Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Tech Sovereignty
18JUN

Trump calls off the Sunday strike

3 min read
09:28UTC

Trump billed the strike as "Military Terror, Strength, and Power not seen since World War II", then dropped it after Mohammed bin Salman argued the Gulf would wear Iran's answer.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

A Saudi phone call stopped an American strike that Congress and the Pentagon could not.

Donald Trump cancelled a strike on Iran set for Sunday 2 August, hours after posting on Truth Social that the United States was "locked and loaded and ready to go against the Islamic Republic of Iran, at levels of Military Terror, Strength, and Power not seen since World War II" 1. He held off at the request of Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, according to the Associated Press account carried by Al Jazeera 2. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman made the case himself, telling Trump that an Iranian answer landing on Gulf states would reach the global economy 3. By Trump's own telling, unnamed Iranian officials asked for the halt as well 4.

Every previous brake on this campaign came from inside the American government. General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, warned Trump about munitions stocks in late July and the bombing stopped . The Senate then refused to bind the President under the War Powers Resolution , the 1973 statute that gives a president two days to notify Congress he has sent forces into hostilities and 60 days to bring them home without its authorisation. This halt carries a foreign head of state's name instead, which changes who a shipowner, an insurer or a Gulf finance ministry has to lobby to move an American strike calendar.

Trump set out his terms in capitals: "immediate, complete, and total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT" and an end to Iran's nuclear threat 5 6. Wire accounts put the American side of that trade as lifting the naval blockade and letting Iran sell oil again, which is the reporting's reading of an implied exchange rather than a term Trump is quoted offering 7. He told reporters negotiations resume at the start of the week, naming neither the venue nor the parties 8.

Tehran has matched none of that in public. Iran's security chief was promising attacks until "total surrender" days before the cancellation , and Bahraini and Kuwaiti aircraft had already flown their own runs at Iranian depots earlier in July with Emirati intelligence behind them . The Gulf states now credited with stopping an American strike are not bystanders to the war they asked Washington to slow down.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Donald Trump is the US President. He said he was ready to bomb Iran on Sunday 2 August, then called it off hours later. He did not change his mind on his own. Three Gulf countries, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, asked him to stop, worried that Iran would hit their oil and gas facilities in response and drive up costs for everyone. Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman made the case to Trump personally. Nothing was signed to make the halt official, so it could be reversed as quickly as it was agreed.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Qatar hosts Al Udeid Air Base, the forward headquarters CENTCOM has run this air campaign from, and Bahrain hosts the US Fifth Fleet; both arrangements rest on renewable basing agreements rather than a permanent legal guarantee, which gives the host government a practical veto that a home-territory ally could never exercise.

Saudi Arabia carries no equivalent basing leverage since Riyadh removed US combat aircraft from its soil after 2003, so Mohammed bin Salman's intervention worked through the economic argument alone, oil and gas exposure, rather than through infrastructure Washington depends on operationally.

Escalation

De-escalatory in the near term but reversible within hours, since nothing prevents the halted strike from being rescheduled once Gulf mediation ends.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Gulf capitals have shown they can move a specific American strike date; broader US Iran policy remains Washington's alone to set.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    Because the halt rests on verbal assurances, a single Iranian strike on a Gulf target could collapse the arrangement without warning.

    Short term · Reported
  • Precedent

    This is at least the second time in the war a Gulf-brokered call has stopped a scheduled US strike, following the 18 May cancellation (ID:3431).

    Medium term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #165 · Gulf capitals talk Trump out of a strike

Al Jazeera· 3 Aug 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
China's Ministry of Commerce
China's Ministry of Commerce
Spokesperson He Yadong said on 16 July that Beijing and the Netherlands should let firms settle the Nexperia dispute through consultation, after a Dutch ministerial visit to Beijing. The conciliatory tone contrasts with the confrontational US trade response to the same fortnight's DMA enforcement.
Samsung Electronics
Samsung Electronics
Samsung entered talks reported 22 July to invest up to €1 billion in Mistral AI, part of a round valuing the French lab at roughly €20 billion alongside EQT, Novo Holdings and Santander. The Korean conglomerate, not an EU financing instrument, is positioned to anchor Europe's flagship AI lab.
Poland (Tusk government)
Poland (Tusk government)
Donald Tusk's government proposed a mandatory sovereignty test on 21 July for state technology contracts above 5 million zloty, scoring bids on AI model-weight rights and vendor lock-in rather than waiting for an EU-wide procurement rule. The threshold targets a 20-30 per cent domestic-alternative share.
United States administration
United States administration
Donald Trump ordered a Section 301 investigation into EU digital-enforcement practices on 24 July, a day after USTR's Jamieson Greer said the Google fine created massive uncertainty for US exports, noting Google's cumulative EU fines already exceed 2 per cent of the bloc's budget.
Ecosia
Ecosia
Ecosia said the 16 July FRAND ranking-data order would take it from answering two-thirds of queries to all of them once the obligation activates in January 2027. The Berlin-based challenger has not called the enforcement package adequate, only workable if Google complies rather than appeals.
European Commission
European Commission
Teresa Ribera and Henna Virkkunen announced the €890m fine on 23 July, saying products should succeed on merit, not platform ownership; four days earlier a separate Article 6(7) order compelled Android interoperability. The Commission expects both to hold on appeal after the Court of Justice upheld its earlier €4.1bn Android fine on 2 July.