
Atlantic Council
Washington think tank on transatlantic security, NATO, and energy policy, with 25+ active research programmes.
On 4 March, Pete Hegseth rejected NATO Article 5 obligations, testing the Atlantic Council's founding case for collective defence.
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026 · Appears in 3 active topics
Can a transatlanticist think tank survive its own government abandoning NATO and published coalition rules of engagement?
Timeline for Atlantic Council
Star Blizzard lures think tanks by invite
Cybersecurity: Threats and DefencesMentioned in: OFAC hits Iranian crypto exchanges in Dubai
Iran Conflict 2026Mentioned in: Ukraine says it hit 159 tankers
Russia-Ukraine War 2026Mentioned in: Russians named in IRGC arms network
Iran Conflict 2026Mentioned in: Trump floats then drops Hormuz toll
Iran Conflict 2026Background
The Atlantic Council is a Washington-based non-partisan think tank focused on transatlantic relations, NATO strategy, energy security and global security. Founded in 1961, it convenes policymakers, former officials and analysts through more than 25 active research programmes.
Its work covers European defence, sanctions, nuclear non-proliferation and energy markets. During the Iran conflict, the Council warned that European gas storage was below 30% as the refill season began and Ras Laffan was offline.
The organisation matters because its research connects security commitments with the economic systems that sustain them. Its analyst Bilal Saab highlighted the Hormuz Coalition's unpublished rules of engagement on 20 May. That places the Council in debates about whether US and European partners can maintain credible collective action.
Its alliance case faces a test
On 4 March, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth rejected NATO Article 5 obligations during the Iran conflict. For the Atlantic Council, whose work centres on transatlantic security and collective defence, that position put a core institutional premise into a live policy dispute.
On 20 May, the Hormuz Coalition had deployed for eight days without publishing rules of engagement. The gap gave the Council's security analysts a concrete example of the Alliance-coordination problem its research addresses: military participation without agreed public rules can weaken deterrence and leave partners uncertain about commitments.