Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
12JUN

Iran's deal waits on a leader unseen since March

3 min read
09:18UTC

The MoU awaits a decision from Mojtaba Khamenei, unseen in public since early March; analysts at the Stimson and Soufan centres assess IRGC commanders now hold day-to-day authority over the war.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

With the supreme leader unseen since March, the corps that shut Hormuz now decides whether any deal survives.

Mojtaba Khamenei has not appeared in public since early March, more than three months after being named Iran's supreme leader and wounded in the 28 February strike that killed his father. He has governed since through written statements relayed by state media. Pakistan's interior minister Mohsin Naqvi carried dual civilian and military letters to him in Tehran on 6-7 June ; more than three months on, no public response has come, and the MOU reportedly still waits on his word.

Thomas Juneau of the Stimson Center and analysts at The Soufan Center assess that IRGC commanders now hold day-to-day authority over the war, exceeding the supreme leader's. The Naqvi channel, on that reading, routes letters to a figure who may no longer be the decision node, while the corps acts on its own initiative. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, the civilian negotiator, has been overruled by the corps before.

The Hormuz closure supplies the proof. A military command that can shut the strait the same week its government's mediators are pressing for a deal is the command that decides whether any deal holds, whatever the absent leader eventually signs. The question is no longer whether Tehran wants an agreement; it is whether the part of Tehran that wants one can deliver the part that is fighting.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, is the country's most powerful official on paper, with constitutional authority above the president and parliament. He was appointed in March 2026 after his father was killed in a February air strike. He was wounded in the same attack and has not appeared in public since early March. Pakistan is trying to help broker a peace deal and has sent a senior official to deliver letters from both Pakistani civilian and military leaders to Khamenei. But there has been no public response. Analysts watching Iran closely believe the military commanders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) are actually making the day-to-day war decisions, not Khamenei. That creates a big problem for any peace negotiation: the person the deal needs to sign off may not be the one with authority to make it stick.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Mojtaba Khamenei was appointed supreme leader on 7 March in an emergency online session of the Assembly of Experts after the Qom headquarters was destroyed. At least eight members boycotted, citing IRGC pressure and Mojtaba's lack of the marja theological credentials required by Article 109 of Iran's constitution.

The constitutional legitimacy deficit combined with physical injury means his authority over the corps rests on IRGC political endorsement rather than constitutional mandate, inverting the normal relationship between the supreme leader and the military.

The parallel command problem is amplified by the Naqvi channel's structure. Pakistan's mediation routes through civilian interlocutors (Foreign Minister Araghchi) as well as military ones (Field Marshal Asim Munir's equivalent letters).

But the 11 June Hormuz closure shows the IRGC acting independently of both channels on the same week the civilian mediators were pressing for a deal. The two-track structure, civilian plus military mediation, does not resolve to a single authoritative answer if the corps command overrides whatever the civilians agree to.

Escalation

Stable but structurally dangerous. The IRGC holding day-to-day authority without a functioning supreme-leader endorsement mechanism means there is no single escalation decision node that a mediator can reach. Any deal needs corps buy-in that no external mediator currently has direct access to.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If Khamenei's incapacity is permanent or worsens, a formal succession process under Article 111 of Iran's constitution must convene the Assembly of Experts. With the Qom headquarters destroyed and the assembly's authority contested, a second wartime succession would create a deeper legitimacy crisis inside Iran.

    Medium term · Assessed
  • Consequence

    The Pakistan mediation channel, structured around delivering letters to Khamenei, addresses a figurehead while the IRGC military council makes operational decisions. Unless Pakistan or another mediator gains direct access to IRGC commanders, the channel cannot produce a binding ceasefire commitment.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Meaning

    The IRGC closing Hormuz on 11 June, the same week Pakistan pressed for a deal through Khamenei, demonstrates that the corps treats the civilian diplomatic track as parallel to, rather than binding on, its military decisions.

    Immediate · Reported
First Reported In

Update #124 · IRGC declares Hormuz shut; US strikes again

Geo.tv / Stimson Center / Soufan Center· 11 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Brent fell to $89.25 on ceasefire probability, not new barrels, with traders voting for Trump's deed over Tehran's denial. Lloyd's has not repriced Hormuz war-risk cover because its trigger requires a UN Security Council resolution or government certification, so tanker insurance costs remain elevated regardless of the spot move.
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan's Mohsin Naqvi was in Tehran for his second visit in under a week, using the Pakistan-Qatar channel that delivered April's ceasefire after an identical public-denial cycle. The channel carries both civilian and military buy-in from Islamabad, the only configuration Iran's split command cannot dismiss as a partial signal.
India
India
India summoned the US Deputy Chief of Mission after three Indian sailors were killed aboard MT Settebello, the first formal grievance from a major non-belligerent directed at US enforcement. Indian seafarers supply roughly 12 per cent of the global maritime workforce; their presence on third-flag Gulf tankers is structurally inevitable regardless of bilateral diplomacy.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC declared Hormuz closed on 11 June while civilian negotiators were on the same mediation channel, then issued no public comment on the MoU framework. Its silence on the framework, rather than any foreign ministry statement, is the operative approval signal; the corps' unilateral Hormuz closure shows it did not treat the diplomatic track as binding on its operations.
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Esmail Baghaei told IRNA that reports of a finalised deal were 'merely speculation' and that Iran had 'not yet made a final decision'. The denial is structurally identical to Iranian foreign ministry statements during the April ceasefire talks, which produced a binding text within 48 hours of the same language.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump cancelled the third strike day and called the MoU 'very strong' and almost ready to sign, while CENTCOM kept tanker enforcement running in the same 24-hour window. The administration is simultaneously withdrawing the military pressure it claims drove the deal and sustaining the enforcement campaign it is trying to trade away.