
Institute for the Study of War
Washington think tank publishing daily open-source battlefield assessments on Ukraine and Iran conflicts since 2007.
A Washington think tank publishing daily open-source battlefield assessments on Ukraine and Iran since 2007, whose control maps and casualty cross-checks are cited by Western governments, military staff and journalists across both wars.
Last refreshed: 3 August 2026 · Appears in 3 active topics
How many consecutive net-loss weeks has ISW now documented for Russia, and does the front hold?
Timeline for Institute for the Study of War
Mentioned in: An IRGC adviser claims enemy-soil orders
Iran Conflict 2026Mentioned in: Trump calls off the Sunday strike
Iran Conflict 2026Relayed an unconfirmed Russian-source claim of an explosion at Chayko's birthday party
Russia-Ukraine War 2026: ISW relays an unconfirmed Moscow blastPublished July's monthly campaign assessment
Russia-Ukraine War 2026: Russia fired most, gained least in JulyMentioned in: Missile fell in Poland, Warsaw ready
Russia-Ukraine War 2026Background
Founded in 2007 by military historian Kimberly Kagan, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) is a non-partisan Washington think tank producing daily battlefield assessments, interactive control maps and order-of-battle analysis on the Russia-Ukraine and Iran conflicts. It publishes jointly with the Critical Threats Project at the American Enterprise Institute, including a daily Iran Update alongside its Ukraine coverage.
Its core method is cross-checking official claims, Russian, Iranian, American or otherwise, against geolocated footage and open-source reporting, which is why its assessments routinely contradict the government whose claims it is checking: it has found no evidence behind Russian battlefield claims, read Iranian diplomatic gestures as cover narratives, and relayed unconfirmed Russian-source reports without endorsing them.
Some Western commentators characterise its institutional stance as hawkish, and Russian state media dismisses it as a Western propaganda outlet. Its figures nonetheless feature regularly in parliamentary and congressional debates on military aid and in Western government assessments of both wars.