Skip to content
You can now search across every topic, entity and event.What's new
Iran Conflict 2026
16JUN

Trump: blockade stays till deal signed

3 min read
10:20UTC

Trump set his most specific reopening condition yet on Sunday: the naval blockade stays "until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed." No instrument accompanied the post. The blockade holds regardless of the deal talk.

ConflictDeveloping
Key takeaway

Trump's signed-deal condition keeps the blockade in force and rules out a verbal memorandum.

Donald Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday 24 May that the US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz will stay "in full force and effect until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed" 1. He added that talks were "proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner" and told his negotiators "not to rush into a deal" because "time is on our side." No executive order or presidential instrument accompanied the post.

Trump had earlier presented the negotiation as nearly settled ; the 24 May post adds an operational condition rather than fresh optimism, and its value lies in what it commits the United States to do rather than say. "Certified, and signed" sets a documentary bar the talks have not met: it rules out the partial or verbal memorandum structure the negotiations had been moving toward.

For the reader arriving cold: the blockade is the US Navy enforcing closure of the strait, the world's busiest oil chokepoint, through which roughly a fifth of seaborne crude moves. Trump's condition means the ships stay regardless of how warm the diplomatic language gets, until a signed text exists. That is why a deal can be reported as close while the strait stays shut.

The condition also bears directly on the sequencing fight. Iran wants its frozen assets freed before it concedes anything operational, while Trump now wants a signed agreement before he lifts the blockade. The two preconditions point in opposite directions, and a verbal understanding satisfies neither. On the day, the only concrete US act was the wording of a social-media post, and the blockade it described needed no signature to stay in force.

Deep Analysis

In plain English

President Trump posted on 24 May that the US naval blockade of the Persian Gulf will stay in place until a deal with Iran is reached and actually signed, agreed by both sides, and formally certified. He also told his negotiators to take their time. This rules out a looser kind of deal where both sides announce they have agreed without writing it down. Iran and the US had been trying to reach exactly that kind of informal arrangement. Trump's post says a signed document is required before the blockade ends, which raises the bar significantly for the ongoing talks.

Deep Analysis
Root Causes

The absence of signed instruments across 87 days of conflict traces to a constitutional and legal-reversibility calculation. The United States War Powers Resolution (1973) requires the president to submit a written report to Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces.

Trump submitted no such report; the administration has argued the operation falls under existing Authorizations for Use of Military Force. A 'certified and signed' MOU, if it constitutes a ceasefire terminating existing hostilities, would create a legislative record the White House has so far avoided.

Additionally, any signed MOU that includes US sanctions relief requires OFAC to publish a general licence, which becomes a permanent public record challengeable under the Administrative Procedure Act. Trump's preference for Truth Social over signed instruments reflects the legal-reversibility advantage of executive non-commitment: no signed text means no APA challenge, no Senate ratification hearing, and no precedent that constrains future executive action toward Iran.

What could happen next?
  • Consequence

    Any informal MOU structure, including the 60-day framework Ghalibaf and Vance had reportedly developed, requires revision into a formally signed instrument before the blockade can lift under Trump's posted condition.

    Immediate · Assessed
  • Risk

    Iran's Khamenei Council may interpret 'certified and signed' as a demand for a treaty-level instrument, which would require US Senate ratification that no Republican senator has indicated willingness to provide.

    Short term · Suggested
  • Precedent

    A signed MOU, once deposited, becomes the first Iran-specific signed US executive instrument of the entire 87-day conflict, filling the zero-instrument gap documented across every prior post.

    Medium term · Assessed
First Reported In

Update #107 · Two markets, two prices on one Iran deal

Al Jazeera· 25 May 2026
Read original
Different Perspectives
G7 Leaders (ex-US)
G7 Leaders (ex-US)
Kananaskis ended without a joint communique for the first time in the body's history; Macron credited G7 pressure with speeding the ceasefire while Trump publicly denied the summit played any role. The split between US and European G7 partners over what the memorandum means for sanctions relief was the direct cause of the text failure.
Protection-and-Indemnity insurers
Protection-and-Indemnity insurers
London-based P&I mutual clubs declined to underwrite Hormuz crossings while the IRGC Strait Authority remained operational, making the passage commercially impassable regardless of the memorandum's terms. Shipping operators said they would wait weeks for on-water conditions to change before routing tankers through.
IRGC Persian Gulf Strait Authority
IRGC Persian Gulf Strait Authority
P&I mutual insurers declined to underwrite Hormuz crossings on 15-16 June while the IRGC's Strait Authority remained in operation, reducing actual transits to two vessels against a pre-war daily rate of 94. The corps' revenue-generating toll mechanism, created 5 May and collecting $1.5-2 million per VLCC in crypto, has not been stood down and cannot be dissolved by Ghalibaf's signature.
Israeli Cabinet
Israeli Cabinet
Netanyahu admitted he had not seen the memorandum's text but confirmed IDF forces would stay in southern Lebanon; Finance Minister Smotrich called for ten Beirut buildings destroyed per Hezbollah drone and National Security Minister Ben-Gvir said the agreement 'does not bind us in any way'. Israel signed nothing in Islamabad and is the central unresolved variable in the Lebanon clause.
Iranian Majlis hardliners
Iranian Majlis hardliners
Around 60 MPs signed a letter demanding Ghalibaf explain the memorandum; Paydari faction MP Sabeti said the deal violates the Supreme Leader's red lines, and MP Aboutorabi argued the document carries binding obligations 'that cannot be resolved by simply changing the name'. President Pezeshkian defended the negotiators against accusations of betrayal, confirming the fracture inside Iran's political class.
US Vice President JD Vance
US Vice President JD Vance
Vance signed on 15 June and said the memorandum was 'not conditioned on Israel withdrawing from Lebanon' while also saying it 'envisioned a ceasefire that covers both Iran and Lebanon'. The two formulations are incompatible and hand Iran's foreign minister a ready-made violation claim before Geneva.