
Institute for the Study of War
Washington think tank publishing daily open-source battlefield assessments on Ukraine and Iran conflicts since 2007.
Citing Russian military bloggers, the Institute for the Study of War assessed on 12 September that Ukrainian troops had erased Russia's salient north of Lyman, while stressing the absence of Independent confirmation.
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026 · Appears in 3 active topics
How many consecutive net-loss weeks has ISW now documented for Russia, and does the front hold?
Timeline for Institute for the Study of War
Mentioned in: DeepState triples count of Russian gains
Russia-Ukraine War 2026ISW assesses Ukraine eliminated the Lyman salient
Russia-Ukraine War 2026assessed the likely mobilisation form
Russia-Ukraine War 2026: Ivashchenko says generals asked Putin for 800,000 troopsMentioned in: An IRGC adviser claims enemy-soil orders
Iran Conflict 2026Mentioned in: Trump calls off the Sunday strike
Iran Conflict 2026Background
The Institute for the Study of War is a Washington think tank that publishes open-source assessments of the Russia-Ukraine and Iran conflicts. Its relevance lies in turning claims, battlefield reports and available visual evidence into dated assessments that readers can test against its stated caveats.
Founded in 2007, the Institute is best known for daily battlefield analysis and control maps. On 7 June, it confirmed Russia's use of North Korean rocket launchers mounted on Russian robotic ground vehicles near Kharkiv.
Its work also covers the Iran conflict. On 20 July, it assessed an Iranian statement thanking the Jordanian people as a cover narrative linked to reported strikes in Jordan. The Institute matters because it distinguishes verified evidence, reported claims and unresolved uncertainty across fast-moving wars.
Its assessments test Russian claims
In its 12 September assessment, the Institute for the Study of War judged that Ukraine had erased Russia's position north of Lyman. It cited Russian military bloggers conceding the ground, but said no Independent primary source had confirmed the result.
That caution is central to the Institute's role. On 18 July, it found no evidence that Russian troops had entered five settlements listed by General Staff chief Valery Gerasimov. The finding recorded an absence of corroboration, rather than claiming a geolocated refutation.
It tracks Russia's recruitment strain
On 10 September, the Institute assessed that Russia was more likely to use rolling call-ups than a single mass mobilisation. The judgement followed a reported request for 800,000 additional troops, which Ukraine's military intelligence said could not be met in one intake.
The assessment places recruitment within a wider measure of battlefield pressure. On 23 June, the Institute described eastern Ukraine's front as barely shifted and found neither side able to secure a decisive breakthrough. Its work therefore links force generation to a war measured in sustained attrition and limited territorial movement.