Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
14JUN

F/A-18 disables tankers via smokestack on 8 May

4 min read
11:42UTC

A US Navy F/A-18 from USS George H.W. Bush put 500-pound laser-guided warheads down the chimneys of M/T Sea Star III and M/T Sevda on 8 May. CENTCOM's blockade redirection count climbed to 57.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

An aerial doctrine that disables tankers without sinking them, the same weekend Trump called it 'a love tap'.

An F/A-18 Super Hornet launched from the USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) disabled two Iranian-flagged tankers, M/T Sea Star III and M/T Sevda, on 8 May by firing precision munitions through their smokestacks 1. US Central Command (CENTCOM), the Pentagon command responsible for the Strait of Hormuz blockade, confirmed both vessels were attempting to reach Iranian ports in violation of standing redirection orders. The ordnance, likely 500-pound laser-guided warheads, was dropped down the chimney rather than into hull or magazine, disabling the propulsion and electrics without rupturing the cargo or killing the crew.

This was the third blockade enforcement action in a fortnight and the first to use aerial precision-disabling rather than naval gun fire. CENTCOM's commercial-vessel redirection count has now climbed from 48 on 3 May to 52 on 7 May to 57 on 8 May, five fresh redirections in two days. Four Iranian-flagged vessels have been physically disabled across the campaign so far 2. The technique maps onto a long-standing US Navy preference for proportional kinetic response: the 1988 Praying Mantis engagements aimed to neutralise Iranian platforms without sinking civilian shipping in the same waters. The 2026 variant uses laser-guided ordnance for what 1988 did with five-inch gun fire.

The Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, the IRGC overarching joint operational command, claimed "significant damage" to US destroyers from the 7-8 May missile, drone and small-boat salvos near Bandar Abbas . CENTCOM confirmed zero hull damage and zero US casualties 3. Tasnim, the IRGC-linked agency, cited an unnamed senior source claiming three US destroyers fled to the Gulf of Oman. Both accounts cannot be true; both are real official statements in an information war running behind the kinetic one.

Donald Trump described the same exchange to ABC News as "just a love tap" on the same weekend his pilots were dropping laser-guided ordnance down two tanker chimneys. The verbal de-escalation track and the kinetic enforcement track are no longer running on the same calendar. The new precision-disabling doctrine creates an evidentiary record (vessel still afloat, intact cargo, surviving crew) that enables prosecution under the Hormuz blockade legal architecture, where sinking would have foreclosed it. CENTCOM has not yet published the rules of engagement under which an aircraft may put precision munitions into a non-combatant tanker.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

A US Navy jet from the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush flew over two Iranian oil tankers on 8 May and dropped precision bombs through their smokestacks, the metal exhaust chimneys on top of the ships. This disabled both ships' engines and electricity without blowing holes in the hull or igniting the cargo. This was not a random attack. The US has been enforcing a naval blockade, turning back ships trying to deliver oil to Iran. These two tankers were attempting to bypass the blockade to reach Iranian ports. The method of disabling through the smokestack, rather than firing at the hull, was chosen specifically to incapacitate the vessel without sinking it or killing the crew, so the ships can be towed away and the action defended as proportionate under international law. Despite this, President Trump described the same strikes to ABC News as 'just a love tap', while the actual bombs used weighed 500 pounds. The gap between his public description and what his military actually did illustrates how differently the verbal and military tracks of this war are being run.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The US Navy's preference for disabling rather than sinking reflects a structural constraint specific to the Strait of Hormuz geography.

The strait is 33 km wide at its narrowest navigable point; a sunk VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier) at the choke would produce a navigational obstruction with a draught exceeding 20 metres, potentially closing the channel entirely for weeks. **CENTCOM** planners are operating with an implicit constraint that the blockade must remain selectively permeable: enough enforcement to coerce, not enough structural damage to make the strait itself unnavigable. Disabling-not-sinking preserves the option space.

The F/A-18 strike on M/T Sea Star III and M/T Sevda on 8 May is the third enforcement action and the first aerial one, driven by the absence of a surface-boarding alternative that could safely approach vessels in an active IRGC-fire environment. The switch to aerial precision was not a doctrinal preference but a tactical necessity produced by the IRGC's small-boat swarm tactics near Bandar Abbas.

What could happen next?
  • Precedent

    The smokestack precision-disabling technique, applied without published RoE, sets a doctrinal precedent other naval powers may cite to justify similar disabling strikes on third-party shipping in contested chokepoints.

    Medium term · 0.8
  • Risk

    Without published RoE, an aircraft crew error or escalation in a future engagement has no established legal boundary; the first fatality on a disabled tanker would collapse the proportionality defence CENTCOM is currently relying on.

    Short term · 0.82
  • Consequence

    The 57-vessel CENTCOM redirection count creates an evidentiary record that will be presented to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea once Iran or a flag state files; each disabled vessel is a discrete legal case.

    Long term · 0.7
First Reported In

Update #92 · An MOU asking Iran to surrender what nobody can count

Arms Control Association· 9 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Underwriters can price Houthi strikes because the group announces its targets, but an unclaimed drone at Damietta and a mandatory Iranian insurance scheme both deny them a pattern to price against. War-risk premiums are increasingly being set by the absence of a claimant, not the scale of the damage.
Jordan
Jordan
Azraq absorbed its fourth Iranian strike in seven weeks, again drawing no direct Jordanian retaliation, only an American one. Amman's exposure, hosting US basing without the Patriot density of Gulf allies, has not changed even as the war around it widens.
Houthi movement
Houthi movement
The Houthis' 20 July blockade of Saudi-linked shipping is the injury Riyadh's new 43-nation coalition directly answers, yet the group itself was never asked to join and remains outside every proposal on the table. Sanaa-aligned commentators call the coalition a paper reassurance for insurers rather than a deployable force.
Egypt's Cabinet
Egypt's Cabinet
Egypt confirmed the Damietta blaze was an attack, not an accident, on soil the war had never touched before. Cairo now faces an unclaimed threat to a facility supplying roughly 7% of its domestic gas, with no author to hold accountable and no pattern yet to defend against.
Oman
Oman
Muscat is running the only channel Iran will use, a voluntary Hormuz fee modelled on Malacca, but stayed out of Saudi Arabia's new naval coalition entirely. Oman's mediating leverage depends on treating Hormuz as shared and non-exclusive, the opposite of what Tehran is now demanding of it.
Iraq's Prime Minister
Iraq's Prime Minister
Al-Zaidi cancelled his first official Riyadh visit and convened the Coordination Framework, the coalition that keeps him in power and whose factions sit inside the PMF that Saudi jets just struck. He is caught between a five-year Saudi investment relationship and armed groups inside his own state he does not fully control.