Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
US Midterms 2026
24SEP

Arlington sues over armed men at polls

3 min read
11:45UTC

Arlington County's board sued DHS, ICE, DOJ and the FBI on 20 October under an 1865 law that bars troops or armed men at the place of an election. It wants armed federal staff kept from every voting site in the county.

PoliticsAssessed
Key takeaway

Arlington County is using an 1865 law to keep armed federal agents from its polls.

The County Board of Arlington County sued the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement), the Department of Justice, the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) and their heads on 20 October⁠1. Filed in the federal court for eastern Virginia, the complaint argues that federal "Polling Place Policies" breach Section 592 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 USC 592), a federal criminal statute. That 1865 law, passed in the last months of the Civil War, bars "troops or armed men" at the place of an election unless needed "to repel the armed enemies of the United States". Judge Leonie Brinkema has the case⁠2.

The county cites remarks by DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin on 1 September, which it reads as confirming that DHS policy lets armed ICE officers go to polling places for civil immigration enforcement. That means action over a person's immigration status, handled outside the criminal courts. It also cites FBI Director Kash Patel at a Senate Judiciary hearing, where he spoke under oath. Asked, "Wait, I thought you weren't going to be sending people to the polls?", he replied, "When did you hear that? It's just another lie."⁠3 The county reads that as a claim of authority to send armed agents.

Arlington wants armed federal staff kept from its polling sites, early-voting sites, drop boxes and curbside voting. Virginians have been voting in person since 18 September. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) sued the Trump administration over ICE at polling places in September. Arlington's is the first such suit by a local government that Lowdown has found.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Arlington is a county in Northern Virginia, across the river from Washington. It runs its own polling places. It has asked a federal judge to stop armed federal officers, including immigration agents, from going to its voting sites. It points to a law from 1865, passed at the end of the Civil War, that bans troops or armed men at elections. The federal government has not yet answered in court. The head of Homeland Security has said agents would go to polling places only to deal with a threat or make an arrest.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Virginians have been voting in person since 18 September, so any armed presence would affect weeks of voting, not a single day. The county asks for protection at early-voting sites, drop boxes and curbside voting as well as polling places.

The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) and other groups sued over ICE at polling places in September. Arlington adds a different kind of plaintiff: the body that runs the polling sites.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Brinkema's first order will show whether the case can be decided before 3 November.

  • Precedent

    A ruling that section 592 covers federal agents would give every county a basis to keep armed officers away from voting sites.

First Reported In

Update #21 · Senate GOP's cash lead trails its $20m loan

US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia· 22 Oct 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
University of Florida Election Lab
University of Florida Election Lab
The lab, run by Michael McDonald, estimates about 124.3 million ballots, a raw midterm record, and turnout of about 49.4% of eligible voters, second to 2018's 50.05%. The raw record reflects population growth more than a record rate, so the late count is working through a near-2018 electorate.
Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson
Thune's critics on the right, including Senator Ron Johnson
Ron Johnson backed the failed 31-15 motion to delay Thune's re-election, after activists such as Mike Cernovich blamed the leader for the defeat. Their complaint is that Republicans could have passed the SAVE Act; in January it meets a Democratic Senate instead.
Senator John Thune
Senator John Thune
Thune was re-elected Senate Republican leader by acclamation on 10 November after a motion to delay failed 31-15. He kept the filibuster that stopped the SAVE Act, the choice his critics on the right blame for the defeat.
House Republicans under Jim Jordan
House Republicans under Jim Jordan
House Republicans elected Jordan minority leader by 106 votes to 73 over Steve Scalise on 10 November, after Speaker Mike Johnson declined to run. They replaced the leadership that lost the majority, while Senate Republicans kept theirs.
Donald Trump
Donald Trump
Trump asked on Truth Social on 9 November whether anybody believed the election "was honest" and blamed the machines, having told The New York Times on polling night he would accept the results. No Republican campaign had sued over a 2026 result by 10 November, so the claim has no case behind it.
Judge David O. Carter
Judge David O. Carter
Carter closed the Justice Department's suit over about 20,000 California mail ballots on 10 November after the department withdrew it, writing that the suit "attempted to disrupt an ongoing election". The closure leaves the department with no court order touching a 2026 California ballot.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.