21APR

Baqaei in Farsi: message exchanges continue

3 min read

10:51UTC

Lowdown Bureau / Diplomatic. The foreign ministry's domestic-language readout held the channel open even as its English-facing statements called the US action unlawful.

← Back to Ceasefire ends in the water, a day early Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictDeveloping

Key takeaway

The civilian channel signalled in Farsi that talks are live on the same day the English posture hardened.

Foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told Fararu, the Tehran-based reformist-leaning news site, in Farsi that 'message exchanges with America continue' and that Iran 'will host a delegation from Pakistan'. Entekhab.ir, a moderate-conservative domestic outlet, carried his characterisation of the US Hormuz blockade as unlawful, the preferred legal framing heading into any next round. Neither statement appeared on IRNA, Mehr or Press TV in English or Farsi .

Baqaei has split his English-facing and Farsi-facing readouts on purpose, and the split is doing the operational work. The English-language statements issued the same day through the foreign ministry press office ran the public hardening: no plans to reengage, demand for Touska release, condemnation of the US action. The Farsi readout, aimed at the domestic reformist-centrist readership that supported Pezeshkian, confirmed the back-channel was still live. Fararu and Entekhab are the preferred conduits for signals Tehran wants Iranian elites to register without raising English-language wire traffic.

The pattern maps to the institutional split the war has run along since February. Pezeshkian's civilian government negotiates through Araghchi and Baqaei; the IRGC runs the kinetic track through Khatam al-Anbiya and Tasnim; the Majlis under Ghalibaf writes the laws that ratify what the IRGC does on the water. Baqaei's Farsi readout is the civilian channel signalling to Tehran's own elite that talks are still live; Ghalibaf's English-friendly 'table of surrender' line is the principlist channel signalling to its own base that nothing has been conceded. Both statements are official; both were released the same day; both are true within their own audience frame. Neither has produced a single signed Iranian document binding the government to either position.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei gave two very different messages on 20-21 April. In English, for international media, he called the US blockade a 'criminal act'. In Persian, for a domestic Iranian news outlet called Fararu, he said 'message exchanges with America continue' and confirmed Iran would host a Pakistani delegation. This split-register approach; one hard message for international audiences, one softer message for domestic Iranian readers; is a known feature of Iranian diplomatic communications. The Farsi version tends to carry the actual diplomatic intentions, because domestic Iranian audiences are less likely to be cited by international media. For observers watching whether a second round of Islamabad talks will happen, the Fararu interview is the more significant signal.

What could happen next?

Meaning
Baqaei's Fararu confirmation that 'message exchanges continue' is the clearest indication that the Pakistan-mediated channel survived the Touska seizure and the 20 April rhetoric; the channel is live even if Islamabad 2 attendance remains unconfirmed.
Risk
If Khamenei's 14 April 'nuclear weapons non-negotiable' frame is the binding constraint, Baqaei's Farsi softness may not represent actual MFA authority to engage; creating a false signal that delays Western market and diplomatic reassessment.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: During the November 2013 Geneva interim JCPOA talks, Iranian state media carried hardline rejection language in Persian for domestic audiences while Zarif's team accepted the interim framework in English-language briefings. The Farsi-English divergence was not accidental; it was managed by the Supreme National Security Council to maintain domestic political cover throughout the negotiating process.

Counter-parallel: In 2006, during the EU-3 negotiations, Iran's domestic press ran softer signals than the official English-language Foreign Ministry statements; but those signals preceded a complete suspension of enrichment negotiations, not a resumption. Domestic softness in Farsi does not guarantee diplomatic engagement follows.

Consensus view: Iranian Studies scholar Mehran Kamrava (Georgetown Qatar) identifies the Baqaei Farsi-Fararu divergence as a deliberate two-register strategy: English-language channels carry the maximalist framing for international consumption and domestic hardliner management, while Farsi-domestic channels carry the operational signal; 'message exchanges continue', 'Pakistan delegation expected'; for the diplomatic community that reads Fararu.

This is a practised Iranian diplomatic technique with precedents in the 2013-2015 JCPOA period.

Counter-view: Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty's Persian Service analyst Golnaz Esfandiari notes the Fararu article emerged hours after Baqaei's English-language 'criminal act' statement; suggesting the Farsi signal was a corrective issued when the English-language statement threatened to close the diplomatic door the MFA needed open for the Pakistani delegation.

Key tension: Whether the Farsi domestic signal represents a genuine diplomatic track that Araghchi will honour in Islamabad, or a holding statement to keep Pakistan engaged while Supreme Leader Khamenei's 14 April 'nuclear weapons non-negotiable' frame constrains any real movement.

First Reported In

Update #75 · Ceasefire ends in the water, a day early

Fararu· 21 Apr 2026

Read original →

Different Perspectives

China's foreign ministry

Spokesman Lin Jian rejected Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's 25 August warning that Iranian oil buyers face an "economic D-Day", saying sanctions do not help and that Beijing would safeguard its own rights and interests. China's Iranian crude imports had already halved for unrelated reasons.

Iraq's government and Erbil authorities

Erbil authorities said 10 explosive-laden drones were shot down over the city on 1-2 September with no casualties. Iraq's government condemned the attacks without naming Iran as their source, and neither Washington nor Baghdad confirmed the IRGC's claim to have hit US bases there.

Bahrain Defence Force

The General Command said air defences intercepted several Iranian missiles and drones on 1-2 September and called the use of such weapons against civilians and private property a flagrant violation of international humanitarian law.

Kuwait's Fire Force and foreign ministry

KUNA reported a hostile Iranian drone struck a residential complex in Kuwait City on 2 September; Fire Force spokesman Brigadier General Mohammad Al-Gharib said losses were confined to property. Kuwait's foreign ministry called the attack a clear breach of its sovereignty.

Jordan's Armed Forces

Petra carried a statement that air defences intercepted eight missiles violating Jordanian airspace early on 31 August and 10 of 13 fired on 1 September. The statement named no target and did not address the IRGC's claim to have struck Camp Titin and killed US personnel.

CENTCOM

CENTCOM's 1 September target list named IRGC air defence, radar, maritime and mine-laying sites in Iran but no tanker, after Axios reported anonymous officials describing a Trump-approved "tanker for tanker" drone policy. A CENTCOM spokesman declined to confirm the policy and referred questions to policymakers.