Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
14JUN

Brent settles $105.30 with no fresh seizure

3 min read
11:42UTC

Brent crude settled at $105.30 on 25 April with intraday prints above $106 and a weekly gain of roughly 18%. The talks collapse alone is now the bullish driver, not fresh kinetics.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent at $105 has been repriced as the baseline; future incidents push from there, not from $67.

Brent crude settled at $105.30 on 25 April with intraday prints above $106 and a weekly gain of roughly 18% per The National 1. This is the second consecutive session above $105, 57% above the $67.41 pre-war baseline and a continuation from the $105.73 close on 24 April . No new IRGC seizure occurred on 25 April, and the dark-shipping picture from the Larak-Qeshm carve-out was unchanged.

The price moved on the absence of a diplomatic resolution rather than on a fresh provocation. That is a structural shift: the market has stopped treating each diplomatic failure as a temporary setback and is pricing the absence of a resolution track as the default scenario. The repricing matters because future seizures will now push the price from $105 rather than from $67, amplifying the economic shock of any tactical escalation. UK and European pump prices follow Brent with a one-to-two-week lag.

The options curve confirms the shift. With the baseline reset, any de-escalation announcement becomes disproportionately bearish rather than merely corrective, which makes the political incentive structure for Tehran and Washington asymmetric: Iran loses revenue floor on a deal, and US consumer pump prices ease only after a deal is concrete enough to clear forwards. Brent at $105 is the new floor, not a ceiling.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The price of oil affects almost everything: petrol at the pump, heating bills, the cost of goods moved by truck or ship. The benchmark price for much of the world's oil is called 'Brent crude', named after a North Sea oil field. Before the Iran war began, Brent was around $67 a barrel. On 25 April it closed at $105.30. That is a rise of nearly 57%, and it happened in under two months. Oil markets usually react strongly to specific events (a ship seized, a factory bombed). What is significant about Saturday's price is that nothing new happened: no IRGC boarding, no strike, no military escalation. The price stayed above $105 purely because traders stopped believing the war would end soon. When the diplomacy collapses and traders update their expectations, prices move even without a physical event.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Each Islamabad channel failure narrows the oil market's probability distribution around a near-term diplomatic resolution. When Islamabad 3 collapsed via Trump's Truth Social post, traders priced the event harder than a formal diplomatic postponement would have warranted, because a social-media cancellation carries no institutional machinery for reversal.

The ceasefire is nominally in force, but CENTCOM's interdiction count reached 33 on 25 April while the naval blockade continues. Traders have concluded that a nominal ceasefire does not translate to resumed Hormuz commercial transit. Until a deal explicitly addresses the blockade, the $38/bbl structural premium over the pre-war baseline persists regardless of individual daily incident counts.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    European and Asian central banks running quarterly inflation assessments in May will incorporate $105+ Brent into their forecasts, likely deferring planned interest rate cuts by one to two quarters.

  • Risk

    Goldman Sachs's $120 Q3 severe scenario becomes the base case rather than the tail risk if both the Islamabad diplomatic track and the AUMF congressional track fail before 1 May.

First Reported In

Update #79 · Islamabad 3 collapses; Witkoff grounded, talks stall

Al Jazeera· 25 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Qatar (mediator)
Qatar (mediator)
Qatari negotiators flew to Tehran on Sunday morning to close remaining gaps between the parties, operating as the primary shuttle channel. Qatar's role is to bridge the civilian-track gap the IRGC veto has left.
IAEA / Rafael Grossi
IAEA / Rafael Grossi
Grossi replied to Araghchi's 13 June protection-of-materials letter the same day, citing Iran's NPT Safeguards Agreement obligation to declare any nuclear material transfer. With 97 days of lost inspector access and approximately 240 kg unaccounted, Grossi has treaty text and no inspectors on the ground to enforce it.
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
The UAE state oil company assessed full Hormuz flows will not resume until 2027 even with a fast deal, citing demining, inspection, and insurance timelines. The UAE ambassador to Washington said a simple ceasefire is not enough.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC ran naval exercises in Hormuz during Geneva talks and its political deputy declared Iran was negotiating from a position of strength. The corps has not endorsed the MoU; by amplifying Mashhad protests through Fars, it is framing any deal as conditions it imposed rather than a concession it accepted.
Iran Foreign Ministry / Araghchi
Iran Foreign Ministry / Araghchi
Araghchi's dilute-in-Iran red line was met by the US concession, but his foreign ministry spokesman said Tehran had not taken a final decision and a signing might come in days, not Sunday. Araghchi separately wrote to the IAEA pledging to protect nuclear materials as dilution negotiations advanced.
White House / US negotiating team
White House / US negotiating team
Washington accepted dilution inside Iran rather than ship-out, its first substantive material concession in 106 days, the New York Times reported. With the White House register blank and the ceremony slipped a third weekend, the administration has moved its negotiating position without yet producing a document.