Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Cuba Dispatch
12JUN

Treasury carves Cuba out of Venezuela oil easing

3 min read
09:35UTC

A broad US authorisation on 18 March let Venezuelan crude flow to global markets again, but named Cuba alongside Russia and Iran in the exclusions.

PoliticsDeveloping
Key takeaway

Washington eased Venezuela sanctions for the world and tightened them against Havana in the same stroke.

On 18 March 2026 the US Treasury issued a broad authorisation permitting PDVSA (Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A., the Venezuelan state oil firm) to sell crude on world markets, including to US refiners, in response to Iran-war supply pressure 1. The licence carried an explicit carve-out: transactions involving Cuba, Russia, Iran, North Korea and certain Chinese entities remain prohibited.

The practical effect is a two-tier settlement of Venezuela policy. Most of the world regains access to PDVSA crude at a moment when Hormuz disruption has pushed refiners to scramble for non-Iranian supply. The Cuban state, historically PDVSA's single most politically-loaded customer, does not. Cuba is grouped with strategic adversaries rather than with ordinary sanctions targets, which is a structural categorisation rather than a tactical one.

The instruments involved are the Cuban Assets Control Regulations (CACR), the statutory framework Treasury administers through its Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), and the 1996 LIBERTAD Act underpinning them. GAESA (Grupo de Administración Empresarial S.A., the Cuban military's economic conglomerate) is the specific state actor blocked from buying. Payments under the general licence route to a US-controlled account with gold and cryptocurrency settlement prohibited, closing the workaround channels Havana has used in previous tight-fuel episodes. The carve-out is the policy decision around which the remainder of the Cuba dispatch is organised.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The US eased oil sanctions on Venezuela so most of the world could buy Venezuelan crude again. But it explicitly banned Cuba from that deal. Think of it as the US reopening a petrol station to everyone except one customer. Cuba used to depend on Venezuela for cheap oil to keep its power stations running. That supply is now cut off at the source. The lights that go out each evening in Havana are partly a direct consequence of this decision.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

GAESA's dominance of Cuban oil imports means any Venezuela-Cuba fuel channel routes through the Cuban military conglomerate. US sanctions logic since 2019 has targeted GAESA specifically, making it structurally impossible to allow Cuban state oil imports without benefiting the entity the sanctions most intend to pressure.

The timing reflects Iran war supply politics: the March 18 authorisation was driven by Hormuz disruption pushing US refiners to seek alternative supply. Cuba's exclusion was the political cost of selling the Venezuela easing to the Miami Republican delegation and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hardliners.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Cuba's state thermal fleet is deprived of its most commercially-accessible emergency fuel source, extending the grid crisis beyond what Russian tanker cadence alone can offset.

    Short term · 0.85
  • Risk

    If Russia cannot sustain tanker deliveries at fortnightly intervals, Cuba faces rolling grid collapse rather than managed brownouts; with hospital and water-treatment consequences quantified by the UN.

    Medium term · 0.72
  • Precedent

    Grouping Cuba with Russia, Iran and North Korea in a statutory exclusion sets a categorisation that will be difficult to walk back without a formal sanctions redesignation.

    Long term · 0.8
First Reported In

Update #1 · Cuba carve-out survives Venezuela oil easing

Military.com· 15 Apr 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
WOLA (Washington Office on Latin America)
WOLA (Washington Office on Latin America)
WOLA argues that sanctioning peso-paid Cuban officials has limited coercive bite because their personal holdings are not US-proximate, citing the Maduro Venezuela precedent: the head-of-state listing functions as a signal rather than a seizure, and the real operational weight of the 4 June package sits entirely in FAQ 1258's ownership-tree multiplier.
OCDH / Prisoners Defenders
OCDH / Prisoners Defenders
OCDH (Observatorio Cubano de Derechos Humanos, Madrid-based) documented 332 repressive actions in May and formally demanded an EU reparations fund for Cuban political prisoners. Prisoners Defenders' May census placed the count at a record 1,281 with one death in custody; both organisations argue the EU restrictive-measures track is the remaining lever after the US programme has exhausted institutional designations.
EU / Netherlands Foreign Affairs (Ollongren track)
EU / Netherlands Foreign Affairs (Ollongren track)
EU Special Representative Kajsa Ollongren received the OCDH Acuerdo de Liberacion in Brussels on 13 May demanding asset freezes and a victims' compensation fund for political prisoners. Madrid's hotel-sector stake and the Spanish chains' own exit decisions create a structural tension within EU policy between restrictive-measures pressure and commercial-engagement continuity.
China
China
China joined Russia in birthday solidarity to Raul Castro but has not moved a tanker to Cuba since the CUPET designation. Beijing's calculus resembles the post-PDVSA Venezuela calculation: barter or renminbi-denominated crude outside the US legal perimeter is technically available but requires absorbing secondary-sanctions risk Washington is deliberately signalling.
Russia
Russia
Moscow sent birthday solidarity to the indicted Raul Castro on 3 June but despatched no replacement cargo after the Sovcomflot Universal turned back on 26 May. Russia's practical support for Cuba is constrained by its own war economy and secondary-sanctions exposure under the same OFAC architecture it benefits from in the Ukraine context.
Cuban government / MINREX
Cuban government / MINREX
Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla condemned the CUPET designation as 'further tightening the economic and energy blockade'; Diaz-Canel's standing public line is willingness for dialogue 'on equal terms' but political prisoners are explicitly off the table. Havana offers no new concessions after the personal listing.