12OCT

Gargash warns: neither war nor peace

2 min read

10:59UTC

Anwar Gargash, the UAE president's diplomatic adviser, wrote on X on 11 August that the region cannot remain trapped between war and peace. Abu Dhabi had helped call off an American strike nine days earlier.

← Back to US licenses Russian diesel and turns on Kyiv Jump to analysis ↓

ConflictDeveloping

Key takeaway

Abu Dhabi's senior diplomat says the region cannot stay stuck between war and peace.

Anwar Gargash, diplomatic adviser to the president of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), wrote on X on Tuesday 11 August, warning that the region cannot remain trapped between "neither war nor peace"⁠¹. Gargash is Abu Dhabi's most senior public voice on foreign policy, and the UAE is not a bystander in this war. On 2 August Donald Trump called off a planned strike at the request of Riyadh, Doha and Abu Dhabi. Six days after that, the Emirates said an Iranian missile had targeted a vessel belonging to the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) in the Strait of Hormuz.

Gargash is describing that position from the inside. Abu Dhabi spent political capital to stop the bombing, and its own shipping is being fired on regardless. A Gulf state can lobby Washington out of a strike in an afternoon; it cannot lobby a war-risk underwriter, and it has no lever at all over what leaves an Iranian launcher. Hence the complaint, from a government that has run out of things to ask for.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Anwar Gargash, a senior adviser to the president of the United Arab Emirates, posted on X that the region cannot stay stuck between 'neither war nor peace', meaning fighting has slowed without any real peace deal in place. The UAE is one of the Gulf countries that has been trying to stop the war between the US and Iran from getting worse, including helping persuade President Trump to cancel a planned strike on Iran earlier this month.

Deep Analysis

Root Causes

No enforceable ceasefire mechanism exists between Iran and the US-Gulf coalition. Every halt in fighting so far has come from an individual intervention: Caine's 26 July warning to Trump over munitions stockpiles, then the Gulf states' 2 August request that called off a planned strike .

Neither halt rests on a negotiated framework, which is why Gargash describes the current state as 'neither war nor peace' rather than a ceasefire: no document exists that would make it one.

What could happen next?

Risk
Gargash's warning signals Gulf frustration that the current lull rests on individual interventions rather than a negotiated ceasefire, raising the chance a single incident, such as the disputed 8 August ADNOC vessel strike (ID:5650), could tip the region back toward open fighting.

Source Landscape

This story draws on centre-left-leaning sources from United Kingdom

United Kingdom

Primary parallel: Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's personal intervention with Trump on 2 August (ID:5537), arguing Iranian retaliation on Gulf states would reach the global economy, achieved the same goal Gargash's statement now seeks, keeping the region short of full-scale war, through direct Gulf leverage over Washington rather than any bilateral Iran-Gulf channel.

Counter-parallel: Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkiye signed a mutual-defence pact in Mecca on 7 August treating an attack on one as an attack on all three, though no signatory has published the text. That points the opposite way, toward formal military alignment rather than diplomatic appeal, suggesting Gulf states are hedging with collective defence commitments even while publicly calling for peace.

Consensus view: Middle East Eye reported on 11 August that US-Iranian talks remain stalled and both sides warn fighting could resume, the same framing Gargash's statement echoes. The UAE was one of three governments, alongside Qatar and Saudi Arabia, that persuaded Trump to call off a planned 2 August strike on Iran, giving Gargash's own government a direct stake in keeping that pause from collapsing.

Counter-view: The UAE was itself targeted on 8 August, when an Iranian missile reportedly hit an ADNOC-owned vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, an incident whose identity remains unresolved. That undercuts any reading of Gargash's appeal as coming from a bystander asking for calm from safety; the state he describes already includes attacks on Emirati-linked assets.

Key tension: Whether the Gulf pressure that halted the 2 August strike can hold given continuing Iranian pressure on Emirati interests, or whether 'neither war nor peace' is a fragile pause on the way back to open conflict rather than a stable middle state.

Sources:Middle East Eye

Mentions:Anwar Gargash →Riyadh →Qatar →Doha →Middle East Eye →Washington →Strait of Hormuz →Iran →Abu Dhabi →ADNOC →Emirates →Mecca →Pakistan →Saudi Arabia →Mohammed bin Salman →Donald Trump →United Arab Emirates (UAE) →

First Reported In

Update #169 · The war moved from the air to the water

Middle East Eye· 12 Aug 2026

Read original →

Causes and effects

This Event

Gargash warns: neither war nor peace

A Gulf capital that helped halt an American strike is now saying the halt has settled nothing.

Led to

Abu Dhabi cuts Iran's payment channel

Gargash's warning that the region cannot survive between war and peace preceded the UAE's unilateral halt.

Occurred 17 Aug 2026

Read story →

Different Perspectives

Government of Latvia

Latvia abstained on 22 September when the EU renewed its individual sanctions for 36 months at the price of delisting Alisher Usmanov and Mikhail Fridman, and promised national sanctions of its own. Riga's abstention marks how far a frontline member state will go to keep listed names listed.

India's Ministry of External Affairs

After the House passed the Graham bill on 16 September, India's foreign ministry said it would keep buying energy on market terms and protect its trade. Russia supplied 30.3% of India's crude imports in fiscal 2026, so the tariff decision due around 18 October falls directly on New Delhi.

Kaja Kallas, EU foreign policy chief

Kallas answered the US licence on 10 October by saying Europe would not ease pressure, and EU ministers adopted a 22nd package of nearly 1,600 listings two days later. Brussels is tightening as Washington loosens, though TASS reported the package adds no significant new trade restrictions.

Donald Trump and the US Treasury

The Treasury licensed Russian diesel imports until 7 April 2027 on the day of Trump's call with Putin, and Trump then told reporters Ukraine should find a new leader. Washington is trading sanctions relief for fuel supply while pressing Kyiv to halt the refinery strikes behind the shortage.

Kremlin and Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak

After the 9 October call the Kremlin said Russia was ready to supply oil and petroleum products to American and global markets, and Novak brought forward the end of diesel export curbs. Moscow is selling the shortage back as goodwill, with volumes that Decree No. 686 now hides from outside checks.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President of Ukraine

Zelenskyy called GL 135 an investment in prolonging the war and offered to stop striking Russian refineries if Russia stops destroying Ukraine's energy system. Answering Trump's call for a new leader, he set a total 60-day ceasefire as the condition for elections, which puts the next move on Moscow.