Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
21JUN

Oil prices a Hormuz reopening that has not happened

4 min read
17:51UTC

Brent crude fell to about $77.22 on 18 June, a pre-war level, while not one tanker resumed transit, insurers kept the strait excluded and the mines stayed live. The market is reading the signature; the water disagrees.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent is pricing a reopening that no insurer, mine crew or transit log has yet confirmed on the water.

Brent Crude, the benchmark that sets the price of roughly two-thirds of internationally traded oil, fell to about $77.22 on 18 June, down 6.9 per cent from $82.98 and back to a level last seen before the war 1. Traders treated the signed Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) as a completed reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Not one tanker resumed transit.

The physical strait tells a different story from the screen. No Protection and Indemnity (P&I) club, the mutual insurers that cover roughly 90 per cent of ocean-going tonnage, has lifted its Hormuz war-risk exclusion; premiums sit at four to twenty times pre-war levels, and transits run near 6 per cent of baseline . Mine-clearance crews are still working uncleared waters: an IRGC vessel issued a radio warning to a US warship during that work on signing day. None of that has reached the insurance market that decides whether a hull moves.

Brent had touched $87.33 only days earlier and slipped below $90 when the ceasefire first looked probable ; the slide now prices an operational resumption rather than a rising probability of one. If the OFAC waiver never lands, or the 60-day toll-free window lapses into a fee, the gap between paper and water closes upward. Brent at $77 runs several weeks ahead of any operational change in the strait itself.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Financial markets and physical ships operate on different clocks. Traders in London can reprice oil within seconds of reading a news headline. A tanker captain deciding whether to sail through the Strait of Hormuz needs to know the mines have been cleared, that his insurance still covers him, and that an armed vessel will not stop him halfway through. On 18 June, Brent fell 6.9% to $77.22 as traders priced the deal as a completed reopening. Yet BIMCO, the world's largest shipowner association, confirmed no P&I club had lifted its war-risk exclusion. CENTCOM's two carrier groups continued redirecting vessels. Iranian-laid mines remained uncleared. Zero commercial tankers completed a Hormuz transit that day. The price moved; the strait did not.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If no commercial tanker completes a Hormuz transit by 25 June, Brent is likely to rebound toward $82 to $84 as traders recognise the physical-to-paper gap.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Saudi Arabia's four idle supergiant fields , representing 2 to 2.5 million barrels per day of capacity , will not restart until owners confirm Hormuz is operationally clear, because VLCC loading at Safaniya and Ras Tanura exits via the strait.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Opportunity

    The first commercial VLCC completing a Hormuz transit under P&I cover would be the most significant operational market signal since the conflict began, likely accelerating the Brent decline by a further $3 to $5.

    Short term · Reported
First Reported In

Update #131 · Iran deal's first death tests the text

CNBC· 18 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.