Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
21JUN

Qatar halts LNG ramp on carrier strike

2 min read
17:51UTC

QatarEnergy halted its Ras Laffan restart on 9 July after a strike on the carrier Al Rekayyat, extending force majeure to some Asian buyers into August and pulling expected volume back out of the market.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

QatarEnergy stopped adding LNG supply just as Europe's injection season needs the marginal cargo most.

QatarEnergy halted the restart of its Ras Laffan export complex on Thursday 9 July, two days after a missile Qatar says Iran fired disabled the LNG carrier Al Rekayyat near the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday 7 July 12. Chief executive Saad al-Kaabi kept the terminal at minimum output, cut the number of vessels scheduled to dock, and extended force majeure notices to some Asian buyers into August 3. Ras Laffan handles close to a fifth of the world's LNG, so a halt there reaches every hub that prices off the marginal cargo.

QatarEnergy's move reverses the guidance it gave at the start of July, when it still expected to reach 50% of capacity within a month against a ceiling set by escort-convoy capacity rather than diplomacy . Two trains destroyed in the March strikes had already capped any recovery near 83% of pre-conflict nameplate . al-Kaabi has now removed the floor beneath that cap, taking expected barrels out of the forward balance rather than adding them to it.

That withdrawn volume routes east regardless of where Europe needs it. The JKM-TTF arbitrage has held an Asia premium of roughly 1.4 to 2.4 USD/MMBtu through the run-up, wide enough to pull marginal Atlantic cargoes towards Northeast Asia rather than into European injection . Europe loses the swing cargo at the same moment Qatar stops adding to the pool, in the middle of the season when storage most needs it.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

QatarEnergy is the state company that runs Qatar's giant Ras Laffan gas export site, one of the world's largest sources of liquefied natural gas (LNG), gas cooled into liquid so it can travel by ship instead of pipeline. After a tanker loading from Ras Laffan was attacked on 7 July, the company's boss, Saad al-Kaabi, stopped plans to increase output and cut the number of ships allowed to dock. He also told some Asian buyers they will not get their normal cargoes into August, using a legal clause called force majeure that lets a supplier miss contracted deliveries when events outside its control make them impossible. That reversal matters because Qatar had said only weeks earlier that it expected to reach half its normal output within a month. It now has no public timeline at all.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

QatarEnergy's ramp-up was already structurally capped before Tuesday's strike: two Ras Laffan trains destroyed in March hold recovery near 80% of pre-conflict nameplate for years, not months, and Lloyd's List identifies escort-convoy capacity, not diplomacy, as the binding constraint on how fast LNG carriers can transit regardless of demand.

The 7 July strike removes the assumption underlying even that reduced pace: a direct attack on a carrier rather than ambient risk to the corridor, which is why al-Kaabi halted output at Ras Laffan itself rather than merely slowing the shipping schedule.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    European buyers lose the marginal LNG cargoes QatarEnergy was expected to redirect west as it ramped up, tightening the summer supply cushion just as storage refill already lags last year's pace.

    Short term · Assessed
  • Risk

    A fourth attack on Qatari LNG infrastructure this year would test whether QatarEnergy extends force majeure beyond August or begins renegotiating contracted volumes outright.

    Medium term · Suggested
  • Precedent

    Extending force majeure past a company's own guided restart date, rather than simply missing it, sets a template Qatar may reuse if further strikes occur.

    Short term · Reported
First Reported In

Update #25 · Qatari LNG strike puts TTF back over EUR 50

Bloomberg· 10 Jul 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
Shipping and insurance industry
Shipping and insurance industry
UKMTO counted about 20 US-facilitated Hormuz transits a day to 11 September against only 6 visible on AIS, with traffic still around 90% below the 138-a-day pre-war baseline. War-risk underwriters cannot price hulls they cannot see, or resolve whether the tanker El Gaia hit a mine, as Iran claims, or a missile and drone, as CENTCOM says.
European refiners
European refiners
European refiners, including Poland's Orlen, absorbed a roughly $26 gap between Dated Brent at $130.80 on 15 September and ICE Brent futures settling at $103.87 on 18 September, a spread that widened from $13.45 on 9 September rather than newly opening. Their futures hedges no longer cover what they now pay for physical barrels.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Aramco zeroed European term customers' October allocations and rerouted roughly 60 million barrels to Asia through Ras Tanura and Sohar, using Red Sea and Gulf terminal capacity built years ago to cut Hormuz exposure. Riyadh reallocated existing supply rather than negotiating a shortfall with Europe.
Qatar
Qatar
Qatar's energy minister Saad al-Kaabi told Bloomberg at the Qatar Economic Forum on 20 September that Bessent's two-year Hormuz-obsolescence forecast is wrong, and that Doha has deliberately built no bypass pipeline. Qatar's gas exports run through one waterway by choice, not oversight.
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran (foreign ministry and Majlis)
Iran's foreign ministry and 130 Majlis deputies moved toward NPT withdrawal this week, with lawmaker Hossein-Ali Haji Deligani filing a triple-urgency bill on 20 September that Speaker Qalibaf has not yet scheduled. Tehran treats treaty membership as leverage still on the table, not yet spent.
Russia and China
Russia and China
Moscow and Beijing vetoed the Panel of Experts' renewal, maintaining Resolution 2231 lapsed in October 2025 and the 2025 snapback was never validly triggered, so the sanctions architecture the Panel enforces has no current legal standing. Both governments frame the veto as upholding law, not shielding Tehran.