Skip to content
Iran Conflict 2026
20MAR

IDF opens western front in Hamedan

3 min read
05:44UTC

More than 200 targets struck in Hamedan province, including the air base from which Iran launched its first direct attack on Israel in April 2024.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Striking Hamedan shifts the campaign from IRGC infrastructure to Iran's conventional military architecture.

Over the past 24 hours the IDF concentrated strikes on Hamedan province in western Iran — the first sustained Israeli targeting of the country's western flank. More than 200 targets were hit, described by the IDF as command centres, air defence systems, and weapons storage and production sites 1. Among them: Shahid Nojeh Air Base, a primary Iranian Air Force facility roughly 300 kilometres west of Isfahan.

Nojeh is not a random base. It was one of the launch sites for Iran's April 2024 attack on Israel — Operation True Promise — when Tehran fired over 300 missiles and drones at Israeli territory in its first direct strike from Iranian soil. Hitting Nojeh two years later is the IDF closing an account opened in that exchange. The base housed F-4 Phantom and Su-24 aircraft squadrons; whatever remained of Hamedan's air capability after two weeks of broader degradation is now under direct fire.

The geographic expansion follows a deliberate pattern. Israeli strikes concentrated first on Tehran and surrounding military infrastructure, then moved to Isfahan's nuclear and aerospace facilities. Five days ago the IDF issued an evacuation warning for TabrizIran's fourth-largest city in the northwest, home to a distinct Turkic minority with a separate political relationship to Tehran's central government . Hamedan confirms a parallel westward push. Iran must now defend three axes simultaneously — central, northwest, and west — with an air defence network the IDF has spent two weeks systematically degrading. Each expansion stretches Iran's remaining early-warning and interception capacity thinner across a country roughly seven times the size of the United Kingdom.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

For the first six weeks of strikes, Israel focused on central and eastern Iran. Hamedan is in the west — closer to Iraq, further from Israel — and home to one of Iran's most important conventional air force bases. This is not Revolutionary Guard territory; it is Iran's regular military. By striking there, Israel is widening its target set from Iran's proxy-management apparatus to the national armed forces themselves. Shahid Nojeh was the base from which Iran launched its April 2024 attack on Israel. Israel is now destroying the airfield it was attacked from — and foreclosing its use by anyone else.

Deep Analysis
Synthesis

Nojeh's dual history — used by Russia to project power into Syria in 2016, now struck by an American ally — illustrates how Iranian basing infrastructure has become a contested node in multiple great-power conflicts simultaneously. Iran leveraged the facility to enable Russian operations; Israel is now erasing that projection capacity. The base's destruction forecloses future use by any power seeking to operate from Iranian soil, a structural change extending well beyond this campaign.

Root Causes

The geographic shift to western Iran most likely reflects target-set exhaustion in previously struck regions. After 400 waves, high-value fixed targets in central and eastern Iran may have been destroyed or relocated. Western Iran represents a second ring of strategic depth — its inclusion signals the campaign has entered a deeper-penetration phase, not merely an intensification of prior operations.

Escalation

Moving strikes westward towards Iraq's border risks activating Iran-backed Iraqi militias — Kata'ib Hezbollah and Harakat al-Nujaba — that have remained relatively restrained. A perceived threat to western Iran's military infrastructure may trigger cross-border rocket attacks on US forces at Ain al-Asad or Erbil, a horizontal escalation vector the body does not address.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Expanding strikes to IRIAF infrastructure signals Israel is targeting Iran's military reconstitution capacity, not only current threat vectors.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    Strikes near Iraq's border may activate Iran-backed Iraqi militias, expanding the conflict's geographic footprint to US forces in theatre.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Consequence

    Destruction of Nojeh forecloses Iranian or third-party use of the facility for future power projection — a lasting structural change independent of war outcome.

    Long term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #37 · Six more weeks of strikes; Hormuz deal dead

Times of Israel· 16 Mar 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
IDF opens western front in Hamedan
The first sustained IDF strikes on western Iran open a third geographic axis in the campaign, forcing Tehran to defend a wider perimeter at a time when its central air defences are already degraded.
Different Perspectives
South Korean financial markets
South Korean financial markets
South Korea, which imports virtually all its crude oil, is absorbing the war's economic transmission most acutely among non-belligerents. The second KOSPI circuit breaker in four sessions — with Samsung down over 10% and SK Hynix down 12.3% — reflects an industrial economy unable to reprice energy costs that have risen 72% in ten days. The market response indicates Korean industry cannot sustain oil above $100 per barrel without margin compression across manufacturing, semiconductors, and shipping.
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
Migrant worker communities in the Gulf
The first confirmed civilian deaths in Saudi Arabia — one Indian and one Bangladeshi killed, twelve Bangladeshis wounded — fell on communities with no voice in the military decisions that placed them in harm's way. Migrant workers live near military installations because that housing is affordable, not by choice. Bangladesh and India face the dilemma of needing to protect nationals who cannot easily leave a war zone while depending on Gulf remittances that fund a substantial share of their domestic economies.
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Azerbaijan — President Ilham Aliyev
Aliyev treats the Nakhchivan strikes as a direct act of war against Azerbaijani sovereignty, placing armed forces on full combat readiness and demanding an Iranian explanation. The response is calibrated to maximise international sympathy while stopping short of military retaliation — Baku cannot fight Iran alone and needs either Turkish or NATO backing to credibly deter further strikes.
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
Oil-importing nations (Japan, South Korea, India)
The Hormuz closure is an existential threat. Japan, South Korea, and India receive the majority of their crude through the strait — they will bear the heaviest economic cost of a war they had no part in.
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Global South governments (Indonesia, Brazil, South Africa)
Neutrality was possible when the targets were military. 148 dead schoolgirls made it impossible — no government can explain that away to its own citizens.
Turkey
Turkey
Has absorbed three Iranian ballistic missile interceptions since 4 March without invoking NATO Article 5 consultation. Each incident narrows Ankara's political room to continue absorbing without Alliance-level response.