4AUG

The sanctions that need no signature

3 min read

10:16UTC

The US Treasury has kept sanctioning Iran throughout the war under a pre-war memorandum, freezing nearly half a billion dollars while Trump has signed no new order of his own.

← Back to AI Act fines arrive, three states list no regulator Jump to analysis ↓

TechnologyDeveloping

Key takeaway

US sanctions on Iran keep firing on pre-war authority; only sanctions relief needs a new signature.

The US Treasury has run a named, continuous sanctions campaign against Iran throughout the war, even as the White House has signed no new Iran measure. Treasury calls the campaign Economic Fury, and it operates under National Security Presidential Memorandum 2 (NSPM-2), a pre-war order that delegates designation power to the department rather than requiring a fresh presidential signature ¹.

On 27 May the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), Treasury's sanctions arm, designated Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority for extorting Hormuz shipping tolls; on 10 June it blacklisted nine China and Hong Kong entities for arming the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) ². Treasury says the campaign has frozen "nearly half a billion" dollars and disrupted "tens of billions" in regime-linked revenue ³. A direct query of the Federal Register returned zero new Iran filings between 29 June and 2 July ⁴.

The gap between an empty signing record and live enforcement has a mechanism. NSPM-2 delegates designation authority to OFAC through executive orders that predate the conflict, so Treasury can keep naming targets while any genuinely new instrument stalls. The one Iran action that did need a fresh signature, General Licence X, loosened sanctions rather than tightening them, and its missing escrow and reporting caps handed Chinese buyers a 60-day safe harbour . Relief requires a pen; pressure does not.

Donald Trump's public words and Washington's actions point in opposite directions. On 30 June he demanded cheap petrol on Truth Social and signed nothing ; on 1 July he called the denuclearisation of Iran "moving along well" ⁵. His earlier order for a Justice Department oil-gouging probe sits in the same column: enforcement motion that does not require settling the war.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The US Treasury has been sanctioning parts of Iran's economy continuously since before the war even started, under a standing campaign called Economic Fury. It does not need the president to sign anything new each time: officials can add names to the sanctions list on autopilot. In the past six weeks alone, Treasury sanctioned the Iranian body that tries to collect tolls from ships in the Strait of Hormuz, and nine companies in China and Hong Kong accused of helping arm the IRGC, Iran's most powerful military force. Even though no new sanctions appeared in the official US government record for four straight days, that gap does not mean enforcement stopped.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

Economic Fury runs on National Security Presidential Memorandum 2, a delegation of designation authority to Treasury that predates the war and requires no fresh presidential signature to continue. That is structurally different from General License X, the one Iran sanctions instrument that did need Scott Bessent's active signature to authorise oil sales and dollar payments .

The zero-filing gap between 29 June and 2 July does not mean enforcement paused: OFAC's designation pipeline runs independently of both the Doha talks and the Federal Register's publication cycle, so a quiet week in the public record does not mean a quiet week inside Treasury.

What could happen next?

Consequence
Continued designations during the funeral pause keep economic pressure on Iran even while every diplomatic channel is closed.
Risk
If Tehran reads ongoing designations as evidence Washington is not serious about a deal, it hands hardliners in the Assembly of Experts and IRGC ammunition against the negotiators.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources from United States

United States

LeftRight

Primary parallel: Sanctions relief under the 2015 JCPOA needed the opposite mechanism to Economic Fury: the US president had to actively sign a waiver roughly every four months to keep sanctions suspended, until Donald Trump declined to renew that waiver in May 2018, triggering an automatic snapback.

Counter-parallel: The Cuban embargo, imposed under the Trading with the Enemy Act in 1962, has run on delegated authority regardless of who has occupied The White House since, surviving even the Obama-era normalisation attempt, evidence that once sanctions run on standing authority they rarely reverse without a deliberate presidential act.

Immediate impact: Economic Fury has frozen close to $500 million in Iranian assets and disrupted tens of billions of dollars in revenue, according to Treasury, concentrated in cryptocurrency exchanges, shadow-banking networks and now the Persian Gulf Strait Authority itself, the body Iran created to collect Hormuz tolls.

Structural effect: designating the toll authority under counterterrorism rather than trade-sanctions statute means any government or shipping line paying an Iranian Hormuz fee risks its own dollar transactions, a legal deterrent that outlasts any single round of Doha talks.

Consensus view: The Foundation for Defense of Democracies assesses that delegated authority under National Security Presidential Memorandum 2 lets Treasury keep degrading Iran's Hormuz-toll and IRGC-procurement networks without needing a new signature, preserving leverage regardless of how the Doha talks proceed, as shown by the 27 May Persian Gulf Strait Authority and 10 June China and Hong Kong designations.

Counter-view: Bourse & Bazaar Media, which tracks Iran's economy closely, argues designations continuing on pre-war executive authority while zero new Iran filings appeared in the Federal Register between 29 June and 2 July shows Washington's enforcement machinery has become disconnected from its own diplomacy, an autopilot that can undercut negotiators' credibility if Tehran reads it as bad faith mid-talks.

Key tension: Whether delegated sanctions authority preserves US leverage, or undermines trust in the parallel diplomatic track by running independently of it.

First Reported In

Update #143 · Diplomacy pauses for a funeral under threat

US Department of the Treasury· 2 Jul 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

FDD: oil licence has no enforcement

General License X is the one Iran sanctions exception needing a fresh signature, unlike Economic Fury.

Occurred 23 Jun 2026

Read story →

Trump orders a DOJ oil-gouging probe

Trump's DOJ oil-gouging probe sits alongside Economic Fury as motion not requiring settling the war.

Occurred 24 Jun 2026

Read story →

This Event

The sanctions that need no signature

The pressure that actually costs Iran money runs on delegated authority, so it continues no matter what Doha produces.

Led to

Japan reopens Iran oil talks after 2019

Treasury's use of pre-war delegated sanctions authority is the same waiver framework Japanese buyers are now testing.

Occurred 3 Jul 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

Germany (Bundeskartellamt)

Germany's Bundeskartellamt declined to open antitrust proceedings against SAP, the company disclosed on 30 July, in the same fortnight the Commission's EUR 890m DMA fine against Google approached its 21 September compliance deadline. A German software champion cleared domestic scrutiny while an American platform faces enforcement, in the same regulatory season.

United States (USTR)

Washington's Section 301 investigation into EU digital enforcement, opened 24 July, had produced no Federal Register docket as of 4 August, even as Dell and 1,008 Nvidia GB200 NVL4 accelerators sit inside the EU's own sovereignty-branded MeluXina-AI build. The absent docket and the American hardware inside a European sovereignty project pull the same relationship in opposite directions.

UK government

The UK's Sovereign AI vehicle took a nine-figure equity stake in chip startup OLIX on 30 July, its fifth deal since April, while the Cabinet Office's 27 July fact sheet named no accounting officer for the GBP 1.1bn AI Hardware Plan. Whitehall is buying equity rather than capacity, inside a department mid-rename to Business, Innovation, Science and Trade.

Luxembourg government

Luxembourg is covering half of the newly disclosed EUR 80m contract value for MeluXina-AI, EuroHPC's Grand Duchy build, with Dell Technologies confirmed as supplying 1,008 Nvidia GB200 NVL4 accelerators, a hardware detail absent from the earlier project description. The disclosure means Luxembourg's national co-funding buys a facility built on American silicon under a European ownership badge.

European Commission

The Commission activated its Article 101 fining power on 2 August while the Article 70 register it must keep current still showed a 26 September 2025 footer and blank rows for Denmark, Finland and Hungary. It issued no comment, though Article 70 puts the publication duty on Brussels, not member states.

China's Ministry of Commerce

Spokesperson He Yadong said on 16 July that Beijing and the Netherlands should let firms settle the Nexperia dispute through consultation, after a Dutch ministerial visit to Beijing. The conciliatory tone contrasts with the confrontational US trade response to the same fortnight's DMA enforcement.