Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
21JUN

Brent hits two-month low on deal bets

3 min read
17:51UTC

Brent crude traded near $87.33 on 12 June, a near-two-month low, as futures markets priced roughly an 80 per cent chance the Iran deal closes.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Traders priced an 80 per cent chance of an unsigned deal, leaving Brent exposed to a sharp rebound.

Brent Crude, the global oil benchmark, traded near $87.33 on 12 June, a near-two-month low and down about 6 per cent on the week, even as The White House register the market is betting on showed no signature. 1 Futures traders are pricing roughly an 80 per cent chance the Iran deal closes, a senior US official's figure, which means they are discounting the unsigned register almost entirely. 2

The fall was a step-down, not a slide: $96.34 on 10 June , $94.71 on 11 June , $89.25 on 12 June , now below $88. In three sessions the benchmark gave back the entire high it set on Hormuz risk. Traders, not diplomats, are the most confident actors that a deal they cannot see will close, discounting the blockade, the drone combat and the IRGC's review hedge on a bet that Hormuz reopens soon.

The confidence cuts one way. A near-two-month low feeds through to softer fuel and freight costs for importers within weeks if the move holds. But with 80 per cent already in the price, the market holds little cushion: a Vahidi re-suspension or a slipped signing would reprice Hormuz risk sharply and snap Brent back above $90, because the good news has been spent before the paper exists.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Oil is priced on expectations as much as on actual supply. When traders think a conflict that has been disrupting Middle East oil supply is close to ending, the price falls before a single extra barrel flows. On 12 June, with news of a possible deal circulating, the price of Brent crude, the main global oil benchmark, fell to around $87.33, its lowest in nearly two months. Markets were pricing in about an 80 per cent chance the deal would close and the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. But that calculation rests on an unsigned document and unresolved disagreements: where Iran's enriched uranium goes and whether Iran's most powerful military force, the IRGC, has agreed to the deal at all. If those problems cause a delay, the price will jump back up sharply.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    Brent near $87.33 on an unsigned deal means a single negative signal, a Vahidi re-suspension or a public IRGC contradiction, would produce a $5-$8 upward snap in one trading session.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Opportunity

    If Hormuz fully reopens and Iran's 67 million stranded barrels clear, Brent could settle in the $80-$83 band within six to eight weeks, reducing fuel and freight inflation across oil-importing economies.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    Lloyd's of London has not de-listed Hormuz from its war-risk register despite the price drop; insurance premiums remain elevated and shipping diversions at 139 vessels continue regardless of futures pricing.

    Short term · Reported
First Reported In

Update #126 · The weekend signing that never reached paper

oilprice.com· 13 Jun 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Brent hits two-month low on deal bets
Traders have priced a deal the White House register has not confirmed. With 80 per cent already in the price, the downside is asymmetric: a slipped signing snaps Brent back above $90.
Different Perspectives
Hengaw
Hengaw
The Norway-based monitoring group reported the Urmia executions of Omid Behzad and Pouria Safvat, the only source to do so, consistent with its documented pattern of recording far more executions than the Iranian state acknowledges. Iran's government has not confirmed either execution.
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
War-risk premiums price the Houthi campaign because the group announces its targets in advance, but a reopening Trump has promised without a published text gives underwriters no benchmark to reprice Hormuz cover against. Insurers want a text before they move rates, not a promise.
Houthi movement
Houthi movement
Spokesman Yahya Saree claimed strikes on two tankers in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden on 5 August, only one of which UKMTO could confirm. The group's campaign against shipping continues on its own schedule, independent of any Hormuz arrangement further north.
Oman
Oman
Muscat has brokered the coordinates both Tehran and Washington's wire sources now describe differently, but has published no account of its own. Oman's position depends on treating Hormuz as a shared route, which is not what Iran is currently describing.
United States Central Command
United States Central Command
CENTCOM raised its interdiction tally from 35 to 44 redirected vessels and disclosed its first boardings on 3 August, the day before Trump promised a reopening. The command's own enforcement record does not yet reflect the release the President has described.
Iran's Foreign Ministry
Iran's Foreign Ministry
Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei described the agreed Hormuz coordinates as a wholly new corridor under Iranian management, not a split of the existing route, days after his own deputy rejected Oman's lane proposal. Tehran wants the arrangement read as a change of ownership, not a compromise on access.