Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Institute for the Study of War
OrganisationUS

Institute for the Study of War

Washington think tank publishing daily open-source battlefield assessments on Ukraine and Iran conflicts since 2007.

Last refreshed: 13 July 2026 · Appears in 3 active topics

Key Question

How many consecutive net-loss weeks has ISW now documented for Russia, and does the front hold?

Timeline for Institute for the Study of War

#2311 Jul

Recorded Russian and Ukrainian tactical advances on 11 July

Russia-Ukraine War 2026: Overnight barrage shifts no front line
#2311 Jul
#2123 Jun
#2123 Jun
View full timeline →
Common Questions
What is the Institute for the Study of War?
ISW is a Washington, D.c.-based non-partisan defence research organisation founded in 2007 by Kimberly Kagan. It publishes daily battlefield assessments of the Russia-Ukraine war used by Western governments and military staffs.Source: ISW
Did ISW confirm Russia’s spring 2026 offensive?
Yes. In March 2026 ISW assessed that Russia’s spring-summer offensive was under way, corroborating Ukrainian General Staff data showing 619 ground attacks over four days from 17 to 20 March, with 163 directed at the Pokrovsk axis alone.Source: ISW / Syrskyi briefing
What did ISW find about Russian territorial gains in early 2026?
ISW data, compiled with the Harvard Belfer Center, showed Russia’s advance rate had decelerated fivefold between mid-2025 and February 2026, from 130-150 sq km per week to 33-50 sq km per week. Russia recorded its first sustained net territorial loss since 2023 in the period 17 February to 17 March 2026.Source: ISW / Harvard Belfer Center

Background

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a non-partisan defence research organisation founded in 2007 by military historian Kimberly Kagan, headquartered in Washington, D.c. It produces daily battlefield assessments, interactive control maps, and order-of-battle analysis, publishing its Russia-Ukraine and Iran coverage jointly with the Critical Threats Project at the American Enterprise Institute. Its assessments directly shape Western government, military staff, and journalist coverage of active conflicts, and its numbers are cited in parliamentary and congressional debates on military aid authorisations. Critics, including some Western commentators, characterise ISW's institutional stance as hawkish, though its battlefield data remains a primary independent reference for Western governments.

ISW has been the primary external arbiter of Russian battlefield claims throughout 2026. On 21 April 2026 it directly contradicted Russia's Chief of General Staff Gerasimov, verifying roughly 340 km² of Russian 2026 territorial gains against his claimed 1,700 km², establishing a documented 5:1 exaggeration ratio. Through May 2026, ISW logged Russia net-losing 12 square miles (5-12 May) then 29 square miles (12-19 May) in consecutive net-loss weeks. In the week to 3 June 2026, ISW recorded a net Russian loss of 14 square miles and on 7 June confirmed no Russian advances anywhere on the front line, with Russian milbloggers voicing discontent. ISW also reported on 7 June the first integration of North Korean Type-75 MLRS on Russian UGVs in the Kharkiv direction, the first combat fusion of DPRK rocket artillery onto an autonomous platform. In 2026 ISW has also been cited in CENTCOM briefing contexts relating to the Iran conflict.

On 11 July 2026, ISW recorded Russian advances in the Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka tactical area alongside Ukrainian advances in the Novopavlivka direction, the same overnight period in which Russia fired a mixed barrage of Iskander-M and S-400 Ballistic Missiles, Cruise Missiles, anti-radar missiles and drones. Neither advance was enough to redraw the map, holding ISW's assessed front largely to its grinding baseline even as the war's centre of gravity moved to Russia's fuel economy.

More questions
How does ISW differ from the Harvard Belfer Center on Ukraine analysis?
ISW produces the underlying daily battlefield data: event logs, control maps, and order-of-battle. The Harvard Belfer Center's Russia Matters project synthesises ISW's raw data into longer-run trend analysis. The two organisations collaborated directly on the February-March 2026 territorial assessment.Source: ISW / Harvard Belfer Center
Is ISW reliable for Ukraine war reporting?
ISW is widely cited by Western governments, military staffs, and major news outlets as a primary source for battlefield analysis. Russia disputes its findings, calling it a Western-funded propaganda outlet. ISW’s assessments are corroborated by Ukrainian General Staff data and, in the 2026 territorial study, by the Harvard Belfer Center.Source: ISW
What did ISW find about Russian territorial losses in May 2026?
ISW assessed that Russia net-lost 12 square miles in the week of 5-12 May and 29 square miles in the week of 12-19 May 2026, marking the second and third consecutive net-loss weeks. Combined with April data, this is the most sustained reversal documented since 2023.Source: ISW / Russia Matters
Who founded the Institute for the Study of War?
ISW was founded in 2007 by Kimberly Kagan, a military historian and Foreign Policy analyst. It is based in Washington, D.c., and has become the primary external reference for tracking the Russia-Ukraine war.Source: ISW
Why does ISW contradict Russia's claims about territorial gains?
ISW independently verifies battlefield reports using satellite imagery and open-source intelligence. In April 2026, ISW verified roughly 340 sq km of Russian gains against Gerasimov's claimed 1,700 sq km, establishing a 5:1 exaggeration ratio in Russian reporting.Source: ISW
How accurate are ISW's Russia-Ukraine war maps?
In April 2026, ISW verified ~340 km² of Russian gains against Gerasimov's claimed 1,700 km², documenting a 5:1 exaggeration ratio in Russian battlefield claims. ISW's assessments are treated as the external ground-truth reference by Western governments.Source: ISW
Is Russia gaining or losing territory in 2026?
ISW has logged four consecutive weeks of Russian net territorial losses through 3 June 2026, including 29 square miles in the week of 12-19 May and 14 square miles in the week to 3 June. On 7 June, ISW confirmed no Russian advances anywhere on the front.Source: ISW
Did ISW report North Korean weapons in Ukraine in 2026?
On 7 June 2026, ISW reported the first sighting of North Korean Type-75 107mm MLRS mounted on Russian unmanned ground vehicles in the Kharkiv direction, the first confirmed combat integration of DPRK rocket artillery on an autonomous platform.Source: ISW
Does ISW work with any partner organisations?
Yes. ISW jointly publishes its Russia-Ukraine and Iran battlefield assessments with the Critical Threats Project, a research programme at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington.
Is the Institute for the Study of War politically biased?
ISW describes itself as non-partisan, though some Western commentators characterise its institutional stance as hawkish. Its raw battlefield data is nonetheless treated as a primary independent reference by Western governments and militaries.
Is the front line still moving in the Russia-Ukraine war in July 2026?
Barely. ISW recorded Russian advances at Kostyantynivka-Druzhkivka and Ukrainian advances at Novopavlivka on 11 July 2026, but neither was enough to redraw the map; the ground war has held a grinding baseline while Russia's fuel economy became the main battleground.Source: ISW
Source Material