Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group characterised six weeks of war in a single sentence: "In the attempt to prevent Iran from developing a weapon of mass destruction, the US handed Iran a weapon of mass disruption" 1. Vaez is one of the few named analysts to have called both the initial Hormuz closure and the toll system's permanence in advance, which gives the framing weight beyond the soundbite. The structural inversion he is describing is concrete: the leverage Washington went to war to remove has instead been codified into Iranian domestic law and projected outwards through a working customs system. The weapon Vaez names is the one Tehran is now asking the US to legally ratify .
7APR
Vaez: a weapon of mass disruption
1 min read
10:19UTC
Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group summarised six weeks of war in a single sentence: in trying to deny Iran a weapon of mass destruction, the US handed it a weapon of mass disruption.
ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway
The leverage the US went to war to remove has been codified into Iranian law and projected outwards.
Deep Analysis
In plain English
Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group , one of the few analysts who correctly called the Hormuz closure and the toll system's permanence , summarised the war in a single sentence: the US went to war to stop Iran building a weapon of mass destruction, and in doing so handed Iran a weapon of mass disruption. The weapon he means is the Hormuz toll system: a working customs authority over the world's most important oil chokepoint, codified into Iranian domestic law, already collecting revenue from French and Japanese ships. The leverage the US meant to remove has instead been legally embedded. That is what Iran is now asking Washington to ratify.
What could happen next?
- Meaning
Vaez's framing captures the structural inversion that has occurred: the war's stated objective , removing Iran's leverage , has instead produced the codification of a new and durable form of leverage that will outlast any ceasefire arrangement not explicitly structured to dismantle it.
First Reported In
Update #61 · Carriers retreat; Iran codifies Hormuz
Forces News· 7 Apr 2026
Read original →Different Perspectives
Oil traders
Sent Brent down 2.29 per cent to $98.38 a barrel on reports that mediation was reviving, moving the price on CENTCOM's quiet night rather than on Trump's same-day promise of a bigger operation with no deadline attached.
Iran
An Iranian official called the same mediation account completely misleading, denying it received any US proposal via Baghdad on the same day Iraq denied delivering one, leaving neither denial able to settle what actually passed between the two capitals.
Iraq
Called groundless the New York Times account that its prime minister carried a US ceasefire proposal to Tehran, a denial that also protects Baghdad's effort to avoid becoming a party to a war fought by aircraft it does not control.
OHCHR
Recorded 17 civilian seafarer deaths since the war began, a population neither the Pentagon nor Iran's Health Ministry counts in its own tally, and called for urgent action on 6,000 crew stranded across roughly 400 vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.
Houthis
Enforced the blockade on Saudi-linked shipping it declared on 20 July by hitting the NCC Masa and then an Aramco facility at Jazan, moving from radio warnings to strikes on land after four days without a confirmed hit.
Saudi Arabia
Struck Houthi military sites near Hodeidah the same day the NCC Masa was hit, while its coalition spokesman insisted Hodeidah, Ras Issa and Salif all remain open to navigation. The distinction protects the ports Yemen's population depends on for food and fuel even while punishing the group behind the tanker strike.