Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
22JUN

Brent jumps 6% as oil ends its shrug

2 min read
09:56UTC

Brent crude rose about 6 per cent to roughly $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, its biggest jump since the war's opening spike in March.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Brent jumped about 6 per cent, its biggest since the war's March spike, pricing escalation it had spent months ignoring.

Brent Crude rose to about $78.67 a barrel on 8 July, up roughly 6 per cent, with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) at about $74.82, its sharpest single-day rise since the war's opening spike in March . 1 Brent is the benchmark that prices about two-thirds of internationally traded crude, so a move of this size feeds petrol, diesel and airline fares within weeks. It had sat near $73 after the Al Rekayyat strike alone .

Prices fell through every earlier shock of this conflict. Brent dropped to $71.99 through the June bombing of Qeshm Island , and the second quarter closed down about 30 per cent, the steepest quarterly fall since 2020 . What moved the market this time was not one more incident but a strike and a retaliation landing in the same cycle, which raises the probability traders assign to an actual closure of the strait of Hormuz.

Saudi Arabia floated an expansion of a Red Sea pipeline to route crude around Hormuz, and tankers began making U-turns in The Gulf, according to trade reporting. 2 The thirty-five tankers that cleared the strait at pre-war rates on 2 July now move under a threat level the market has finally chosen to price. A Saudi pipeline, if pursued, is a multi-year structural hedge rather than a quick fix, and tanker diversions tighten Gulf supply just as OPEC+ was adding barrels.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

Brent Crude and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) are the two main global oil price benchmarks. Brent jumped about 6 per cent in a single day, its biggest one-day rise of the whole war, after the CENTCOM strikes and Iran's Gulf retaliation raised fears that tankers moving through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway carrying roughly a fifth of the world's oil, could come under attack or be blocked. Saudi Arabia responded by floating a plan to expand a pipeline that would let its oil bypass Hormuz entirely by crossing overland to the Red Sea instead.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

Oil traders price Hormuz risk through tanker insurance and freight rates as much as through headline events: P&I Clubs had already kept their Hormuz war-risk exclusion in force after the 7 July Al Rekayyat strike, meaning underwriters were signalling elevated risk before Brent moved.

Saudi Arabia's floated Red Sea pipeline expansion revives bypass capacity the kingdom has held since the 1980s Petroline system; reviving it now signals Riyadh expects further volatility rather than a one-off shock.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Saudi Arabia's Red Sea pipeline expansion, if pursued, would give Riyadh a durable hedge against future Hormuz disruption independent of any US or Iranian action.

  • Risk

    A sustained price spike above $80 would test whether P&I Clubs' war-risk exclusion pushes tankers to demand naval escort before transiting Hormuz.

First Reported In

Update #149 · The first thing Washington signed on Iran: a revocation

The National· 8 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Hengaw
Hengaw
The Norway-based monitoring group reported the Urmia executions of Omid Behzad and Pouria Safvat, the only source to do so, consistent with its documented pattern of recording far more executions than the Iranian state acknowledges. Iran's government has not confirmed either execution.
Shipping and insurance underwriters
Shipping and insurance underwriters
War-risk premiums price the Houthi campaign because the group announces its targets in advance, but a reopening Trump has promised without a published text gives underwriters no benchmark to reprice Hormuz cover against. Insurers want a text before they move rates, not a promise.
Houthi movement
Houthi movement
Spokesman Yahya Saree claimed strikes on two tankers in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden on 5 August, only one of which UKMTO could confirm. The group's campaign against shipping continues on its own schedule, independent of any Hormuz arrangement further north.
Oman
Oman
Muscat has brokered the coordinates both Tehran and Washington's wire sources now describe differently, but has published no account of its own. Oman's position depends on treating Hormuz as a shared route, which is not what Iran is currently describing.
United States Central Command
United States Central Command
CENTCOM raised its interdiction tally from 35 to 44 redirected vessels and disclosed its first boardings on 3 August, the day before Trump promised a reopening. The command's own enforcement record does not yet reflect the release the President has described.
Iran's Foreign Ministry
Iran's Foreign Ministry
Spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei described the agreed Hormuz coordinates as a wholly new corridor under Iranian management, not a split of the existing route, days after his own deputy rejected Oman's lane proposal. Tehran wants the arrangement read as a change of ownership, not a compromise on access.