Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Joint Plan of Action
LegislationIR

Joint Plan of Action

2013 interim Iran nuclear agreement between Iran and the P5+1; the template Araghchi referenced when proposing to decouple Hormuz from nuclear talks.

Last refreshed: 14 May 2026 · Appears in 1 active topic

Key Question

Can a JPOA-style interim agreement separate Hormuz from nuclear talks in 2026?

Timeline for Joint Plan of Action

View full timeline →
Common Questions
What was the Joint Plan of Action Iran nuclear deal?
The Joint Plan of Action was an interim nuclear agreement signed in Geneva on 24 November 2013 between Iran and the P5+1. Iran agreed to freeze or roll back nuclear programme elements in exchange for limited sanctions relief. It expired in July 2015, superseded by the JCPOA.
How did Iran use the JPOA framework in 2026 diplomatic talks?
Araghchi referenced the JPOA template to justify decoupling the Hormuz reopening from a comprehensive nuclear settlement — offering to reopen the strait before nuclear talks concluded. The US rejected the approach as not addressing the core weapons issue.Source: Lowdown
What is the difference between the JPOA and the JCPOA?
The JPOA (2013) was an interim agreement providing a pause in Iran's nuclear activity in exchange for limited sanctions relief. The JCPOA (2015) was the comprehensive deal that replaced it, providing deeper nuclear constraints in exchange for broad sanctions removal. The Trump administration withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018.

Background

The Joint Plan of Action (JPOA) was an interim nuclear agreement signed in Geneva on 24 November 2013 between Iran and the P5+1 (US, UK, France, Germany, Russia, China). It committed Iran to freeze nuclear programme elements in exchange for limited sanctions relief and served as the foundation for the JCPOA in 2015.

The JPOA has re-entered diplomatic discourse during the 2026 conflict as a precedent for phased confidence-building. Araghchi cited its logic in April 2026 when proposing to decouple Hormuz from nuclear settlement; the US rejected the framing, insisting nuclear weapons remain the core issue. The Israel Hayom report of 3 May on a proposed 15-year enrichment freeze in three stages (3.67% civilian ceiling, zero stockpiling, no infrastructure dismantlement) invites comparison to JPOA sunset clauses: where the 2013 deal ran six months and was renewable, a 15-year freeze would extend to a generation-length constraint FAR beyond any prior agreement's scope. The report remained uncorroborated by Reuters, AP, or AFP as of mid-May.

More questions
What was the Joint Plan of Action and how did it differ from the JCPOA?
The Joint Plan of Action was a six-month interim agreement signed in November 2013 in which Iran froze specific nuclear activities in exchange for limited sanctions relief. It was a confidence-building step designed to create space for negotiating the JCPOA, which was the comprehensive deal finalised in July 2015 with longer-duration and more extensive commitments.
When was the Joint Plan of Action signed and by whom?
The JPOA was signed on 24 November 2013 in Geneva by Iran and the P5+1: the United States, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, and China. It was extended twice before being superseded by the JCPOA in July 2015.
Why is the Joint Plan of Action relevant to the 2026 Iran nuclear talks?
Araghchi invoked JPOA logic in April 2026 to justify decoupling Hormuz from nuclear negotiations, arguing phased confidence-building measures were sufficient to begin de-escalation. The US rejected the framing. The JPOA also serves as the baseline comparison for the unconfirmed 15-year enrichment freeze proposal reported by Israel Hayom in May 2026.Source: Iran Conflict 2026 reporting
How does a 15-year nuclear freeze compare to the original JPOA?
The JPOA ran for six months and was renewable; its constraints were limited and reversible. A 15-year enrichment freeze, as reportedly proposed in May 2026, would represent roughly 30 times the JPOA's original duration and would extend well past JCPOA sunset clauses. The comparison illustrates how much further a post-war deal would need to go relative to the 2013 interim model.Source: Israel Hayom, 3 May 2026
Source Material