Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
European Oil Markets
23JUL

Netanyahu sidelined by the deal on Iran

3 min read
19:27UTC

The Washington Post called the memorandum an informal referendum on Netanyahu's tenure; he was excluded from the diplomacy that ended the war and his cabinet now repudiates its terms.

← Back to Second chokepoint doubles Med freightJump to analysis ↓
EconomicDeveloping
Key takeaway

Netanyahu faces an autumn election on a deal he was excluded from negotiating.

For Benjamin Netanyahu, the deal reads at home as a verdict on him. The Washington Post called the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding "an informal referendum on Netanyahu's tenure" ahead of Israeli elections this autumn 1; a PBS analyst called it a "strategic defeat" for Israel; Haaretz called it Netanyahu's "second worst fiasco" after 7 October 2. Critics say he led Trump into the war while overpromising the result, then misjudged the President's appetite for a long fight.

Netanyahu was sidelined from the diplomacy that ended it. The mediation ran through Qatar, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, none of it through Jerusalem . His own cabinet has repudiated the terms he was not consulted on: National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir says "Trump's agreement does not bind us", and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich rejected the memorandum from the Knesset floor.

At a press conference Netanyahu insisted "as long as I am Prime Minister, Iran will not get nuclear weapons". That is a promise about the exact question the memorandum he was excluded from has deferred for 60 days. A leader who staked his standing on stopping Iran's bomb now faces an autumn election on a deal he did not write, cannot bind and which postpones the one outcome he built his career on guaranteeing.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Israeli newspapers and media commentators are treating the Islamabad deal as a personal verdict on Benjamin Netanyahu, separate from foreign policy as a whole. He pushed the US into military action against Iran, promised it would end the nuclear threat, and found he had no seat at the table when the deal was made. Qatar, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey ran the mediation; Netanyahu did not attend any round. The deal defers the nuclear question for 60 days, which was the exact question Netanyahu said military action would answer. His coalition partners Ben-Gvir and Smotrich have said publicly the deal does not bind Israel. Netanyahu at a press conference promised Iran would never get nuclear weapons on his watch, but the 60-day talks, from which he was excluded, now control that question.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Netanyahu's exclusion from the Islamabad process has a structural cause separate from any personal failing. The mediation ran through Qatar, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey because all four maintain active diplomatic channels with Tehran. Israel and Iran have been in active military confrontation since February 2026; no mediation requiring Iranian consent can include the party Iran is fighting as a co-mediator.

The political crisis at home follows from a promise Netanyahu could not keep: that the US military campaign, which Israel helped design, would produce verifiable Iranian nuclear disarmament. The Islamabad MOU defers that question for 60 days, which his coalition partners, Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, have read as a failure of the campaign's explicit goal.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If Israel's autumn election produces a coalition including Ben-Gvir and Smotrich in stronger roles, Israeli repudiation of the MOU's Lebanon terms becomes government policy rather than ministerial dissent.

  • Consequence

    Netanyahu's exclusion from the Islamabad process has permanently altered the US-Israel alliance dynamic: Washington negotiated a Middle East settlement that its closest regional partner repudiated on the day of signing.

Sources:Haaretz·Al Jazeera
Mentions:Sinai →Islamabad →Menachem Begin →Iran →Lebanon →Pakistan →Yom Kippur War →Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding →Egypt →Washington →TrumpIRA.gov →Benjamin Netanyahu →Washington Post →Haaretz →PBS NewsHour →Itamar Ben-Gvir →Qatar →Saudi Arabia →Turkey →Israel →Knesset →Bezalel Smotrich →
First Reported In

Update #130 · Trump signed the war over; it kept going

Haaretz· 17 Jun 2026
Read original →
Causes and effects
Caused by
Israel rejects a deal it never signed
The 15 June cabinet rejections by Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir, Smotrich and Gantz escalated into broader Israeli and international commentary framing the MOU as a referendum on Netanyahu's tenure.
Occurred 15 Jun 2026
Read story →
Iran deal signed, no register entry
The Vance-Ghalibaf signing excluded Israel's government, which is the direct cause of Israeli commentary framing the deal as a referendum on Netanyahu's leadership.
Occurred 15 Jun 2026
Read story →
This Event
Netanyahu sidelined by the deal on Iran
Netanyahu promised at a press conference exactly what the deal he was shut out of has deferred for 60 days.
Different Perspectives
US money managers (CFTC-tracked)
US money managers (CFTC-tracked)
US money managers had trimmed WTI net long positioning into July's rally, doubting the Hormuz premium would hold without freight or war-risk confirmation, and the crude stock build reported for the week to 17 July gives that scepticism a fundamentals basis. The 25 July CFTC data will show whether Brent's move above $100 changed their calculus.
Asian distillate buyers (Singapore)
Asian distillate buyers (Singapore)
Singapore's distillate holders kept retaining middle-distillate barrels as the East-West arbitrage window narrowed further this week, a pattern that sharpened as Fujairah light distillates hit a record low. Cargoes are being held rather than released west into the tightening Mediterranean market.
Bulgaria
Bulgaria
Bulgaria secured the removal of Lukoil founder Vagit Alekperov and Patriarch Kirill from the 21st package, with President Rumen Radev calling a personal listing 'shooting ourselves in the foot'. Sofia is protecting its position in Lukoil's EUR 3bn compensation claim over the 2023 Neftohim Burgas nationalisation.
Russia
Russia
Russia loses the roughly $14 a barrel of legal headroom the price-cap formula would have released toward $58, even as Urals continues trading below Moscow's $59 budget floor. The shadow-fleet insurance workaround that lets sanctioned crude clear above $44 in practice remains untouched by the freeze itself.
European Union
European Union
The EU adopted its 21st sanctions package on 23 July, freezing the $44 Russia oil cap for 12 months rather than letting the formula drift it toward $58, and listed shadow-fleet support vessels for the first time. The package cleared only after three failed Coreper votes.
Marine war-risk underwriters (Lloyd's-linked syndicates)
Marine war-risk underwriters (Lloyd's-linked syndicates)
War-risk syndicates lifted southern Red Sea hull premiums 150% to about 0.75% of hull value after the 20 July blockade declaration, still a seventh of the roughly 5% Hormuz band. Underwriters reset on realised loss, not declared threat, so the 23 July Encelia and Layla strikes set up the next re-mark.