Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
Autonomous Systems: Land & Sea
3AUG

Belgium's twelve robots come with cables

3 min read
10:02UTC

Belgium's defence ministry tendered on 29 July for twelve underwater vehicles steered down a tether by a human operator, for its divers, bomb-disposal service, mine warfare group and special forces.

TechnologyDeveloping
Key takeaway

Belgium's bomb-disposal teams chose a cable over autonomy, and bought twelve at once.

The Belgian Ministry of Defence issued tender 525183-2026 on 29 July, seeking twelve Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicles for its Engineer Divers, the EOD (explosive ordnance disposal) service, the Naval Mine Warfare Group and the Special Forces Group, together with accessories, spare parts, specialist tools, documentation and training⁠1. The notice appeared on Tenders Electronic Daily (TED), the European Union's official public procurement journal. Lowdown queried the notice at source. No value appears in it, and none has been reported anywhere.

Read the vehicle type carefully, because it carries the point. A UW ROV runs down a physical tether to a human operator sitting on a boat, who watches its cameras and decides what its manipulator arm touches. That is a different machine from an AUV (autonomous underwater vehicle), which swims a planned mission alone and reports back afterwards. Belgium specified the opposite of autonomy, deliberately.

The reason lies in the work itself. Divers and bomb-disposal teams handle live ordnance, where an error has one consequence and no recovery. A cable gives them three things at once: a data link that jamming cannot cut, a person in the loop at the exact moment the vehicle touches something explosive, and a physical line to drag the machine home when a thruster fails on the seabed. Autonomy buys endurance and area coverage. A tether buys certainty, and around a mine the buyer pays for certainty above all.

That cuts against the direction this beat has been travelling. The allied autonomous mine countermeasures package reached Middle East theatre aboard RFA Lyme Bay in June, and Britain confirmed £90m for three Norwegian-built motherships to carry that kind of kit in July. Both point the same way, towards machines that swim alone. The order actually placed in this ten-day window, by a NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) member, is for the sort you drive, twelve of them at once. A specification written for tethered vehicles also narrows the bidder pool sharply towards established ROV builders and largely shuts out the AUV specialists. The subsea autonomy market is not one market maturing at one speed; it splits by consequence of error, and disposal work sits on the side that keeps the wire.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

An ROV is a Remotely Operated Vehicle: an underwater robot connected to its operator by a cable, so a person on the surface drives it and sees through its cameras in real time. That differs from an AUV, which drives itself with no cable and no live human steering. Belgium's defence ministry wants twelve of these ROVs for its combat divers, its bomb-disposal service, its naval mine-clearance unit and its special forces, plus spare parts, tools and training. No price tag has been published yet, which is normal at this stage of a European tender.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

A cable-tethered ROV cannot be jammed the way a wireless link to an autonomous vehicle can, which matters directly when the vehicle is carrying or approaching live ordnance for the Explosive Ordnance Disposal Service and the Naval Mine Warfare Group.

The tether also gives a physical recovery line if the vehicle snags or loses power near a mine, and keeps a named human operator in the loop at the point of contact, a requirement that autonomous mine-disposal systems have not yet displaced across NATO fleets.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Belgium is expanding tethered, human-operated underwater capability across four separate military branches rather than converting to autonomous mine-disposal systems.

  • Precedent

    A NATO member choosing tethered ROVs for live-ordnance work, even as it buys autonomous systems elsewhere, sets a template for keeping humans in the loop specifically at the point of contact with explosives.

First Reported In

Update #10 · Belgium's twelve robots are not autonomous

Tenders Electronic Daily· 3 Aug 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
DNV and Fassmer
DNV and Fassmer
Signed a memorandum at SMM in Hamburg, announced on 10 September, to seek an approval in principle for autonomous naval vessels. DNV's Rasmus Stute said autonomy is "becoming one of the key pillars in defence".
Belgian Ministry of Defence
Belgian Ministry of Defence
Awarded Exail Robotics Belgium €9.87m on 14 September, without competition, for three TRIDENT systems carrying the K-STER C mine-disposal vehicle for Ukraine. It had tendered separately in July for twelve tethered ROVs, not yet bought.
IRGC Navy (Iran)
IRGC Navy (Iran)
IRGC spokesman Hossein Mohebbi said the IRGC Navy seized a US Kingfish mine-hunting vehicle in the Strait of Hormuz on 27 September, valuing it at several million dollars. US Central Command calls the claim "clearly desperate"; no verified imagery exists.
UK Defence Intelligence and Kraken
UK Defence Intelligence and Kraken
Defence Intelligence said the 12 September clash "almost certainly marks the first time" Russian and Ukrainian USVs engaged directly. Kraken meanwhile trialled an unarmed Saab radar picket boat on 5 and 6 October.
Ukrainian forces and ARX Robotics
Ukrainian forces and ARX Robotics
A Ukrainian Sargan-3000 destroyed a Russian robot boat on 12 September, and the first ARX GEREON ground robots reached Ukraine on 29 September. The Sargan-3000 carries a mounted gun.
Indian Register of Shipping
Indian Register of Shipping
Certified Accurate Industrial Controls' ISACA collision-avoidance software to IMO standards after five audited milestones and 2,500 hours of trials. The firm plans to use it converting six Indian Navy patrol boats.

Written with AI from Lowdown's published reporting. Not individually reviewed by an editor. Editorial standards.