Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
6AUG

Jordan stops three of four incoming missiles

1 min read
15:43UTC

Jordan shot down three of four incoming Iranian missiles on 19 July, and its deputy prime minister took a call condemning the attacks. One missile was not stopped.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Jordan intercepted three of four missiles and published the count, unusually for a state under fire.

Jordan shot down three of four incoming Iranian missiles on 19 July, and its deputy prime minister received a call condemning the attacks 1.

The fourth missile got through, and Amman has not said where it came down or what it struck.

Amman did not choose this exposure. Muwaffaq Salti Air Base sits inside Jordan's borders and has drawn Iranian fire since 9 July , most seriously in the 17 July attack that killed American service members . Jordan commands none of the aircraft that fly from the base and none of the operations they support, yet every missile launched at them crosses Jordanian territory.

Releasing a three-of-four number does work at home. It shows a defence that mostly functions, to a public being told from Tehran that Jordanian soldiers are feeding Iran targeting information. The condemnation call delivered to the deputy prime minister carries the diplomatic half of the same message, addressed outward while the interception count is addressed inward.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Jordan says it shot down three of four incoming Iranian missiles on 19 July. Its deputy prime minister also received a phone call condemning the strikes. This is one of several Iranian strikes on Jordan this month; the country has been targeted since it was first drawn into the war on 10 June {{EVREF:/t/iran-conflict-2026/123/iran-hits-us-bases-in-three-countries/}}. Jordan giving a specific number, three of four, rather than claiming a full intercept, is a plainer disclosure than the IRGC's own unverified claims about Jordan and Kuwait this same week.

What could happen next?
  • Meaning

    Jordan disclosing a partial three-of-four intercept rate, rather than claiming full success, is a plainer disclosure than the IRGC's uncorroborated Nasr-2 claims this same week.

First Reported In

Update #157 · IAEA takes up Darkhovin as utilities become targets

Al Jazeera English· 20 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.