Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif declared on 12 June that "a final, agreed upon text" of the US-Iran deal had been reached.1 Within the same hours US Vice President JD Vance told CBS the deal was "still TBD", a senior US official put it at "75 per cent complete", and Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) had "never been closer" and would be signed digitally "within the next few days".2 Four principals, one text, four incompatible accounts on a single day.
The White House Presidential Actions register, the public log of every executive instrument, carried no Iran document dated 12 or 13 June.3 The only 12 June entry, a National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-12), governs cybersecurity. What President Donald Trump did this weekend, stand down a third strike day and tout the unsigned MoU as Iran dismissed it as speculation, contradicts what he said.
The spread sorts the actors by leverage. Pakistan carried the dual civilian-military message to Tehran on 6-7 June, and Islamabad's incentive to claim a diplomatic win outruns its standing to deliver either capital's signature. A mediator and a foreign ministry called the text done. The US vice president, speaking for the man who would actually sign, called it three-quarters there.
Trump's claim that Iran approved the deal at its very top rests on a Supreme Leader unreachable at deal speed, so it stays unverified. Across this war, every "close to over" statement has come from a verbal channel and never coincided with a signed instrument in the same week. The only hard 13 June facts are an empty register and a blockade that never paused.
