Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
11JUN

Largest Lebanon ground op since 2006

3 min read
09:17UTC

A senior Israeli official told Axios the military plans to replicate the Gaza model across all of southern Lebanon. The same objective failed in both the 2006 war and an 18-year occupation.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Israel is attempting militarily what twenty years of UN resolutions could not achieve diplomatically.

Israel has informed the United States it intends to seize all territory south of the Litani River — the largest planned ground operation in Lebanon since 2006 1. A senior Israeli official told Axios: "We are going to do what we did in Gaza" 2. The evacuation zone Israel has imposed already covers 1,470 square kilometres — 14% of Lebanon's total territory, extending beyond the boundary set by UNSC Resolution 1701 and every previous Israeli buffer demand.

The objective is the same one Israel set and failed to achieve in the 2006 war: clear Hezbollah from the strip between the border and the Litani. That war lasted 34 days, killed over 1,100 Lebanese — predominantly civilians per UN counts — and ended with Resolution 1701 requiring only the Lebanese Armed Forces and UNIFIL to operate south of the river. Hezbollah rearmed within months. Before that, Israel occupied southern Lebanon from 1982 to 2000 — 18 years that did not eliminate Hezbollah but instead forged its founding narrative and recruitment engine.

The force now defending southern Lebanon is not the Katyusha-armed militia of the 1980s. Secretary-General Naim Qassem has committed 30,000 fighters including elite Radwan units and described the conflict as existential . Israeli ground forces have already entered Kfar Kila, Houla, Kfar Shouba, Yaroun, and Khiam — the same towns Israel occupied for 18 years . Approximately 5,000 US Marines and sailors are transiting from Japan with expected arrival around 27 March 3, three weeks before Trump's stated four-week war timetable expires .

Israel frames the operation as necessary to halt Hezbollah rocket fire that has made communities across northern Israel uninhabitable — a stated aim that neither the 2006 war nor the 18-year occupation achieved by force. The explicit comparison to Gaza defines what the civilian population of southern Lebanon can expect. 826 people have been killed including 106 children; 830,000 are displaced — matching the total displacement of the entire 33-day 2006 war in under a fortnight. The Trump administration asked Israel to spare Beirut's airport; Israel agreed to that single request and nothing more 4.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Israel wants to clear roughly 30 kilometres of southern Lebanon of Hezbollah fighters, creating a security buffer zone along its northern border. A 2006 UN resolution required exactly this — and was never enforced. Israel's plan is now to take and hold that territory by force. The last time Israel occupied southern Lebanon it stayed 18 years (1982–2000). During that occupation, Hezbollah was founded, grew, and eventually expelled Israeli forces. Israel is re-entering against a Hezbollah that possesses precision rockets, an extensive tunnel network, and 30,000 experienced fighters — a qualitatively different adversary from the one it faced in 1982.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

The 'like Gaza' framing simultaneously serves three functions: military objective (sustained suppression), coercive signal to Lebanese civilians, and domestic coalition management (maximalist rhetoric holds together Ben-Gvir and Smotrich). None of the three purposes requires the strategy to be militarily coherent or sustainable. That the phrase came from a senior official — not Netanyahu himself — suggests a tested message, not an unguarded remark.

Root Causes

Over 60,000 Israeli northern border residents have been displaced since October 2023. That 17-month internal displacement has made restoring the north a domestic political survival issue for Netanyahu, entirely independent of broader war objectives. No Israeli government could survive elections without a resolution to the north.

Escalation

The combination of Dermer's appointment (a political, not military, figure) with infrastructure strikes and an already-extended evacuation zone indicates ground operation preparation entering its final phase. Israel moving before US marines arrive around 27 March would signal independent action; waiting would suggest coordinated operation. Neither scenario involves negotiation.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    A ground operation exceeding 1701 lines could trigger Hezbollah precision-missile strikes on Haifa's port and industrial zone, escalating well beyond the current exchange pattern.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Precedent

    Seizure and retention of Lebanese territory north of the 1701 line would establish that military action can override UN Security Council resolutions — with implications for future conflict settlements globally.

    Long term · Assessed
  • Consequence

    Lebanon's already-collapsed state institutions could fragment entirely under military occupation, creating a governance vacuum with no credible reconstruction partner.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Risk

    Simultaneous Gaza and Lebanon ground operations would strain IDF reserve capacity to a degree not tested since 1973, reducing responsiveness to a third front in the West Bank or Syria.

    Short term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #36 · Israel plans full Litani seizure

Al Jazeera· 15 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
Largest Lebanon ground op since 2006
Israel is preparing its largest ground operation in Lebanon since 2006, explicitly modelled on Gaza, with evacuation orders already covering 14% of Lebanese territory. The objective — clearing Hezbollah south of the Litani — failed in both the 2006 war and the 1982–2000 occupation, and the force defending southern Lebanon today has precision-guided missiles and 30,000 committed fighters.
Different Perspectives
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Oil markets and Lloyd's of London
Brent fell to $89.25 on ceasefire probability, not new barrels, with traders voting for Trump's deed over Tehran's denial. Lloyd's has not repriced Hormuz war-risk cover because its trigger requires a UN Security Council resolution or government certification, so tanker insurance costs remain elevated regardless of the spot move.
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan and Qatar mediators
Pakistan's Mohsin Naqvi was in Tehran for his second visit in under a week, using the Pakistan-Qatar channel that delivered April's ceasefire after an identical public-denial cycle. The channel carries both civilian and military buy-in from Islamabad, the only configuration Iran's split command cannot dismiss as a partial signal.
India
India
India summoned the US Deputy Chief of Mission after three Indian sailors were killed aboard MT Settebello, the first formal grievance from a major non-belligerent directed at US enforcement. Indian seafarers supply roughly 12 per cent of the global maritime workforce; their presence on third-flag Gulf tankers is structurally inevitable regardless of bilateral diplomacy.
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)
The IRGC declared Hormuz closed on 11 June while civilian negotiators were on the same mediation channel, then issued no public comment on the MoU framework. Its silence on the framework, rather than any foreign ministry statement, is the operative approval signal; the corps' unilateral Hormuz closure shows it did not treat the diplomatic track as binding on its operations.
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Iran foreign ministry (Baghaei)
Esmail Baghaei told IRNA that reports of a finalised deal were 'merely speculation' and that Iran had 'not yet made a final decision'. The denial is structurally identical to Iranian foreign ministry statements during the April ceasefire talks, which produced a binding text within 48 hours of the same language.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump cancelled the third strike day and called the MoU 'very strong' and almost ready to sign, while CENTCOM kept tanker enforcement running in the same 24-hour window. The administration is simultaneously withdrawing the military pressure it claims drove the deal and sustaining the enforcement campaign it is trying to trade away.