Skip to content
Welcome, thoughtbot's Giant Robots listeners!Start here
2026 FIFA World Cup
17JUN

Brent settles $105.30 with no fresh seizure

3 min read
10:21UTC

Brent crude settled at $105.30 on 25 April with intraday prints above $106 and a weekly gain of roughly 18%. The talks collapse alone is now the bullish driver, not fresh kinetics.

SportDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent at $105 has been repriced as the baseline; future incidents push from there, not from $67.

Brent crude settled at $105.30 on 25 April with intraday prints above $106 and a weekly gain of roughly 18% per The National⁠1. This is the second consecutive session above $105, 57% above the $67.41 pre-war baseline and a continuation from the $105.73 close on 24 April. No new IRGC seizure occurred on 25 April, and the dark-shipping picture from the Larak-Qeshm carve-out was unchanged.

The price moved on the absence of a diplomatic resolution rather than on a fresh provocation. That is a structural shift: the market has stopped treating each diplomatic failure as a temporary setback and is pricing the absence of a resolution track as the default scenario. The repricing matters because future seizures will now push the price from $105 rather than from $67, amplifying the economic shock of any tactical escalation. UK and European pump prices follow Brent with a one-to-two-week lag.

The options curve confirms the shift. With the baseline reset, any de-escalation announcement becomes disproportionately bearish rather than merely corrective, which makes the political incentive structure for Tehran and Washington asymmetric: Iran loses revenue floor on a deal, and US consumer pump prices ease only after a deal is concrete enough to clear forwards. Brent at $105 is the new floor, not a ceiling.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The price of oil affects almost everything: petrol at the pump, heating bills, the cost of goods moved by truck or ship. The benchmark price for much of the world's oil is called 'Brent Crude', named after a North Sea oil field. Before the Iran war began, Brent was around $67 a barrel. On 25 April it closed at $105.30. That is a rise of nearly 57%, and it happened in under two months. Oil markets usually react strongly to specific events (a ship seized, a factory bombed). What is significant about Saturday's price is that nothing new happened: no IRGC boarding, no strike, no military escalation. The price stayed above $105 purely because traders stopped believing the war would end soon. When the diplomacy collapses and traders update their expectations, prices move even without a physical event.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Each Islamabad channel failure narrows the oil market's probability distribution around a near-term diplomatic resolution. When Islamabad 3 collapsed via Trump's Truth Social post, traders priced the event harder than a formal diplomatic postponement would have warranted, because a social-media cancellation carries no institutional machinery for reversal.

The ceasefire is nominally in force, but CENTCOM's interdiction count reached 33 on 25 April while the naval blockade continues. Traders have concluded that a nominal ceasefire does not translate to resumed Hormuz commercial transit. Until a deal explicitly addresses the blockade, the $38/bbl structural premium over the pre-war baseline persists regardless of individual daily incident counts.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    European and Asian central banks running quarterly inflation assessments in May will incorporate $105+ Brent into their forecasts, likely deferring planned interest rate cuts by one to two quarters.

  • Risk

    Goldman Sachs's $120 Q3 severe scenario becomes the base case rather than the tail risk if both the Islamabad diplomatic track and the AUMF congressional track fail before 1 May.

First Reported In

Update #79 · Islamabad 3 collapses; Witkoff grounded, talks stall

Al Jazeera· 25 Apr 2026
Read original →
Different Perspectives
French Football Federation
French Football Federation
The FFF called an 11:00 CEST press conference for 28 July, at its Paris headquarters, following an extraordinary executive committee meeting, at which Zinedine Zidane is expected to be presented as head coach succeeding Didier Deschamps. As of this writing no communique confirms the appointment, contract length or start date.
Morocco
Morocco
Morocco is pushing for the 2030 final at its Grand Stade Hassan II in Casablanca, a planned 115,000-seat venue that would be the world's largest football stadium on completion. The venue is contested by a Spanish petition for the Santiago Bernabeu, and FIFA has fixed neither the venue nor the tournament's proposed 64-team format.
FIFA
FIFA
FIFA's first tournament report, published 27 July, itemises nearly 300,000 accredited personnel, 73,700 security staff and 300,000 square metres of custom-grown turf, with no revenue or cost figure attached. As a Swiss association answering to its own Congress rather than a treasury, FIFA has followed the same operational-before-financial sequence it used after Qatar 2022.
Javier Tebas / La Liga
Javier Tebas / La Liga
La Liga president Javier Tebas said on 21 July that FIFA's system is rotten from the root and that Gianni Infantino's time as president has, in his words, concluded. Tebas has no vote in FIFA's process, so days after the IOC declined jurisdiction over a separate ethics complaint, he used the only instrument he has.
Mexico City government
Mexico City government
Head of government Clara Brugada presented a closing report on 22 July crediting the tournament with 44 billion pesos of economic activity, 2,000-plus accelerated public works and 100,000 formal jobs in June alone. The city has not published the method behind that figure, and three other Mexican bodies count the same five weeks differently.
Town of Foxborough
Town of Foxborough
Foxborough answered Kraft Group's June lawsuit on 7 July with a 61-page counterclaim, calling the stadium's owners 'a collection of multibillion-dollar corporations' trying to shift its $7.8 million security bill onto taxpayers. The town says its licensing power and its billing power run through the same board, and it wants the court to award its own costs too.