Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
17AUG

ISW: Russia lost ground; new axis opens

3 min read
15:37UTC

ISW assessed Russia net-lost about 91 square miles in the four weeks to 9 June as its offensive stalled, while Meduza flagged the Dobropillia sector as Moscow's new pressure point in western Donetsk.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

Russia is losing ground on net yet probing Dobropillia to flank Ukraine's main fortress city.

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a Washington think tank that publishes daily battlefield assessments, found Russia net-lost about 91 square miles in the four weeks to 9 June 1. A net loss means Ukrainian gains and Russian withdrawals outweighed Russian advances over the period. The figure continues a stall ISW first flagged when it logged a roughly 100-square-mile net loss in the four weeks to 26 May .

The trend has held into June. ISW recorded no Russian advances at all on 7 June , and the front has not produced the kind of breakthrough Moscow's spring offensive promised. Ukraine tripled Russia's per-kilometre attrition cost to 179 losses per square kilometre this year , so Moscow now spends more men for less ground.

The forward-looking signal sits in where Russia probes next. Meduza, a Russian exile outlet, identified the Dobropillia sector in western Donetsk as Moscow's new pressure point, an axis that would bypass Kramatorsk from the west. Kramatorsk anchors Ukraine's fortified "fortress belt", the dense line of defended towns Russia has battered without breaking since 2024. A flanking push through Dobropillia would aim to turn that belt rather than assault it head-on, which is why a single sector flag matters more than the net-loss number suggests. Russia cannot move the line by force, so it is hunting for a way around it.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a Washington-based research group that tracks the Ukraine battlefield daily, found that Russia actually lost more territory than it gained over the four weeks up to 9 June, a net loss of around 91 square miles. Separately, a Russian exile news outlet called Meduza reported that Russian forces appear to be starting a new push in the Dobropillia area of western Donetsk. This is significant because Dobropillia sits to the west of Russia's main advance routes and could, if successful, allow Russian forces to approach the key Ukrainian fortress-city of Kramatorsk from an unexpected direction. No Russian breakthrough has occurred there yet, and ISW classifies the activity as a probe rather than a main effort.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    If the Dobropillia probe develops into a sustained operational push, Ukraine must reinforce a third Donetsk axis simultaneously with Pokrovsk and Kurakhove, which strains an already-tight manpower and artillery allocation.

  • Meaning

    ISW and DeepState's divergence on the four-week territorial balance, one showing a net Russian loss and the other a small Russian gain, reflects different methodologies for counting contested settlements and should be read as a signal that the front is in near-stasis rather than either side holding a clear edge.

First Reported In

Update #20 · Oil vise shuts as Russia torches the Lavra

PBS News / AP· 16 Jun 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Kpler counted five Hormuz transits on 16 August against 31 the previous weekend, while Windward logged four vessels going AIS-dark for up to a month; underwriters price both the attacks and a sanctions register that names their counterparties in unreadable scanned images. Two trackers now measure only the ships that consent to be seen.
China
China
China sits at the end of the payment chain the 14 August designation targets: Iran's shadow banking network exists to convert sanctioned oil sales, much of it to Chinese refiners, into usable funds. Beijing has previously refused to recognise OFAC's jurisdiction over its own entities buying Iranian crude, leaving this designation to test compliance rather than change trade.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's foreign ministry denied on 16 August holding any Iranian pilots alive, contradicting Iranian General Mohammad Bagherzadeh's claim that Doha holds three Su-24 aircrew, and said it had recovered only one set of remains. Qatar carries Iran's messages to Washington, and this is a public break with Tehran over a fact only one aircrew inquiry can settle.
Oman
Oman
Oman's shipping-map talks, covering monitoring, environment and maritime services, were publicly decoupled from any Hormuz reopening by Iran's own foreign minister on 17 August. Muscat's mediation channel keeps functioning on the narrow file it was given, while the political decision it hoped to unlock stays with Iran's security council.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia separately called the recurrence of tanker attacks on Emirati shipping a dangerous escalation, breaking from the UAE's repeated formula. Riyadh speaking in its own name over an attack on another state's vessels signals it reads the pattern differently from Abu Dhabi's flat statements.
United Arab Emirates
United Arab Emirates
The UAE foreign ministry condemned a third ADNOC-linked tanker attack on 15 August in language identical, word for word, to its statement the day before. Three consecutive strikes on Emirati shipping have not moved Abu Dhabi's public wording by a single adjective.