Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Tech Sovereignty
3JUN

Iran's deal waits on a leader unseen since March

3 min read
10:43UTC

The MoU awaits a decision from Mojtaba Khamenei, unseen in public since early March; analysts at the Stimson and Soufan centres assess IRGC commanders now hold day-to-day authority over the war.

TechnologyAssessed
Key takeaway

With the supreme leader unseen since March, the corps that shut Hormuz now decides whether any deal survives.

Mojtaba Khamenei has not appeared in public since early March, more than three months after being named Iran's supreme leader and wounded in the 28 February strike that killed his father. He has governed since through written statements relayed by state media. Pakistan's interior minister Mohsin Naqvi carried dual civilian and military letters to him in Tehran on 6-7 June ; more than three months on, no public response has come, and the MOU reportedly still waits on his word.

Thomas Juneau of the Stimson Center and analysts at The Soufan Center assess that IRGC commanders now hold day-to-day authority over the war, exceeding the supreme leader's. The Naqvi channel, on that reading, routes letters to a figure who may no longer be the decision node, while the corps acts on its own initiative. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, the civilian negotiator, has been overruled by the corps before.

The Hormuz closure supplies the proof. A military command that can shut the strait the same week its government's mediators are pressing for a deal is the command that decides whether any deal holds, whatever the absent leader eventually signs. The question is no longer whether Tehran wants an agreement; it is whether the part of Tehran that wants one can deliver the part that is fighting.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, is the country's most powerful official on paper, with constitutional authority above the president and parliament. He was appointed in March 2026 after his father was killed in a February air strike. He was wounded in the same attack and has not appeared in public since early March. Pakistan is trying to help broker a peace deal and has sent a senior official to deliver letters from both Pakistani civilian and military leaders to Khamenei. But there has been no public response. Analysts watching Iran closely believe the military commanders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) are actually making the day-to-day war decisions, not Khamenei. That creates a big problem for any peace negotiation: the person the deal needs to sign off may not be the one with authority to make it stick.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Mojtaba Khamenei was appointed supreme leader on 7 March in an emergency online session of the Assembly of Experts after the Qom headquarters was destroyed. At least eight members boycotted, citing IRGC pressure and Mojtaba's lack of the marja theological credentials required by Article 109 of Iran's constitution.

The constitutional legitimacy deficit combined with physical injury means his authority over the corps rests on IRGC political endorsement rather than constitutional mandate, inverting the normal relationship between the supreme leader and the military.

The parallel command problem is amplified by the Naqvi channel's structure. Pakistan's mediation routes through civilian interlocutors (Foreign Minister Araghchi) as well as military ones (Field Marshal Asim Munir's equivalent letters).

But the 11 June Hormuz closure shows the IRGC acting independently of both channels on the same week the civilian mediators were pressing for a deal. The two-track structure, civilian plus military mediation, does not resolve to a single authoritative answer if the corps command overrides whatever the civilians agree to.

Escalation

Stable but structurally dangerous. The IRGC holding day-to-day authority without a functioning supreme-leader endorsement mechanism means there is no single escalation decision node that a mediator can reach. Any deal needs corps buy-in that no external mediator currently has direct access to.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If Khamenei's incapacity is permanent or worsens, a formal succession process under Article 111 of Iran's constitution must convene the Assembly of Experts. With the Qom headquarters destroyed and the assembly's authority contested, a second wartime succession would create a deeper legitimacy crisis inside Iran.

    Medium term · Assessed
  • Consequence

    The Pakistan mediation channel, structured around delivering letters to Khamenei, addresses a figurehead while the IRGC military council makes operational decisions. Unless Pakistan or another mediator gains direct access to IRGC commanders, the channel cannot produce a binding ceasefire commitment.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Meaning

    The IRGC closing Hormuz on 11 June, the same week Pakistan pressed for a deal through Khamenei, demonstrates that the corps treats the civilian diplomatic track as parallel to, rather than binding on, its military decisions.

    Immediate · Reported
First Reported In

Update #124 · IRGC declares Hormuz shut; US strikes again

Geo.tv / Stimson Center / Soufan Center· 11 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
European cloud and open-source industry
European cloud and open-source industry
European cloud providers gain a binding procurement mandate from CADA, confirmed by Gartner's $12.6bn sovereign-cloud figure for 2026. The $40bn Pax Silica commitment signals Brussels will not extend sovereignty discipline to the silicon layer, and the missing €350m Sovereign Tech Fund leaves open-source maintenance infrastructure unfunded beneath those same clouds.
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Science Secretary Kendall's £1.1bn Hardware Plan on 8 June chose demand-side instruments, advancing £150m to British chip startups via the British Business Bank, where Brussels chose supply-side alliance membership. Britain joined Pax Silica before the EU and has no collective EU procurement leverage; the Hardware Plan is the bilateral answer to the same silicon gap.
United States
United States
Pax Silica, a State Department initiative launched in December 2025, secured EU membership the same afternoon Brussels adopted its cloud sovereignty law. Ambassador Puzder had named CADA a red line against the EU-US trade framework; the narrowed CADA scope and the $40bn chip commitment together represent the settlement Washington sought.
France
France
France was the only EU state to oppose Pax Silica accession at COREPER on 3 June, asking the Commission to clarify the Council's steering role inside the alliance. Paris backed CADA and hosts Mistral AI; a $40bn US-chip commitment contractually narrows the commercial space for the sovereign AI model that France is trying to scale.
European Commission
European Commission
Von der Leyen framed CADA on 3 June as keeping 'most of our market open to like-minded partners', and the Commission's EVP Virkkunen simultaneously required majority-European ownership for the €4.12bn AI Gigafactories call. Brussels is managing rather than resolving the silicon dependency by asserting regulatory control at the cloud layer while formalising the chip relationship through Pax Silica.
European Central Bank
European Central Bank
The ECB's digital euro pilot drew more than 50 PSP applications and is naming 10 to 30 participants in July, advancing on its own monetary mandate without requiring a Commission act. Its trajectory this week is the inverse of CAIDA's: the sovereignty instrument that restricts no US firm is the only one keeping its published calendar.