Shipping and war-risk insurers
War-risk premiums for Hormuz transits reached 3 to 10 per cent of hull value on 17 July, against 0.25 per cent before the war, as Brent cleared $87 and daily transits fell to eight vessels. Underwriters are pricing the confirmed UKMTO mine near the Traffic Separation Scheme, not the IRGC's unconfirmed 18 July mining claim, which CENTCOM called false.
Oman
Oman
Abbas Araghchi led an Iranian delegation to Oman-hosted talks in Muscat on 18 July, an agenda confined to reopening the Strait of Hormuz and nothing else. Oman's decades of studied neutrality make it the one channel neither Washington nor Tehran needs to be seen initiating, and that narrowness is what lets it survive the bombing.
Kuwait
Kuwait
Kuwait's electricity ministry asked residents to ration water and power after the IRGC set Shuaiba's generating units alight on 17 July, the second Kuwaiti site struck in two days. The country draws 90 per cent of its drinking water from plants sharing power infrastructure, so one strike reaches every tap in the hottest weeks of the year.
Jordan
Jordan
Amman still reports no casualties or damage of its own from the 17 July attack even as CENTCOM confirmed two American dead on the same runway, a line it has not amended since. Hosting the base that produced the war's first US fatalities puts Jordan's decades-old defence arrangement with Washington under a domestic scrutiny it has not faced before.
Tehran / Artesh and AEOI
Tehran / Artesh and AEOI
Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation called the alleged Darkhovin strike a violation of international law, while the Artesh put Operation Saeqeh, its campaign against Kuwait, Jordan and Bahrain, at phases 14 and 15 by 18 July. Domestic outlets Fars and Tabnak claim 16 Americans dead since February, a toll no source outside Iran supports.
CENTCOM / Washington
CENTCOM / Washington
CENTCOM confirmed two dead and one missing at Muwaffaq Salti on 17 July, when Jordan says its air defences intercepted eight of ten incoming missiles, against five of five stopped on 10 June. Its own strikes stay aimed at Iran's coast, interior and navy, not the Artesh campaign that killed them.