6MAY

More in Common puts SNP short of majority

3 min read

17:39UTC

More in Common's Holyrood MRP, published Friday 24 April, projects the SNP on 56 seats with Reform UK on 22, diverging by 11 seats from the YouGov and Electoral Calculus models that both put the SNP at 67 and over the line.

← Back to 1 Days to Go: D'Hondt squeezes Welsh Greens Jump to analysis ↓

PoliticsDeveloping

Key takeaway

Three Holyrood models put the SNP between 56 and 67 seats; the mandate sits inside that 11-seat range.

More in Common published its 2026 Holyrood MRP on Friday 24 April ¹. The model projects the SNP on 56 seats, Reform UK on 22, Scottish Labour on 17, the Lib Dems on 14, the Conservatives on 12, and the Scottish Greens on 8. An SNP-Green coalition on the More in Common numbers reaches 64, one short of the 65-seat majority threshold.

The projection diverges sharply from the two existing Holyrood models. YouGov has the SNP on 67 seats with a majority in 89% of simulations . Electoral Calculus also projects 67 . The 11-seat gap between the highest and lowest projection covers the genuine uncertainty in the Scottish vote. PollCheck's five-poll moving average for Holyrood at 23 April puts the SNP on 33.4%, consistent with both projections depending on geographic distribution.

Whether John Swinney has a mandate for a 2028 independence referendum depends on which model the actual vote tracks closest to. He says majority equals mandate. In the More in Common model, that mandate does not exist. Reform UK lands second in all three Scottish models, displacing Labour or the Conservatives from official opposition. The Scottish Conservatives, projected at zero constituency seats by Electoral Calculus , would lose official opposition status either way.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Scotland's Parliament (Holyrood) has 129 seats. To have an outright majority, a party needs 65. John Swinney (the SNP leader) said in his manifesto that he would call a new independence referendum in 2028, but only if the SNP wins a majority. Three different forecasting models have projected different SNP totals for the 7 May election: Electoral Calculus said 67, YouGov said 67, and More in Common said 56. The first two give the SNP a majority and trigger the referendum condition. The third does not. The difference comes down to how the models estimate what happens in rural and semi-rural Scottish constituencies where Conservative voters are switching to Reform. If they go to Reform, the SNP might benefit (because the anti-SNP vote is split). If they stay with what's left of the Conservatives or back a different alternative, the SNP's local dominance weakens. A 56-seat outcome would mean Swinney needs support from other parties to govern, removing the independence referendum trigger regardless of his manifesto commitment.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

The SNP's constituency-seat dominance , projected to hold all 73 constituencies by YouGov , depends on a collapse in Conservative support to Reform before a Conservative-to-SNP tactical vote can firm up. If enough former Conservative voters move to Reform rather than staying to back SNP incumbents over Reform challengers, the SNP loses seats not to Labour or the Greens but to a Reform protest vote that inadvertently hands constituencies to other parties.

More in Common's lower 56-seat projection reflects a modelling assumption that Reform's regional list surge in Scotland translates into a partial constituency presence in rural seats, consistent with the pattern More in Common detected in England at the 2024 general election. Electoral Calculus and YouGov treat the constituency-level Reform threat in Scotland as minimal, based on 2024 Westminster data showing Reform did not contest most Scottish constituencies.

Source Landscape

This story draws on neutral-leaning sources

Primary parallel: In the 2016 Holyrood election, the SNP fell from 69 seats in 2011 to 63, losing its majority, because a surge in Conservative support under Ruth Davidson took five constituency seats from SNP incumbents.

The 2016 election is the structural template for More in Common's model: Conservative collapse to Reform in 2026 could reprise the same dynamic in the same constituencies, with Reform performing the role Davidson's Tories played. Both Electoral Calculus and More in Common are effectively modelling different versions of whether Reform can replicate Davidson's 2016 constituency breakthrough.

Counter-parallel: The 2021 Holyrood election, in which the SNP reached 64 seats (one short of majority), was successfully called by multiple MRP models within one or two seats. The 11-seat gap between models in 2026 is significantly larger than any pre-election MRP divergence in 2021, suggesting the 2026 result has higher genuine forecast uncertainty.

Consensus view: The Electoral Calculus team at Martin Baxter has noted that the YouGov and More in Common models diverge primarily on their treatment of constituency-level swing in rural and semi-rural SNP seats, particularly in Aberdeenshire and the Scottish Borders, where Reform UK's regional list vote is projected to pull Conservative voters away from constituency SNP challengers.

YouGov's model treats this as a net gain for the SNP; More in Common's assigns a higher portion of those votes to a direct Reform challenge.

Counter-view: Reform Scotland argues that More in Common's 56-seat projection, if realised, is a better outcome for the independence movement than a bare majority: a Swinney minority government dependent on Green confidence-and-supply would face fewer of the parliamentary arithmetic problems that plagued the Bute House Agreement, and could pursue independence as a medium-term political project without the liability of being held responsible for every government failure as a majority administration.

Key tension: Whether the 56 versus 67 divergence is a methodological difference in how rural Tory-to-Reform switching is modelled, or reflects a genuine late-campaign softening of SNP support that has not yet appeared in individual polls.

Sources:More in Common

Mentions:More in Common →Scottish National Party (SNP) →John Swinney →Scottish Greens →Electoral Calculus →Bute House Agreement →Holyrood →Parliament →Prima →Scottish Conservatives →PollCheck →Scottish Labour →Reform UK →YouGov →Green Party →

First Reported In

Update #5 · 11 Days to Go: Six-of-six, RPA dies, Welsh lead flips

More in Common· 26 Apr 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

Caused by

Second MRP confirms SNP majority path

The YouGov Holyrood MRP projecting SNP majority in 89% of simulations (2313) is directly challenged by the More in Common model projecting SNP at 56 seats.

Occurred 11 Apr 2026

Read story →

Electoral Calculus projects first SNP majority since 2011

The Electoral Calculus SNP 67-seat projection (2101) is contrasted with More in Common's 56, establishing the 11-seat uncertainty range.

Occurred 7 Apr 2026

Read story →

This Event

More in Common puts SNP short of majority

The 11-seat gap between models covers whether John Swinney can claim a 65-seat mandate for a 2028 independence referendum; in the lowest projection, that mandate does not exist.

Led to

SNP at 62, three short of 65

More in Common's Holyrood MRP at 56 was the lower bound of the three-model spread that resolved to YouGov final 62

Occurred 5 May 2026

Read story →

SNP wins 58, below 65-seat trigger

More in Common projection of SNP on 56 seats formed the lower bound bracketing the 58-seat actual result

Occurred 7 May 2026

Read story →

Reform enters Holyrood on 17 MSPs

More in Common's projection of Reform second on 22 Holyrood seats foreshadowed the 17-seat actual tying with Scottish Labour

Occurred 7 May 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

Local Government Association

New chair Eamonn O'Brien broke the LGA's neutrality on reorganisation for the first time since December 2024, telling the incoming prime minister the 'unprecedented scale' of disaggregation risks statutory services and asking him to adjust the LGR timetable, aligning the sector's institutional voice with the judicial review claims Suffolk, Essex and Norfolk have already filed.

Reform UK

Reform's £12m Harborne windfall from 2025 predates the 25 March retrospective crypto-donation ban, so the new law does not reach it; a live police probe into £500,000 of Cottrell donations continues, while the standards inquiry into Harborne's undeclared £5m gift is frozen since Farage vacated Clacton on 8 July.

Incoming Burnham government

Burnham secured 349 of the backing the NEC's 81-MP threshold required by 13 July, becoming Labour leader on 17 July and prime minister on 20 July without a members' ballot. He now inherits the LGR timetable the LGA wants him to adjust and a finance bill his own backbencher, Liam Byrne, is trying to harden further via amendment NC34.

Rupert Lowe / Restore Britain

Lowe called Farage's Clacton contest a 'Reform-sponsored media circus' and kept Restore Britain out of it, pledging instead to stand in the second by-election he expects the Harborne inquiry to force later this year. The boycott doubles as a signal that Restore Britain, not Reform, will contest the 'real' vote.

Kemi Badenoch / Conservative Party

Badenoch dismissed Farage's Clacton contest as a 'fake by-election' and joined the boycott, but reserved the right to fight a genuine second contest if Greenberg's inquiry forces one. The Conservatives are betting their real fight comes in autumn, not July.

Rhun ap Iorwerth / Plaid Cymru

Ap Iorwerth defended a £145m NHS allocation at First Minister's Questions on 1 July, blaming a graduate-nurse shortfall on 2022 training decisions taken before his Plaid-led government took office in May. Answering for choices his government did not make gives his new administration its first real accountability test.