Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
12JUN

Aramco warns of a 17.5% shock

4 min read
09:18UTC

Brent crude settled at $104.21 on Monday, up $2.92 on Trump's verbal alone. Saudi Aramco chief executive Amin Nasser said the market is losing roughly 100 million barrels of supply each week, with prolonged disruption pushing any normalisation into 2027.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent at $104 prices Trump's words; Aramco's 100 million barrels per week implies a 17.5% unpriced shock.

Brent Crude settled at $104.21 on Monday 11 May, up $2.92 (2.9%) on $101.29 the previous session 1. The move broke the $101 floor that had held through Friday's bulk-carrier strike near Doha, the Mokhber doctrine declaration and the IRGC firing-order threat . Nothing signed underwrote the spike: it came on Donald Trump's Oval Office verbal statement, with no executive order, deployment directive or CENTCOM operational order behind it. Brent traded above $94 on Tuesday morning, holding most of Monday's gain.

Saudi Aramco chief executive Amin Nasser said the same day that the market is losing roughly 100 million barrels of supply each week and that prolonged disruption could push any normalisation into 2027 2. That weekly loss roughly equals Saudi Arabia's full weekly output. Translated into a daily run rate against the notional 80 million barrels per day global crude base, Nasser's number implies a 17.5% supply shock against a curve that has not priced it.

Brent at $104.21 prices the market's probability-weighted average of paper outcomes, not Nasser's physical-market reading; priced literally, Nasser's number justifies materially higher Brent. The ceiling holds while Wall Street still expects a deal; it breaks upward if Trump signs a bombing order on his Friday return, or downward if he signs a written counter-text. For UK consumers the lag template is already running: the $4.54 per US gallon pump benchmark hit on 8 May is the precedent forecourts will follow within a fortnight, putting roughly £1.78 per litre on UK pumps before the Beijing trip closes.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The price of oil went up sharply on 11 May after Trump's tough statements about Iran. It reached $104.21 per barrel, breaking through a floor of about $101 that had held for several days. The CEO of Saudi Aramco; the world's largest oil company; said the world is losing around 100 million barrels of oil supply every week because of the Hormuz disruption. He warned it could be 2027 before the situation returns to normal. For ordinary people, this means petrol and diesel prices could rise further over the coming weeks if the situation does not improve. Oil prices that stay above $100 for an extended period push up the cost of transport, heating, and most goods that need to be shipped.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The Strait of Hormuz carries approximately 21 million barrels of oil per day in normal conditions; roughly a quarter of global seaborne crude. Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority has imposed a toll and registration requirement that most Western-flagged carriers have not complied with, effectively reducing transit to a fraction of pre-war volumes.

Saudi Aramco's export routes do not depend on Hormuz for the majority of its exports via the East-West pipeline to Yanbu on the Red Sea, but Aramco ships roughly 7 million barrels per day that do transit the strait; giving Nasser's 'market is losing supply' framing a direct commercial basis, not merely geopolitical observation.

The oil market's difficulty pricing the disruption reflects genuine uncertainty about whether a deal materialises this week or in three months: two scenarios produce $75 and $120 Brent respectively, so the $104 settlement is arithmetically the probability-weighted midpoint.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Sustained Brent above $100 triggers fuel surcharge reviews at major freight carriers. US, UK, and EU logistics cost indices will absorb the move within 30 days.

    Short term · 0.85
  • Risk

    A 2027 normalisation scenario; if Nasser's guidance is treated as credible; would prompt hull and cargo insurers to reprice annual premiums at Q3 2026 renewal cycles, adding $15-25 per barrel in effective delivered cost for Asian buyers.

    Medium term · 0.6
  • Opportunity

    The $101 floor breaking higher gives US negotiators a price signal they can present to Iran: a deal that reopens Hormuz produces immediate Brent compression to $85-90, saving Tehran from the inflationary oil-price feedback on its own import costs.

    Short term · 0.65
First Reported In

Update #95 · OFAC opens the Hong Kong door

CNBC· 12 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Brent fell to $89.25 on ceasefire probability, not new barrels, with traders voting for Trump's deed over Tehran's denial. Lloyd's has not repriced Hormuz war-risk cover because its trigger requires a UN Security Council resolution or government certification, so tanker insurance costs remain elevated regardless of the spot move.
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan's Mohsin Naqvi was in Tehran for his second visit in under a week, using the Pakistan-Qatar channel that delivered April's ceasefire after an identical public-denial cycle. The channel carries both civilian and military buy-in from Islamabad, the only configuration Iran's split command cannot dismiss as a partial signal.
India
India
India summoned the US Deputy Chief of Mission after three Indian sailors were killed aboard MT Settebello, the first formal grievance from a major non-belligerent directed at US enforcement. Indian seafarers supply roughly 12 per cent of the global maritime workforce; their presence on third-flag Gulf tankers is structurally inevitable regardless of bilateral diplomacy.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC declared Hormuz closed on 11 June while civilian negotiators were on the same mediation channel, then issued no public comment on the MoU framework. Its silence on the framework, rather than any foreign ministry statement, is the operative approval signal; the corps' unilateral Hormuz closure shows it did not treat the diplomatic track as binding on its operations.
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Esmail Baghaei told IRNA that reports of a finalised deal were 'merely speculation' and that Iran had 'not yet made a final decision'. The denial is structurally identical to Iranian foreign ministry statements during the April ceasefire talks, which produced a binding text within 48 hours of the same language.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump cancelled the third strike day and called the MoU 'very strong' and almost ready to sign, while CENTCOM kept tanker enforcement running in the same 24-hour window. The administration is simultaneously withdrawing the military pressure it claims drove the deal and sustaining the enforcement campaign it is trying to trade away.