26JUL

The sanctions that need no signature

3 min read

10:21UTC

The US Treasury has kept sanctioning Iran throughout the war under a pre-war memorandum, freezing nearly half a billion dollars while Trump has signed no new order of his own.

← Back to The €890m fine that cost more than it collects Jump to analysis ↓

TechnologyDeveloping

Key takeaway

US sanctions on Iran keep firing on pre-war authority; only sanctions relief needs a new signature.

The US Treasury has run a named, continuous sanctions campaign against Iran throughout the war, even as the White House has signed no new Iran measure. Treasury calls the campaign Economic Fury, and it operates under National Security Presidential Memorandum 2 (NSPM-2), a pre-war order that delegates designation power to the department rather than requiring a fresh presidential signature ¹.

On 27 May the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Treasury's sanctions arm, designated Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority for extorting Hormuz shipping tolls; on 10 June it blacklisted nine China and Hong Kong entities for arming the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) ². Treasury says the campaign has frozen "nearly half a billion" dollars and disrupted "tens of billions" in regime-linked revenue ³. A direct query of the Federal Register returned zero new Iran filings between 29 June and 2 July ⁴.

The gap between an empty signing record and live enforcement has a mechanism. NSPM-2 delegates designation authority to OFAC through executive orders that predate the conflict, so Treasury can keep naming targets while any genuinely new instrument stalls. The one Iran action that did need a fresh signature, General Licence X, loosened sanctions rather than tightening them, and its missing escrow and reporting caps handed Chinese buyers a 60-day safe harbour . Relief requires a pen; pressure does not.

Donald Trump's public words and Washington's actions point in opposite directions. On 30 June he demanded cheap petrol on Truth Social and signed nothing ; on 1 July he called the denuclearisation of Iran "moving along well" ⁵. His earlier order for a Justice Department oil-gouging probe sits in the same column: enforcement motion that does not require settling the war.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The US Treasury has been sanctioning parts of Iran's economy continuously since before the war even started, under a standing campaign called Economic Fury. It does not need the president to sign anything new each time: officials can add names to the sanctions list on autopilot. In the past six weeks alone, Treasury sanctioned the Iranian body that tries to collect tolls from ships in the Strait of Hormuz, and nine companies in China and Hong Kong accused of helping arm the IRGC, Iran's most powerful military force. Even though no new sanctions appeared in the official US government record for four straight days, that gap does not mean enforcement stopped.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Economic Fury runs on National Security Presidential Memorandum 2, a delegation of designation authority to Treasury that predates the war and requires no fresh presidential signature to continue. That is structurally different from General License X, the one Iran sanctions instrument that did need Scott Bessent's active signature to authorise oil sales and dollar payments .

The zero-filing gap between 29 June and 2 July does not mean enforcement paused: OFAC's designation pipeline runs independently of both the Doha talks and the Federal Register's publication cycle, so a quiet week in the public record does not mean a quiet week inside Treasury.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Continued designations during the funeral pause keep economic pressure on Iran even while every diplomatic channel is closed.
Risk
If Tehran reads ongoing designations as evidence Washington is not serious about a deal, it hands hardliners in the Assembly of Experts and IRGC ammunition against the negotiators.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources from United States

United States

LeftRight

Primary parallel: Sanctions relief under the 2015 JCPOA needed the opposite mechanism to Economic Fury: the US president had to actively sign a waiver roughly every four months to keep sanctions suspended, until Donald Trump declined to renew that waiver in May 2018, triggering an automatic snapback.

Counter-parallel: The Cuban embargo, imposed under the Trading with the Enemy Act in 1962, has run on delegated authority regardless of who has occupied The White House since, surviving even the Obama-era normalisation attempt, evidence that once sanctions run on standing authority they rarely reverse without a deliberate presidential act.

Immediate impact: Economic Fury has frozen close to $500 million in Iranian assets and disrupted tens of billions of dollars in revenue, according to Treasury, concentrated in cryptocurrency exchanges, shadow-banking networks and now the Persian Gulf Strait Authority itself, the body Iran created to collect Hormuz tolls.

Structural effect: designating the toll authority under counterterrorism rather than trade-sanctions statute means any government or shipping line paying an Iranian Hormuz fee risks its own dollar transactions, a legal deterrent that outlasts any single round of Doha talks.

Consensus view: The Foundation for Defense of Democracies assesses that delegated authority under National Security Presidential Memorandum 2 lets Treasury keep degrading Iran's Hormuz-toll and IRGC-procurement networks without needing a new signature, preserving leverage regardless of how the Doha talks proceed, as shown by the 27 May Persian Gulf Strait Authority and 10 June China and Hong Kong designations.

Counter-view: Bourse & Bazaar Media, which tracks Iran's economy closely, argues designations continuing on pre-war executive authority while zero new Iran filings appeared in the Federal Register between 29 June and 2 July shows Washington's enforcement machinery has become disconnected from its own diplomacy, an autopilot that can undercut negotiators' credibility if Tehran reads it as bad faith mid-talks.

Key tension: Whether delegated sanctions authority preserves US leverage, or undermines trust in the parallel diplomatic track by running independently of it.

First Reported In

Update #143 · Diplomacy pauses for a funeral under threat

US Department of the Treasury· 2 Jul 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

FDD: oil licence has no enforcement

General License X is the one Iran sanctions exception needing a fresh signature, unlike Economic Fury.

Occurred 23 Jun 2026

Read story →

Trump orders a DOJ oil-gouging probe

Trump's DOJ oil-gouging probe sits alongside Economic Fury as motion not requiring settling the war.

Occurred 24 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

The sanctions that need no signature

The pressure that actually costs Iran money runs on delegated authority, so it continues no matter what Doha produces.

Led to

Japan reopens Iran oil talks after 2019

Treasury's use of pre-war delegated sanctions authority is the same waiver framework Japanese buyers are now testing.

Occurred 3 Jul 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

China's Ministry of Commerce

Spokesperson He Yadong said on 16 July that Beijing and the Netherlands should let firms settle the Nexperia dispute through consultation, after a Dutch ministerial visit to Beijing. The conciliatory tone contrasts with the confrontational US trade response to the same fortnight's DMA enforcement.

Samsung Electronics

Samsung entered talks reported 22 July to invest up to €1 billion in Mistral AI, part of a round valuing the French lab at roughly €20 billion alongside EQT, Novo Holdings and Santander. The Korean conglomerate, not an EU financing instrument, is positioned to anchor Europe's flagship AI lab.

Poland (Tusk government)

Donald Tusk's government proposed a mandatory sovereignty test on 21 July for state technology contracts above 5 million zloty, scoring bids on AI model-weight rights and vendor lock-in rather than waiting for an EU-wide procurement rule. The threshold targets a 20-30 per cent domestic-alternative share.

United States administration

Donald Trump ordered a Section 301 investigation into EU digital-enforcement practices on 24 July, a day after USTR's Jamieson Greer said the Google fine created massive uncertainty for US exports, noting Google's cumulative EU fines already exceed 2 per cent of the bloc's budget.

Ecosia

Ecosia said the 16 July FRAND ranking-data order would take it from answering two-thirds of queries to all of them once the obligation activates in January 2027. The Berlin-based challenger has not called the enforcement package adequate, only workable if Google complies rather than appeals.

European Commission

Teresa Ribera and Henna Virkkunen announced the €890m fine on 23 July, saying products should succeed on merit, not platform ownership; four days earlier a separate Article 6(7) order compelled Android interoperability. The Commission expects both to hold on appeal after the Court of Justice upheld its earlier €4.1bn Android fine on 2 July.