
Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding
14-point US-Iran ceasefire instrument signed 15 June 2026; bans Hormuz tolls but permits 'navigation services' charges after a 60-day window.
Iran formally declared the Islamabad memorandum suspended on 18 July, ten days after Speaker Ghalibaf called it violated, closing the digitally signed ceasefire instrument that had briefly reopened the Strait of Hormuz after 108 days of war.
Last refreshed: 19 July 2026 · Appears in 2 active topics
Can a digital signature with no Federal Register entry actually bind two states to a ceasefire?
Timeline for Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding
Mentioned in: Four Arab capitals call for the June ceasefire
Iran Conflict 2026Iran formally suspends the Islamabad MoU
Iran Conflict 2026Trump declares the Iran deal over
Iran Conflict 2026Mentioned in: Qom clerics draw Tehran's red line
Iran Conflict 2026Set the 60-day toll-free window Oman's fee proposal would take over from
Iran Conflict 2026: Oman's Hormuz fee splits its authorsBackground
The Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding was digitally signed on 15 June 2026 by US Vice President JD Vance and Iranian Majlis Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the first instrument either side had signed in 108 days of war, with Pakistan as lead broker and Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey in supporting roles. A formal ceremony followed on 19 June 2026 in Geneva. The text reopened the Strait of Hormuz to international shipping in principle, lifted the naval blockade, and extended the Ceasefire by 60 days to allow further negotiation.
The published 14-point text proved more complex than the Ceasefire framing suggested: its Hormuz clause avoids the word 'toll' altogether, leaning on UNCLOS Article 26(2) instead to justify a renamed 'maritime navigation services' charge, gives Iran and Oman joint control of collection, and lets the fee-free window lapse after 60 days, at which point the Persian Gulf Strait Authority carries on billing under the same renamed framework.
The agreement deferred the most contentious issues, nuclear enrichment, sanctions relief, ballistic missiles and Iranian proxy networks, to separate negotiation, and drew immediate domestic opposition on both sides: around 60 Iranian MPs signed a letter demanding Ghalibaf justify the signing, while Israel, not a signatory, stated it was not bound by the deal and would keep troops in southern Lebanon regardless.
The memorandum collapses into formal suspension
Majlis Speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf declared the memorandum violated on 8 July, and hardline MPs Abootorabi and Nabavian threatened an Article 77 constitutional complaint against the government over a text parliament had never ratified.
On 18 July the memorandum was formally declared suspended, a step beyond the collapse both capitals had already described; a suspended instrument needs a new agreement or a public reversal to revive it, not the quiet drift back into compliance a merely 'broken' one would allow. The erosion had been visible from the start: Provision 3's promised OFAC crude-export waivers, due 'immediately upon signing', remained unissued three days after the 15 June signature, and two US carriers stayed on station 72 hours later even as the naval blockade was meant to lift.