Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
6AUG

IRGC thanks Jordanians for helping it aim

3 min read
15:43UTC

The IRGC says its 21st Nasr-2 wave destroyed 20 hangars at Azraq and Aqaba and damaged C-17 and P-8 aircraft, and it thanked Jordanians for supplying intelligence. No US, Jordanian or Kuwaiti source corroborates any of it.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Tehran's uncorroborated claim thanks Jordanian soldiers for intelligence, a line aimed at Amman's domestic politics.

The IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) Aerospace Force claimed on 20 July that the 21st wave of its Operation Nasr-2 struck the Azraq area and Aqaba Airport in Jordan, destroying 20 hangars used to station troops, killing "dozens of American terrorist forces" and heavily damaging C-17 cargo transports and P-8 surveillance aircraft 1. No US, Jordanian or Kuwaiti source corroborates any part of it.

Press TV, Iran's state broadcaster, carried the account, so the figures stand as Tehran's assertion and nothing more. The IRGC is Iran's parallel military, answerable to the Supreme Leader rather than to the regular general staff, and its Aerospace Force holds the missile and drone inventory that has been used against Gulf and Jordanian targets throughout this war.

The line worth reading twice sits at the end of the statement. The IRGC thanked "the Jordanian public and members of the country's armed forces for providing intelligence" 2. Nothing in that sentence carries military value. Coordinates for a base hit repeatedly since 9 July do not need publicising, and a real source inside a partner military would not be advertised in a broadcast. The likelier audience sits in Amman: naming no one but implicating everyone, the line invites Jordanians to wonder which of their own soldiers helped, at a moment when The Kingdom is already fielding questions about the base where American service members died . Jordan has not responded.

The banner moved as well. Iran's regular army, the Artesh, claimed the Gulf target set under its own name on 16 July and called it Operation Saeqeh , and by 18 July Iranian state media had that campaign running to phases 14 and 15 across Kuwait, Jordan and Bahrain . This wave arrives under a different label from a different institution. Two Iranian militaries claiming the same enemies in the same week says more about who is competing for credit in Tehran than about what happened at Aqaba.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Iran's Revolutionary Guard says it struck a Jordanian air base and airport, claiming to have destroyed hangars and damaged US aircraft, and thanking ordinary Jordanians for supplying intelligence. None of this has been confirmed by Jordan, the US or Kuwait, so it should be read as an Iranian claim, not an established fact. The 'thanks to Jordanians' line is new and inflammatory: it implies people inside Jordan helped Iran target a US ally, something Jordan's government has not responded to.

What could happen next?
  • Risk

    An unconfirmed claim of Jordanian civilian intelligence-sharing could strain US-Jordan trust even if the underlying strike claim proves false, since the accusation itself is now public.

  • Precedent

    Two Iranian services claiming the same Jordanian target set within days suggests competition for domestic credit is now shaping which branch announces which strike.

First Reported In

Update #157 · IAEA takes up Darkhovin as utilities become targets

Press TV· 20 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.