Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Department of Justice
OrganisationUS

Department of Justice

US federal law enforcement agency; voter-data programme at appellate test after 6 district court dismissals.

By 23 July 2026 the Justice Department had lost all seventeen of its state voter-roll lawsuits and won none, after a court dismissed its Kentucky case; the Sixth Circuit had already affirmed the first appellate loss on 24 June.

Last refreshed: 4 August 2026 · Appears in 7 active topics

Key Question

After six dismissals, can DOJ's voter-data programme survive its first appellate test at the 9th Circuit?

Timeline for Department of Justice

#14 22 Jul

Sued 30 states and Washington DC over voter files and lost 17 rulings

US Midterms 2026: DOJ loses again on state voter files
#14 19 Jul

Reached the UOCAVA compliance agreement with South Carolina

US Midterms 2026: The deadline that beat the vacancy
View full timeline →

Background

The Department of Justice, founded in 1870, is the principal US federal law enforcement and legal agency. It prosecutes federal crimes, defends the United States in court, and enforces civil rights, antitrust and immigration law under an Attorney General who serves at the President's direction; roughly 115,000 staff work across its divisions and US Attorney offices. Pam Bondi has led the department through Trump's second term.

Since April 2026 the department has been the central enforcement actor in a national voter-registration drive, invoking the Civil Rights Act of 1960 to demand complete voter rolls from every state, with the data confirmed in court to flow to the Department of Homeland Security for citizenship screening under the SAVE system . The department's own privacy officer resigned rather than implement the plan, and Democracy Forward is pursuing a separate FOIA suit over the underlying data-sharing arrangement with CISA .

The department also disbanded its KleptoCapture task force, which had targeted sanctioned Russian oligarchs' assets, on 5 February 2026 under Bondi, and its OFAC bureau used the Protecting American Intellectual Property Act for the first time in a cyber case that April, sanctioning Russian exploit broker Sergey Zelenyuk's Operation Zero network .

Key Issues
Antitrust enforcement

DOJ cleared a merger unconditionally

The Department of Justice cleared Paramount Skydance's $110bn takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery unconditionally on 12 June 2026, placing no conditions on the deal's roughly 49.5% Gulf-linked foreign ownership . Other regulators went further: the FCC opened its own review of the foreign-ownership stake, and twelve Democratic-led states sued on 13 July to block the deal outright, arguing it would raise prices and cut content.

A California judge granted a temporary restraining order on 20 July, finding evidence of a theatrical-market antitrust violation sufficient to halt the merger's closing, a stricter finding than the DOJ's own clearance reached . Brussels cleared the deal on 22 July, but only after Paramount agreed to sell its Universal distribution stake and forgo European Universal deals for ten years, terms tougher than Washington's unconditional pass.

Cuba prosecution

DOJ indicted Raul Castro without extradition

The Justice Department unsealed a grand jury indictment on 20 May 2026 accusing Raul Castro, then 94, of conspiracy and four murder counts over the 1996 downing of two Brothers to the Rescue aircraft . The grand jury had acted a month earlier, on 23 April, but Castro faces no extradition route and no trial date.

Havana's foreign ministry called the charge 'political coercion' through the state outlet Cubadebate, while Russia and China sent Castro birthday messages on his 95th birthday on 3 June, two weeks after the indictment, a gesture of solidarity that came with no material support . President Miguel Diaz-Canel continues to offer talks 'on equal terms' while keeping jailed critics off the table.

Common Questions
What is the 9th Circuit DOJ voter data appeal about?
Oregon appealed the DOJ's voter-data lawsuit to the 9th Circuit. Oral argument is set for 19 May 2026. The outcome will set circuit-level precedent on standing and could determine whether the five district-court dismissals hold.Source: event
What is Common Cause's lawsuit against the DOJ voter database?
Common Cause filed a federal suit on 21 April 2026 challenging the entire DOJ national voter-database architecture, rather than individual state cases. It argues the whole system is unlawful regardless of which state is targeted.Source: event
What is DOJ's legal basis for demanding voter rolls from states?
DOJ invoked the National Voter Registration Act, arguing it confers authority to demand complete voter rolls for citizenship verification via the DHS SAVE System. Courts have rejected this as insufficient standing without a demonstrated disenfranchisement injury.Source: Lowdown
What is the DOJ's role in the Voting Rights Act?
The DOJ's Civil Rights Division is the primary federal enforcer of the Voting Rights Act and the National Voter Registration Act, including prosecuting discriminatory voting practices and, historically, preclearance review before Shelby County (2013).
How many states are still fighting the DOJ voter-data demands?
The Justice Department has sued 30 states and the District of Columbia, 31 cases in all. As of 23 July 2026, seventeen had been dismissed, one settled in Oklahoma and thirteen remained live.Source: University of Wisconsin State Democracy tracker, 16 June 2026
What is the status of the DOJ voter-data appeals in 2026?
The 9th Circuit heard the Oregon appeal on 19 May 2026 and the 6th Circuit heard Michigan on 13 May 2026; neither has ruled. Roughly 22 states and DC remain in active litigation.Source: University of Wisconsin State Democracy tracker, 16 June 2026
Has the DOJ appealed all its voter-data dismissals?
Yes. By 16 June 2026 the DOJ had appealed all eight district court dismissals it had lost, in California, Oregon, Michigan, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Maine.Source: University of Wisconsin State Democracy tracker, 16 June 2026
What happens if the 9th Circuit rules against DOJ in the voter-data case?
A 9th Circuit affirmance would consolidate dismissals across nine western states and create persuasive authority in other circuits. Combined with the six existing dismissals, it would leave DOJ's programme with no viable judicial pathway without a SCOTUS intervention.Source: Lowdown
When is the 9th Circuit hearing the DOJ voter-data appeal?
The 9th Circuit scheduled oral argument for 19 May 2026, in an Oregon case that will be the first appellate-level ruling on the DOJ voter-database programme.Source: Court docket
Who filed the broader challenge to DOJ's national voter database in 2026?
Common Cause filed a federal challenge on 21 April 2026 contesting the entire national voter-database architecture, operating on a separate track from the state-by-state NVRA dismissals.Source: Lowdown
Why have courts dismissed the DOJ voter-data lawsuits?
Five federal district courts dismissed the suits on the same standing grounds: the DOJ cannot demonstrate a concrete legal injury that gives it jurisdiction to demand voter rolls under the NVRA when its purpose is citizenship screening rather than voter registration compliance.Source: Federal court rulings
How many courts have dismissed the DOJ voter-data lawsuits?
Five federal district courts dismissed DOJ voter-data suits by April 2026, all using the portable standing reasoning established by the Massachusetts federal court in April 2026. A 9th Circuit appeal is scheduled for 19 May 2026.Source: event
Did the DOJ privacy officer really resign over voter data sharing?
Yes. The DOJ privacy officer resigned on approximately 3 April 2026 rather than implement the voter data-sharing plan between DOJ and DHS under the SAVE citizenship screening system.Source: event
Why is the DOJ suing states over voter registration data?
The DOJ demanded complete voter rolls from all 48 states under a Trump executive order. When 29 states refused, the DOJ sued them. A DOJ official confirmed in court that the data would be shared with DHS for citizenship screening via the SAVE System.Source: event
Which states refused to give voter data to the DOJ?
29 states and DC refused the DOJ's demand for complete voter registration lists and were subsequently sued. 17 mostly Republican-led states complied.Source: event
What happened to the DOJ's KleptoCapture task force?
Attorney General Pam Bondi disbanded Task Force KleptoCapture on 5 February 2026, ending the unit's work seizing Russian oligarch assets and prosecuting sanctions evasion since 2022.Source: DOJ announcement
Source Material