15JUL

Fourth night of strikes hits Abadan

2 min read

13:29UTC

CENTCOM ran a fourth consecutive night of strikes into 14 July, hitting Bandar Abbas, the Abadan refinery and Gulf islands, as Trump said Iran "shot first".

← Back to US enforces Hormuz closure with blockade Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictAssessed

Key takeaway

The fourth strike night moved the campaign onto Iran's refineries and strait islands, beyond military targets.

CENTCOM ran a fourth consecutive night of strikes into 14 July, hitting Bandar Abbas and Sirik on the mainland coast, the Abadan refinery, and Mahshahr, Qeshm Island and Kish Island ¹. Donald Trump framed the campaign as reprisal, saying "they shot first ... we have been knocking the hell out of them" ².

The target list tells the story. Abadan, commissioned in 1912 and the oldest refinery in the Middle East, and Mahshahr are refining and petrochemical hubs, while Qeshm and Kish sit astride the strait's approaches. Washington is now striking the infrastructure that makes Iranian oil sellable and the islands from which the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) polices transit, well beyond the military sites of earlier waves.

This is the third strike wave inside a week, after roughly 140 targets on 12 July and about 90 on 8 July . The cadence has hardened from punitive raids into a sustained bombardment of Iran's coastal energy belt, which is what converts a blockade order into an enforced one.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Four nights of strikes on a naval base city, a century-old refinery and three Gulf islands is not one raid but a sustained campaign to make it harder for Iran to threaten the strait again, which is why it lands on the same day as the renewed blockade.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

The strike run follows the same enforcement logic as the Hormuz blockade: having reinstated the naval closure, CENTCOM is degrading the port city, refinery and strait-adjacent islands that give Iran the means to contest it at source.

A second driver is domestic messaging: Trump's own framing, that Iran shot first, ties the strike campaign to the tanker and drone escalation record built since early July, giving each new strike a retaliatory justification regardless of scale.

What could happen next?

Risk
Hitting refining capacity at Abadan, rather than purely military targets, risks disrupting domestic Iranian fuel supply in a way that could sharpen Tehran's incentive to escalate against Gulf shipping rather than absorb the loss quietly.

Source Landscape

This story draws on centre-left-leaning sources from Qatar

Qatar

Primary parallel: Abadan refinery was besieged and repeatedly shelled during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War, when Iraqi forces cut the city off for over a year; the refinery survived that war only to come under fire again now, in a conflict fought by air rather than siege.

Counter-parallel: Qeshm and Kish are administered partly as free-trade and tourism zones alongside their military functions, letting Iranian state media frame strikes on them as hitting civilian economic infrastructure, the same framing Tehran used over the disputed Bushehr and Asaluyeh claims days earlier.

Consensus view: Western defence commentary, echoed in IISS regional assessments, has read the repeated strikes on Bandar Abbas and the strait's islands as degrading Iran's capacity to re-mine or re-close Hormuz rather than pursuing regime change, consistent with the minelayer-focused strikes CENTCOM ran in late June.

Counter-view: Iranian and allied Gulf commentary reads a fourth consecutive night of strikes, hitting a century-old refinery alongside military sites, as escalation that outruns any narrowly military justification for protecting shipping lanes.

Key tension: Whether striking a refinery of Abadan's scale is proportionate to shipping attacks, or amounts to economic-infrastructure targeting that invites its own retaliatory logic.

Sources:Al Jazeera

Mentions:CENTCOM (US Central Command) →Bandar Abbas →Donald Trump →Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) →IISS →Iran →Iran-Iraq War →Asaluyeh →Iraq →Tehran →Sirik →Qeshm Island →Washington →Abadan →Mahshahr Petrochemical Complex →Kharg Island →

First Reported In

Update #154 · US enforces Hormuz closure with blockade

Al Jazeera· 15 Jul 2026

Read original →

Different Perspectives

Oil market and P&I insurers

Brent cleared $87 intraday only once CENTCOM's blockade became physical rather than declared, even though P&I Clubs had already excluded Hormuz war risk a week earlier on 7 July: capital hedged ahead of enforcement, but prices moved only after it.

UAE reporting

UAE reporting placed the Omani tanker deaths at one seafarer against the International Maritime Agency's count of two, the first time in this war that a Gulf state's casualty figures have diverged from an international monitor's.

Jordan

Iranian strikes reached Jordan again on 14 July as part of the Gulf-wide retaliation for the Hormuz blockade, extending the conflict's geographic footprint to a state with no direct stake in the strait itself.

Bahrain

Bahrain sounded air-raid sirens on 14 July during Iran's Gulf-wide retaliation, the same day CENTCOM's blockade order and fourth night of strikes pushed the conflict's physical reach into the wider Gulf littoral.

Kuwait

Kuwait intercepted Iranian missiles and drones on 14 July as Tehran's blockade retaliation reached Gulf states beyond Iran's immediate shoreline, confirming Kuwaiti airspace now sits inside Iran's retaliatory envelope.

Oman

Oman absorbed the war's first tanker casualties in its own waters on 14 July, with two supertankers disabled and seafarers killed, putting the sultanate's shipping lanes directly in the path of the blockade fight for the first time.