23JUN

Brent crude recovers from post-ceasefire low

2 min read

11:42UTC

Brent crude traded at $96.39 on Friday morning, recovered from its post-ceasefire low of $94.41 reached after the 15 to 16 per cent single-day drop on 8 April. Markets are pricing the structural stalemate, not resolution.

← Back to Trump's first Iran paper is an oil licence Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictDeveloping

Key takeaway

Markets are pricing the ceasefire as a ceiling on disruption, not a floor under relief.

Brent Crude traded at $96.39 on Friday morning 11 April, recovered from its post-ceasefire low of $94.41 reached after the 15 to 16 per cent single-day drop on 8 April . The recovery reflects market pricing of the structural stalemate rather than confidence in resolution.

The Kpler-projected ceiling of 10 to 15 Hormuz transits per day implies persistent spot-market tightness. Pre-war daily throughput was 120 to 140. Insurance markets will continue pricing transit at war-risk premiums until a credible mine-clearance timeline emerges, which will not happen inside the current diplomatic format. For households in fuel-import-dependent economies, the ceasefire has not yet lowered pump prices, and the physics of the strait suggests it will not do so on any timeline the Islamabad talks can deliver.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Oil prices bounced back slightly to $96.39 after dipping to a post-ceasefire low of $94.41. The ceasefire caused a brief fall because markets hoped the strait would reopen — but that hope faded quickly as it became clear the physical blockage (uncharted mines, inspection regime, no insurance) would not be resolved by a political announcement. Markets are now pricing in what analysts call a 'structural stalemate': oil prices will stay elevated because the physical problem is not going away. That means petrol, heating bills, and freight costs remain significantly higher than before the war started, regardless of which way the Islamabad talks go.

Source Landscape

This story draws on centre-left-leaning sources from Qatar

Qatar

At $96.39, Brent remains 43% above its $67.41 pre-war baseline. The Goldman Sachs $90 Q2 forecast implies a modest further softening if the ceasefire holds, but the $100+ trigger if Hormuz stays restricted is the operative scenario given the Kpler 10-15 transit ceiling.

Insurance is the transmission mechanism the price level rarely discusses: war-risk premiums for Hormuz transit are currently 0.5-1.5% of vessel value per voyage — roughly $3-9 million per VLCC transit versus near-zero pre-war. Those premiums are borne by cargo owners and passed to refinery buyers, creating a structural floor on refined product prices in Europe and Asia independent of the headline Brent number.

Consensus view: Goldman Sachs (Q2 forecast $90 with $100+ flagged if Hormuz remains restricted) and Kpler's Ana Subasic both price the recovery as market acknowledgement of a structural stalemate, not diplomatic progress. Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group observed that the US 'handed Iran a weapon of mass disruption' — a permanent Hormuz toll infrastructure the ceasefire has not removed .

Counter-view: Arab Center Washington DC analysts note that the shadow fleet volume that built during pre-war Iranian sanctions has partially decoupled Gulf crude from Brent pricing for Chinese and Indian end-buyers: the Brent price premium overstates the supply disruption for two-thirds of pre-war Hormuz volume by buyer geography.

Key tension: Whether Brent's $94-97 range represents a sustainable war-stalemate equilibrium or an unstable ceiling that collapses if GL-U lapse on 19 April triggers a fresh insurance market withdrawal.

Sources:Al Jazeera

Mentions:Kpler →shadow fleet →Iran →Islamabad →Washington →International Crisis Group →Ali Vaez →Ana Subasic →Goldman Sachs →India →Brent Crude →General License U →Strait of Hormuz →

First Reported In

Update #65 · Iran lost its own minefield

Al Jazeera· 11 Apr 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

This Event

Brent crude recovers from post-ceasefire low

The recovery implies fuel prices stay 40 to 60 per cent above pre-war levels regardless of which diplomatic scenario plays out, locking in an inflation floor across fuel-import-dependent economies.

Led to

Brent holds at $95 as markets wait

Brent at $96.39 (ID:2211) held essentially flat to the $95.20-$96.69 range on 11-12 April, confirming sustained market pricing of the conflict stalemate.

Occurred 12 Apr 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

Shipping and insurance industry

UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.

European refiners

European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.

Saudi Arabia

Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.

Qatar

Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.

Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)

Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.

Russia and China

Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.