1JUN

Meloni breaks European line to the Gulf

4 min read

10:39UTC

Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni became the first EU, NATO or G20 leader in the Gulf since the war began. An unnamed supplier has already cut 10 Italian LNG cargoes; European fiscal responses are diverging.

← Back to Oreshnik doubles as Russia's front collapses Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictDeveloping

Key takeaway

Italy's unilateral Gulf trip and 10 lost LNG cargoes confirm physical supply disruption is now ahead of any EU coordination.

Giorgia Meloni travelled to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates on 3 to 4 April, the first leader of any European Union, NATO or G20 member state to visit the Gulf since the war began on 28 February ¹. The trip was unannounced before departure. An unnamed Gulf supplier subsequently notified Rome that 10 LNG (liquefied natural gas) cargoes scheduled between April and mid-June would not be delivered, the first publicly disclosed physical supply cut to a European buyer. Italian airports began rationing jet fuel on 7 April.

Domestic responses across the continent are diverging rather than coordinating. Italy cut excise duty on petrol and diesel by 25 cents per litre for 20 days. Germany finalised a €1.6 billion package on 13 April: a 17-cent excise reduction for two months and a tax-free €1,000 employer bonus ². France rejected a comprehensive fuel-tax cut and allocated €70 million to the road transport sector only. Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Austria have jointly proposed an EU-level windfall tax on energy companies; the European Commission has begun alerting Ireland, Poland and Estonia to expected oil and gas shortages. The blockade-day Brent surge has already pushed pass-through costs onto European forecourts.

The United Kingdom's 40-nation reopening coalition was assembled on the premise that a coordinated European demand-side approach would give diplomatic weight to negotiations on Hormuz. Meloni's Gulf trip dismantles that assumption from the supply side. It is procurement emergency dressed as foreign policy: Italy is lining up Azerbaijan follow-up visits, has deployed aerial defences to the Gulf to protect remaining supply, and has stopped waiting for a collective EU decision.

The practical consequence for the rest of the bloc is fiscal. The divergence between Italy's 25-cent cut, Germany's 17-cent cut, France's transport-sector allocation and the Spain-Portugal-Austria windfall-tax route means the EU cannot present a coordinated energy position in the negotiations the UK coalition was trying to build. Each member state is buying its own political cover at its own cost, and the single market's ability to pool the pain has collapsed before any ministerial meeting has been scheduled.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Italy's prime minister flew secretly to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates, the first leader of any European or NATO country to visit the Gulf since this war began. She went because Italy is running short of gas and jet fuel, not because of a coordinated European strategy. An unnamed Gulf supplier told Rome it would not deliver 10 ship-loads of liquefied gas that Italy was expecting between now and mid-June. Italian airports are already rationing jet fuel. The government cut fuel tax to help drivers at the pump. Other European countries are doing different things. Germany spent €1.6 billion on a different type of relief package. France gave a much smaller amount only to the road haulage industry. Spain, Portugal and Austria want a new Europe-wide tax on energy companies. The problem with all these different national responses is that Europe loses negotiating leverage when each country is making its own deals. Italy's separate trip to the Gulf shows that the EU cannot act as one voice when supply is being physically cut off.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Diverging national fiscal responses reduce the EU's credibility as a unified actor in any Hormuz diplomatic negotiation, since Gulf suppliers can play member states against each other.
Risk
Italy's unilateral bilateral track undermines the UK's 40-nation reopening coalition by creating a competing European channel that Gulf suppliers may prefer to engage with individually.

Source Landscape

This story draws on mixed-leaning sources from United Arab Emirates and United States

United Arab Emirates

United States

Primary parallel: The 1973 Arab oil embargo exposed exactly the same European coordination failure. Germany and France struck separate oil supply deals with Saudi Arabia and Iraq within weeks of the embargo's start, while the official EEC position was still being formulated.

The lesson drawn from 1973 produced the International Energy Agency and EU-level strategic reserve obligations. Fifty years later, those instruments address stockpile management but not the bilateral supply diplomacy that Italy is now conducting.

Counter-parallel: The 2022 European response to the Russian gas cut-off produced a degree of demand solidarity that the 1973 precedent had not. EU member states coordinated the 15% demand reduction target and shared LNG import capacity. That 2022 cohesion is not replicated here, because the physical supply cut is arriving faster and the diplomatic divergence (Italy breaking to the Gulf unilaterally) has appeared before the EU has even scheduled a ministerial meeting.

Italy's 10-cargo LNG suspension between April and mid-June represents the first confirmed physical cut to a European buyer, but the financial exposure extends further. Italian airports began fuel rationing on 7 April; the aviation sector's jet-fuel exposure is not covered by the 25-cent retail excise cut. Italy's energy import mix is more exposed to Gulf LNG than Germany's, which has partially diversified to US LNG terminals since the 2022 Russian cut-off.

The five-country windfall-tax proposal from Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Austria faces a structural EU governance obstacle: windfall taxes require unanimity under Article 192 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU when they affect a member state's right to determine energy mix.

Ireland, Poland and Estonia, the three countries the European Commission has already alerted to expected shortages, have different exposure profiles and different fiscal positions on energy taxation, making unanimity unlikely without side payments.

Consensus view: Bruegel Institute analysts Rosa Bora and Georg Zachmann assess that the divergence in national fiscal responses (Italy's 25-cent excise cut, Germany's €1.6 billion relief package, France's transport-only €70 million) reflects a structural EU energy-governance failure: member states facing immediate domestic political pressure act unilaterally because the EU's collective energy policy instruments were designed for price shocks, not simultaneous physical supply cuts and diplomatic emergencies.

Counter-view: European Council on Foreign Relations researchers in Rome and Berlin argue that Meloni's Gulf trip is less a breakdown of European solidarity than a return to the pre-Ukraine pattern of differentiated European bilateralism, which always operated alongside formal EU positions.

Italy maintained separate energy supply agreements with Libya and Algeria throughout the 2009-2014 EU Southern Gas Corridor process. The divergence is a feature of European energy diplomacy, not a new failure mode.

Key tension: Whether the divergence in national fiscal responses will prevent the EU from presenting a collective energy position in any Hormuz diplomatic track, or whether differentiated bilateralism can coexist with an eventual EU-level coordination mechanism.

First Reported In

Update #68 · Sanctioned tankers slip the blockade

The National· 14 Apr 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Oil surges past $103 on blockade

Brent's 8% blockade-day surge past $103 (ID:2286) is the direct driver of European fiscal emergency responses and Italy's Gulf energy diplomacy documented in this event.

Occurred 13 Apr 2026

Read story →

UK leads 40-nation rival coalition against blockade

Italy's unilateral Gulf trip creates a competing European bilateral track to the UK's 40-nation reopening coalition (ID:2289), which had previously been the only European diplomatic route in motion.

Occurred 13 Apr 2026

Read story →

This Event

Meloni breaks European line to the Gulf

Italy's unilateral Gulf trip and the cargo cut confirm the European coalition is not holding under physical supply pressure.

Different Perspectives

China

Beijing has not publicly commented on the dual Oreshnik launch. China's declared position of urging restraint and dialogue sits awkwardly alongside its continued economic ties with Russia; the weapons escalation tests whether Beijing's neutrality framing can survive a European IRBM normalisation event.

IAEA

Director General Grossi condemned the ZNPP reactor-6 turbine building strike and stated "there should be no attack of any kind from or against the plant." The agency confirmed normal radiation levels but has not resolved attribution; Rosatom CEO Likachev warned the region is "one step closer to an incident."

Turkey

Ankara hosted Istanbul Round 2 at Ciragan Palace on 2 June and secured a 1,200-for-1,200 prisoner exchange, consolidating Turkey as the war's sole diplomatic venue after Rubio confirmed US mediation has ended. Erdogan's leverage over both parties grows with each round.

European Union

EU Ambassador Mathernova answered Lavrov's evacuation demand with "We stay in Kyiv. We stay with Ukraine." The Verkhovna Rada approved the EUR 90bn EU loan on 28 May; the EUR 9.1bn first tranche, the EU's first explicit defence-procurement financing, arrives mid-June.

United States

Rubio declared US mediation stagnated on 22 May and confirmed no talks were occurring, then received Lavrov's evacuation demand three days later without ordering embassy drawdown. Washington's leverage now runs through the GL 134C sanctions cliff on 17 June rather than any active diplomatic channel.

Ukraine

Zelenskyy called Russia's 2-3 day ceasefire counter-offer at Istanbul Round 2 "shortsighted" and submitted a full peace memorandum covering EU membership, international guarantees, phased sanctions relief and frozen-asset reparations. Kyiv's position is that a partial ceasefire freeze aids Russian reconstitution; only an all-domain 30-day pause is acceptable.