Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
12AUG

Iran and Oman rule transit fees out

2 min read
14:52UTC

Esmaeil Baqaei said on 10 August that transit fees are not under discussion with Oman, and named the four areas that are: monitoring, environment, maritime services and crime.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Iran says no charge for passage is on the table; Oman has said nothing at all.

Iran's foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei ruled transit fees out of the shipping route talks with Oman on Monday 10 August, and named four areas that are under discussion: monitoring, environmental protection, maritime services and crime 1. A joint statement still waits on technical points.

Baqaei first described this bilateral channel in May, when he said the two governments were in continuous consultations following an expert-level meeting in Muscat . Three months on, those four headings are the first content the mechanism has produced in public. Iran and Oman administer the strait between them under a 1968 agreement that predates the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, which is why a co-signed arrangement carries legal weight that a scheme Tehran writes alone does not.

Ruling out a charge for passage answers the loudest Western objection to anything Iran proposes for the waterway. A toll looks like payment for transit that shipping law does not permit; monitoring, pilotage and pollution rules look like two coastal states doing their jobs. That distinction is the whole argument, and Baqaei has just conceded the point without conceding the strait.

Iranian and Western officials described this same mechanism in incompatible terms on 5 August . Neither Muscat nor Washington has confirmed Baqaei's version, and until one of them publishes something, four headings and a pending joint statement are what exists.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran and Oman sit on opposite shores of the Strait of Hormuz. A route plan needs both states because ships pass through waters near each coast. The four subjects are ordinary shipping tasks, such as tracking vessels and providing maritime services. Saying that fees are off the table does not mean the countries have agreed who makes the rules.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Oman controls the southern side of the 33-kilometre strait and has preserved relations with both Tehran and Washington. That geography gives Muscat a role no outside naval coalition can fully replace.

Iran's earlier proposal paired a bilateral protocol with toll collection . Removing fees from the stated agenda lowers a visible commercial obstacle, but it does not settle who controls routing or enforcement.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Iran and Oman have named four administrative tasks that could support a joint route plan.

  • Risk

    The countries have not published a joint text defining enforcement authority or service charges.

First Reported In

Update #168 · Iran replaces the man who set its terms

Islamic Republic News Agency· 11 Aug 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Anwar Gargash, UAE presidential diplomatic adviser
Anwar Gargash, UAE presidential diplomatic adviser
Gargash warned the region cannot stay trapped between "neither war nor peace", naming the stalemate itself as unsustainable for a Gulf state hosting US forces and absorbing the shipping-risk cost without being party to either the strike decisions or the corridor talks.
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
War-risk premiums are still set against an active blockade and a fatal Bab el-Mandeb attack with an unresolved vessel identity. A disabling strike and a diplomatic "advanced" claim pulling in opposite directions gives underwriters no single signal to reprice cover against.
Pakistan and Qatar (Oman corridor mediators)
Pakistan and Qatar (Oman corridor mediators)
Pakistan's defence minister said matters are "shaping up in favor of peace" on Hormuz and a Qatari spokesperson called the Iran-Oman reopening talks advanced. Both are publicly ahead of Tehran's own security council, which has just disowned the deal's significance.
United States Central Command / President Trump
United States Central Command / President Trump
CENTCOM confirmed a helicopter strike disabled a container ship that tried to evade the blockade, and Trump said the US "totally controls" the Strait of Hormuz. Washington is treating evasion of the blockade as grounds for disabling fire rather than the redirection tactic CENTCOM used through July.
Mohsen Rezaei, Iran's Supreme National Security Council
Mohsen Rezaei, Iran's Supreme National Security Council
Rezaei told China's ambassador Hormuz reopens only when the US ends the war and unblocks Iran's funds, and that the Oman transit deal "will have no impact" on that decision. He is drawing a hard line between the technical corridor track and the political settlement his council controls.
Yemen's internationally recognised government and affected communities
Yemen's internationally recognised government and affected communities
SABA reported at least 17 soldiers killed at Saudi-backed camps in eastern Yemen as tanker use of Bab el-Mandeb fell. The fighting adds civilian and supply risks to a route ships use when Hormuz is unsafe.