Skip to content
Briefings are running a touch slower this week while we rebuild the foundations.See roadmap
Iran Conflict 2026
4MAR

ISW Logs Third Straight Net-Loss Week for Russia

3 min read
04:21UTC

ISW assessed Russia net-lost 12 sq mi between 5 and 12 May and a further 29 sq mi between 12 and 19 May, extending the April territorial-loss pattern as Moscow extended its gasoline export ban through 31 July.

ConflictAssessed
Key takeaway

Three straight net-loss weeks and a fuel-export ban extension are pulling on the same constrained refining base.

The Institute for the Study of War (ISW, a Washington think-tank publishing daily battlefield assessments) assessed Russia net-lost 12 sq mi of territory between 5 and 12 May 2026, then a further 29 sq mi between 12 and 19 May 1. Those are the second and third consecutive net-loss weeks since the pattern first appeared in April , and the 12-19 May figure is the largest single-week net loss recorded since the spring offensive began.

Russia imposed a gasoline export ban through 31 July 2026 in response to refinery damage, extending the April measure first taken when the Kirishi refinery ceased operations . Moscow is now defending a home fuel market and a slipping front at the same time, with the same set of constrained refining outputs feeding both. The extension to the end of July signals the Ministry of Energy does not expect the central-Russia refinery picture to clear inside ten weeks.

Net-loss numbers at this scale do not by themselves indicate Russian collapse. Twelve and 29 square miles in a week are small absolute movements on a thousand-kilometre front; the war has run for years at slower rates. Three consecutive net-loss weeks indicate something narrower: the direction of the trade has flipped. After more than a year of incremental Russian gains in the Donetsk axis, the ledger has gone the other way, briefly.

The pairing with the export ban tightens that signal. Forces that cannot generate sortie volume because their fuel chain is constrained also cannot generate the close-air-support tempo Russian formations have relied on to convert assault losses into ground. The refinery campaign and the front-line ledger are converging on the same week in May.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Researchers at the Institute for the Study of War have been tracking which side is gaining more ground each week. For three weeks in a row from late April to mid-May 2026, Russia lost more ground than it gained. That had not happened since Ukraine's Kursk incursion in August 2024. The numbers are not huge: Russia lost the equivalent of a couple of square miles per week. But the direction matters. Russia had been slowly gaining ground for over a year. The reversal is happening at the same time Ukraine is destroying fuel refineries, which limits how many aircraft sorties Russia can fly and how much fuel reaches frontline vehicles. Russia has also banned petrol exports until the end of July, which is a sign the fuel shortage is serious enough to require emergency domestic rationing.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    If net-loss weeks continue through June, Russian operational commanders face pressure to redeploy units from the Zaporizhzhia-Kherson axes to shore up the Donetsk front, thinning defensive depth in the south.

  • Risk

    Moscow's fuel export ban reduces hard-currency revenue in Q2 at the same moment the Q1 deficit overshoot requires emergency financing, compressing the fiscal runway Bruegel estimates at four to six months.

First Reported In

Update #17 · Istanbul talks, refineries dark, deficit overruns

Eastern Herald· 22 May 2026
Read original
Causes and effects
This Event
ISW Logs Third Straight Net-Loss Week for Russia
Two more weeks of net-negative Russian advance, paired with a fuel-export ban extension, suggest the front line and the home fuel market are tightening on the same timeline.
Different Perspectives
Oil markets / Lloyd's underwriters
Oil markets / Lloyd's underwriters
Futures markets priced CENTCOM's strikes-complete statement as a de-escalation signal and pushed Brent down 1.7 per cent to $94.71, even as the IRGC declared Hormuz closed. Lloyd's war-risk premiums held elevated because institutional de-listing requires a UN Security Council resolution that Russia and China have just shown they will block.
Pakistan (mediator)
Pakistan (mediator)
Interior minister Mohsin Naqvi carried dual civilian and military letters to Mojtaba Khamenei in Tehran on 6-7 June with no public response. The IRGC's Hormuz closure on 11 June shows the corps is acting independently of the channel Pakistan is using, making the mediation structurally unable to produce a binding commitment without direct IRGC access.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Russia and China voted against GOV/2026/40 at the IAEA Board, following through on the blocking position coordinated with Grossi in Geneva on 5 June; both states continue to oppose Western institutional pressure on Iran at every multilateral venue.
E3 and IAEA (UK, France, Germany)
E3 and IAEA (UK, France, Germany)
The E3 co-sponsored IAEA resolution GOV/2026/40, adopted 21-3-10 on 10 June, demanding Iran disclose 440.9 kg of unaccounted HEU and admit inspectors to four denied facilities. The 10 abstentions and Russia-China noes leave any Security Council referral without a viable enforcement path.
IRGC / Iran military command
IRGC / Iran military command
The corps declared Hormuz closed to all traffic on 11 June and claimed two vessels struck, overriding the MoU its own civilian negotiators were pursuing through Pakistan. The closure order used the Persian Gulf Strait Authority apparatus to convert a toll mechanism into a military prohibition.
Trump administration / CENTCOM
Trump administration / CENTCOM
CENTCOM completed a second day of strikes on Tehran, Sirik and Minab, rejected the IRGC Hormuz closure as inconsistent with observed transit, and said strikes were complete. Hegseth framed the bombing explicitly as the negotiation: the method is coercive deal-making with no stated pause threshold.